Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 220, 2025
2025 2nd International Conference on Language Research and Communication (ICLRC 2025)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04024 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
Section | AI and Technology-enhanced Language Education | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522004024 | |
Published online | 13 August 2025 |
Accent-related discrimination in English learning: A quantitative exploration of educational equity and learning outcomes
College of Foreign Languages, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China
* Corresponding author: fl.jtfu22@gzu.edu.cn
In the dual contexts of globalization and the standardization of language education, the issues of pronunciation in English learning become important topics, reflecting educational equity and social identity. Standardized pronunciation is often regarded as the core indicator of language proficiency. The evaluation system of “superiority and inferiority of pronunciation” may lead to implicit discrimination based on accent, affecting students’ participation and learning self-efficacy. However, there is still a lack of systematic empirical analysis of the educational stages, and school types. This study focuses on phenomena such as the anxiety triggered by pronunciation problems, changes in motivation, and the unfair distribution of educational resources. Through questionnaires, it reveals that teachers’ excessive focus on pronunciation standards is apt to exacerbate students’ psychological pressure. The causal chain of “teachers’ evaluation-motivation response” is verified through regression models, providing empirical evidence for correcting the traditional teaching concept of “only standard pronunciation”. Although most schools offer oral English courses, insufficient resources limit students’ practical opportunities because of gaps in educational resources among different regions.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.