Study on Significant Mechanisms of Maintenance Culture Among Public Building Users in Malaysia

Malaysia, a country in Asia, is a fast-growing developing country in its construction so as to fulfil the demands of today. Many buildings, infrastructures and facilities were constructed; however, the necessary support required after construction was disregarded. Maintenance is the key for the system, and culture is the main point of attitude and behaviour towards the maintenance culture. Becoming one of the first class infrastructures in the world is the vision that Malaysia is striving to achieve, and a third mentality from society and organisations should be avoided. However, to achieve this vision, proper maintenance is not enough; a maintenance culture should be applied. Developing a maintenance culture will help obtain the vision quickly and increase the quality of productivity in maintenance. It will also reduce the repair cost and increase responsibility. Malaysia is becoming a first class infrastructure, which is the vision for today; therefore, it needs to avoid a third mentality. Concerning this matter, decisive components of the maintenance culture were studied to identify the types of components that influence the maintenance culture among public building users. The decisive components of maintenance were uncertainty awareness and responsibility; personality/human behaviour and attitude; mind-set/motivation; training; knowledge and learning process; culture trends; management commitment; management of organisation; leadership; fundamental and policy; operating system organisation; the enforcement; laws and rules; and current practice of maintenance methods.


Introduction
The construction of any building, whether by the government or the private sector, is usually based on fulfilling specific needs; either for the use of providing services, investment purposes, occupancy or others within a stipulated period of time.Therefore, the proper maintenance system should be indeed maintained in a good and effective manner.The building should install proper maintenance.Hafizi et al. [1] stated that a building must ensure that it is in a safe and productive state, able to be correctly utilised, fulfils all legal requirements, maintains its physical asset value and upholds its build quality.
The continuance of construction activity required by the government must be provided with efficient services to the public [2].This is in-line with the statement made by the Malaysian Works Ministry that explained how the increased role and responsibilities of the Federal Agencies at the state level had caused the need for more construction of Federal Buildings at both the state and district a Corresponding author : azree@usm.myThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.levels.As a consequence, the increase of federal buildings was in tandem with the rise of maintenance cost borne by the government [3].
In the Eighth Malaysian plan, the development plan allocation for repair and maintenance works was RM296 million, which increased to RM11079 million in the Ninth Malaysian plan [4].This proved that repair and maintenance activity will be become increasingly important in the future.Even though the government allocated very high portions, negative issues are still being reported.Despite the government's commitment towards building maintenance, buildings have not been effectively maintained [5].It was shown that there was an apparent weakness in the aspect of public buildings.The ineffective implementation of maintenance activities in public buildings was directly associated with cultural aspects where the existing maintenance culture was imperative in providing a world class infrastructure in a nation [6].The issues of considering maintenance culture aspects are one of the factors that cause maintenance works to be conducted inefficiently

Methodologies
This study was conducted according to the secondary data, whether the data review involved published or unpublished data such as journals, books, theses, articles and conferences.From this secondary data, the decisive component maintenance culture was discovered.The theoretical framework for this study was developed, as well as the questionnaire form to be used for research data collection.A purposive sampling method was chosen which involved eight federal buildings located in Penang, Selangor, Terengganu and Melaka.A total of 350 sets of the questionnaires were distributed and 51.1% were received from respondents.This study employed a questionnaire instrument that consisted of four sections: Section A (demographic respondents), Section B (importance of maintenance culture), Section C (critical component maintenance culture) and Section D (component influence of maintenance culture among public building users).The sampling used a 5point Likert Scale (no neutral choice) with a light sense of force, ranging from 1 "Strongly Disagree," 2 "Disagree," 3 "Not Sure," 4 "Agree" and 5 "Strongly Agree" as to measure the respondents' choice of maintenance culture.The Likert Scale was used in Section B, Section C and Section D. The SSPS 2.0 software was applied to analyse the data.The Cronbach's Alpha reliability test was carried out to determine the reliability of the responses obtained for each of the maintenance culture components that were listed in the questionnaire.Moreover, Nunnally (1978) recommended that instruments used in basic research have a reliability of about 0.7 or higher.In this study, five top components were chosen based on Cronbach's Alpha analysis which was over 0.950, and this was due to the strong components that formed the maintenance culture.

Data Analysis and Discussions
A total of 179 questionnaires were collected.A total of 103 of the respondents were female (57.54%) and only 76 (42.46 %) were male.The largest age group of respondents were within the age of 31 to 40 years old (37.75%), followed by the age group of 26 to 30 years old (33.52%), 41 to 60 years old (22.35%) and finally the age group of 18 to 25 years old (8.4%).The majority of the respondents were Malay (91.06%) and the minority of the respondents were Other Race.Both Indian and Chinese had the same value which was 3.4%.Most of the respondents had 1 to 5 years of experience (41.9%) in the organisation, followed by respondents who had 5 to 10 years of experience (20.1%) and then those with more than 10 years of experience (26.3%).Only 11.7% of the respondents had less than 1 year of experience in the organisation.The majority of respondents had no experience in maintenance (64.8%) while only 35.2% had experience in maintenance.From the respondents (35.2%) who had experience in maintenance, the majority had 1 to 5 years (54.10%) of experience, followed by the respondents who had experiences in maintenance from 6 to 10 years (24.6%) and then by those with more than 16 years of experience (19.67%).Only (1.64%) of the respondents had 11-15 years of experience in maintenance.  1 displayed the results of the maintenance culture components in 8 federal buildings.It was agreed by the respondents that the maintenance culture components were important and it influences public building users.The components were high with the Cronbach's Alpha for importance of maintenance culture and critical component amounting to 0.879 and 0.871.The Cronbach's Alpha for components influencing maintenance culture was 16 components and the highest were responsibility and laws and rules which were 0.959.This was followed by knowledge (0.955), training (0.954) and awareness (0.952).Next was enforcement (0.945), management of organisation (0.941), management commitment (0.940) and fundamental and policy (0.938).The next value of Cronbach's Alpha was current practice method of maintenance (0.936), personality and attitude (0.931), operating system organisation (0.930), culture trend (0.918) and leadership (0.905).The lowest value was mind-set (0.881).The results of the study supported the results of past studies and found that maintenance culture was important and acceptable with 16 components.The most important maintenance culture components were responsibility [7] and laws and rules that need to be followed by users.In this paper, only five top components presented the questions, mean and Cronbach's Alpha if item was deleted.Cronbach's alpha for these five components was over 0.950 and it was the highest in this study.
Sustainable Built Environment Symposium (SBES 2014) The most important maintenance culture components were responsibility (Table 2) and laws and rules (Table 3), as previously mentioned.Responsibility was an important role and a cornerstone for both individuals and organisations regarding the duties given by organisations.In any case, the feeling of professional pride and the sense of meaningfulness of one's own work was a very positive aspect for the maintenance culture: possessing experience and responsibility were the central aspects emphasised in the artefacts (management talks, procedures, etc.) of the culture [7] and this was proven by the value of the mean (4.3855).Rules and laws were the guidelines for maintenance system that users must follow to achieve government standards; illustrating the importance of maintenance culture (4.3184).4 displayed the components of knowledge, which was third in rank.Knowledge is the process involved in establishing and implementing programs that provides benefit for those involved in enforcing them [8] and it is useful in managing maintenance activity (mean value: 4.3743).Knowledge is of increasing importance for achieving higher productivity and is on an accelerating pace of change in the business environment.

SHS Web of Conferences
Table 5 showed the components of training which was fourth in rank.Training is the development of attitudes, knowledge and specialised skills required by the employees to perform their duties properly [9].This was proven by the value of the mean (4.3520).Training also provides regular practice in actions which may form into habits that will lead to skills or knowledge; improving individuals (mean value: 4.3520).Through this, individuals and groups will have the awareness to keep assets and facilities, and may also have the desire to improve the quality of work during job performance.Lack of uncertainty awareness will negatively affect the culture and that may also influence the next generation of that culture.Table 6 presented respondents' agreement on 'awareness' being the top five that influence maintenance culture.The respondents acknowledged that awareness is the basis for a culture of maintenance, proven by the value of the mean (4.326) which was the highest.This was mentioned by Suwaibatul et.al [10] whereby our culture failed to learn their lessons that every year the audit report displayed the increasing cost for maintaining government assets [11,12,13].
In summary (Table 7), the following were the most significant components that influence maintenance culture among public building users, as ranked by the respondents.regarding duties given by organisations, which showed positive aspects on individuals and their duties.

Rules and laws
Rules and laws are the guidelines for the maintenance system that users must follow to achieve government standards.Knowledge Knowledge is the process involved in establishing and implementing such programs that provide benefit for those who implement them.

Training
Training is the development of attitudes, knowledge and specialised skills required by the employees to perform their duties properly.Training is also the regular practice of actions which become habits that show improved skills or knowledge.Awareness Lack of uncertainty awareness will effect negatively and may influence the culture and the next generations of cultures.
The outcome of this paper was to determine the decisive components which influence the existence of a maintenance culture of public building users, and to investigate the manner and form of these decisive components.The results presented the top five components that were much stronger than the other components.However, the other components were also 'acceptable' since the results illustrated that the Cronbach's Alpha analysis was more than 0.7 (Nunnally, 1978).To form the maintenance culture into any organisation, all these components are needed.
Sustainable Built Environment Symposium (SBES 2014) 01001-p.5 Overall, the results of this study designated that the maintenance culture components are very important.The conclusion can be used as a basis to develop maintenance culture in the maintenance industry in Malaysia for the relevant public building users.Maintenance culture needs to be developed and applied in public sectors as well as private ones.It is hoped that these findings would become a catalyst for a more compressive study.To provide stronger evidence and analysis for the adequacy of the result, future research is suggested to examine larger samples involving all public buildings in Malaysia (including all federal buildings, public facilities, universities, schools, army bases, police stations and so on).This study can also be applied in the private sector.Both public and private sectors can employ this study since it may give numerous benefits and ensure that users are aware of building environments.It is useful to guarantee that users have high productivity, save cost and high quality and thus can intensify the image of the organisation in the world and spread the information plan set by the government; obtaining the title of 'first world infrastructure and first world mentality'.

DOI: 10
.1051/ C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences,

Table 1 .
Cronbach's Alpha of Importance of Maintenance Culture and Components

Table 2 .
The Component of Responsibility

Table 3 .
The Components of Rules and Laws

Table 4 .
The Components of Knowledge

Table 5
The Component of Training Cronbach's Alpha : 0.954

Table 6 .
The Components of Awareness

Table 7 .
Top Five Hypotheses on the Components of Maintenance Culture Component Description Responsibility Responsibility is an important role and a cornerstone for both individuals and organisations