Analysis of the correlation between youth-developing provinces and common wealth—Taking Zhejiang Province as an example

. Youth development province refers to the province development method that mutually stimulates youth innovation and creative vitality and province innovation and creative vitality, and mutually promotes youth high-quality development and province high-quality development.2021 The Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Supporting the High-quality Development of Zhejiang Province to Construct a Common Wealth Demonstration Zone, which was introduced in 2021, further clarifies that the judgment indicators for the realization of the common wealth can be classified into 10 aspects, namely high-quality development, Income Distribution, Social Public Services, Resident Income, Quality of Life, Culture and Entertainment, Basic Education, Sustainable Ecology, Life Safety, Information and Transportation. Taking Zhejiang Province as an example, this paper starts from the question of whether there is a certain correlation between the building of youth development province and the realization of common prosperity, and analyzes the correlation between the index of youth development province and the index of common prosperity in Zhejiang Province, and discusses and expounds the construction direction of the goal of "common prosperity" in Zhejiang Province.


Introductory
The youth development-oriented province is a new urbanization strategy centered on human beings, and through the continuous improvement of the policy environment and social environment to meet the diversified and multi-level development-oriented needs of young people, so as to promote the mutual stimulation of youth innovation and creative vitality and urban innovation and creative vitality, and the mutual promotion of high-quality development of youth and high-quality development of the city [1] .
Common wealth is the essence of socialism and the goal of the struggle, the term "common wealth" was first written into the important documents of the party and important newspapers in 1953, and began to be widely used after that. [2]2021 The Opinions of the State Council of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Supporting Zhejiang's High-Quality Development and Building a Common Wealth Demonstration Zone was released at , which further clarified that the indicators for the realization of the common wealth can be divided into 10 aspects: highquality development, income distribution, public social services, residents' incomes, quality of life, culture and recreation, basic education, sustainable ecology, safety of life, and information and transportation.
Is there a correlation between the creation of youthdeveloping provinces and the realization of common prosperity?Although the existing research has not fully verified the correlation in detail, various regions have − Corresponding author:2249900183@qq.com been exploring and experimenting with attractive policies on employment, entrepreneurship, and settlement.Therefore, this paper examines and analyzes the correlation between youth-developing provinces and shared prosperity, and the coupling and coordination of their development.

Research Methods and Data
between the youth development-oriented provinces and the common wealth in Zhejiang Province.

Construction of the indicator system
Establishing an appropriate index system is the basis for evaluating the coupled and coordinated development of quality and common wealth in youth development provinces.Based on the research results of scholars at home and abroad in the quality index and common wealth index collar of youth development-oriented provinces, [3,4,5,6,7,8,9] follow the principles of science, operability and data collectability, and combine with the characteristics of the actual development of Zhejiang Province, the evaluation index system of the quality and the common wealth of the youth development-oriented provinces is constructed respectively (Table 1).
Ideology and morality.The construction of youthdevelopment-oriented provinces is an important tool for the in-depth implementation of the Medium-and Long-Term Youth Development Plan (2016-2025) during the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan period.Through the pilot program, it is conducive to further improving the implementation mechanism of the Plan, enriching the policy system of youth development, and promoting the implementation of the specific tasks of the Plan.The main task of the pilot construction of youth development-oriented provinces is to continuously improve the leadership mechanism of the Party committee for youth development work, centering on the goal of "cities becoming more youth-friendly and youth becoming more active in cities".With this clear political orientation, the city will create a better policy environment for the implementation of the Plan, create more policy carriers for the concept of prioritizing youth development, and lead the development of young party members. [10]outh Education.Research on Higher Education Indicator System,The European Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD started the research on education development indicator system in the 1970s, which is a more complete indicator system formed on the basis of human capital theory and the framework of CIPP analysis model.Among them, the indicators of higher education include: gross enrollment rate of higher education, graduation rate of higher education, per capita expenditure on higher education and its ratio to per capita GDP, ratio of expenditure on higher education to GDP, tuition fees and student living subsidies of higher education, proportion of population in higher education, situation of international students, rate of continuing education for adults, ratio of students to teachers in higher education, and rate of full-time employment for higher education qualifications, and so on.UNESCO UNESCO's assessment of education development is published in the Global Education Monitoring Report, which consists of five dimensions, namely education supply, education demand, access and participation, internal efficiency of education, and education output, with a total of 22 indicators. [11]In this paper, seven of the more straightforward secondary indicators have been selected as measures of the educational situation of young people.
Youth health.According to the National Physical Fitness Standard for Students, improving the operation mechanism of youth physical fitness monitoring has become the key to promoting the healthy development of youth, which is in line with the sports development model of the new era.With the characteristics of incentive mechanism and guarantee mechanism, youth physical health testing has revitalized the operation of youth physical health monitoring, which is the external driving force to strengthen youth physical health. [12]outh Marriage.Analyzed from a financial point of view, the number of youth marriages can reflect the development process of the city to a certain extent.The rapid increase in urbanization will affect people's concepts and behaviors of marriage and parenthood.In the past decade, the population has accelerated the transfer to big cities and central cities, and the pressure of housing, transportation and consumption will have a practical impact on people's love and marriage. [13]outh Social Participation.Currently, researchers have conducted relevant studies on social participation and its influencing factors.Social participation is defined as the behavior of individual citizens to participate in or influence the public affairs of the government and society through certain ways, and it is a dynamic development process that emphasizes the formation of coordination and mutual assistance, responsibility sharing, and responsibility-sharing mechanisms.Some researchers believe that social participation refers to the process of adaptation, molding, assimilation, and eventual integration of different individuals or groups.Social participation, also known as "social integration", is a dynamic, progressive, multidimensional and comprehensive concept. [14]In this paper, this comprehensive concept is measured in terms of the more concrete "social workers" and the number of assistants.
Youth social security.The Study on Social Security Problems and Countermeasures of Contemporary Youth divides youth groups into three categories: working youth groups, studying youth groups and special youth groups, and conducts a survey in the form of a questionnaire on the issue of "Youth Groups' Knowledge of and Satisfaction with Social Security" for the three youth groups. [15]ble 1 Indicator system for evaluating the quality of youth-developing provinces and common prosperity systems Level

Gray correlation analysis
Gray correlation analysis method refers to the degree of similarity or dissimilarity of development trends between two systems over time or different objects [16] .The main influencing factors in the system can also be explored through the gray correlation model, which is calculated as follows: ( Where ξm,n(t) is the correlation coefficient between the mth indicator of the quality of youth development province and the nth indicator of the common wealth in year t.ρ is the resolution coefficient, and the smaller ρ is, the greater the resolution.When ρ≤0.5463, the resolution is the best, and in general, ρ=0.5.γmn(t) is the correlation coefficient, the higher the value, the stronger the correlation.

Analysis of the degree of coupling coordination
Coupling degree refers to the dynamic correlation relationship between two or more systems that interact and influence each other to realize coordinated development, which can reflect the degree of interdependence and mutual constraints between the systems; the degree of coordination refers to the magnitude of the degree of benign coupling in the coupled interaction relationship, which can reflect the good or bad coordination status. [17]Through the coupling coordination degree model, we analyze the degree of interdependence and constraints between the two systems of youth development province and common wealth and the degree of coordinated development between them.The coupling coordination degree model is as follows: Where C is the degree of coupling, D is the degree of coupling coordination, U1 and U2 are the quality index of the youth development province and the index of the degree of common affluence, respectively.C ∈ (0,1), C = 0, indicating that the two systems are not coupled to the development of the two systems, the closer the value of C is to 1 indicating that the better the coupling state is, and the best the coupling state is when C = 1; D ∈ (0,1), the closer the value of D is to 0, indicating that the degree of coupling coordination between the two systems is lower, and the coupling will be towards disorderly development, the closer D is to 1, indicating that the higher the degree of coordination of the two systems coupling, the specific division of the stage is shown in Table 2; a, b are the parameters to be estimated, and because the youth development-oriented provinces are equally important as the common wealth system, so a, b are taken as 0.5.Province, etc.In order to eliminate each index plus for the measure of quantity, all data are normalized in a dimensionless way.In this paper, we believe that the seven dimensions of the youth development province quality index and the four dimensions of common prosperity are of the same importance, so the comprehensive index is constructed with equal weights.The final quality evaluation index of youth development-oriented provinces and common wealth index are as follows in Table 3:

Analysis of results
This study applies the gray correlation model and the coupled coordination model to study the relationship between the two systems of the quality of youthdeveloping provinces and the degree of realization of common prosperity, in order to clarify the impact of youth-developing provinces on the degree of realization of common prosperity and the degree of coupled coordination between the two.

Gray correlation result analysis
The results of the gray correlation analysis of the quality of youth developmental provinces and the degree of common prosperity are shown in Table 4: The correlation between the quality of youth development provinces S0 and the degree of common prosperity C0 is 0.818, indicating that there is a strong correlation between the two systems, and that the construction quality of youth development provinces has a greater impact on the degree of realization of common prosperity.The correlation between the seven level indicators of youth development provinces and the common prosperity index is as follows: youth health 0.912＞youth marriage and love 0.885＞youth thinking 0.883＞youth entrepreneurship and employment 0.869 ＞ youth education 0.829 ＞ youth social participation 0.581＞youth social security 0.574.It can be seen that youth health, marriage and love, thinking, entrepreneurship and employment and education have a strong correlation with common prosperity.Common wealth has a strong correlation.

Analysis of the results of the coupled coordination model
The results of the model analysis of the degree of coupled coordination between the two systems of quality U1 and common wealth U2 in the youthdeveloping provinces are shown in Table 5: From the results of the coupling degree analysis, it can be seen that the coupling degree between the quality of youth development-oriented provinces and the common wealth index in Zhejiang Province fluctuates from 0.924 in 2017 to 0.991 in 2021, which is in the advanced coupling stage for a long time.This indicates that there is a strong mutual influence relationship between the two systems of youth development-oriented province construction and common wealth in Zhejiang Province in the long term.
From the results of the analysis of the coupling coordination degree, it can be seen that the coupling coordination degree of the quality of youth developmental provinces in Zhejiang Province and the common wealth index fluctuates and rises from 0.777 in 2017 to 0.962 in 2021, and the two are still in the intermediate coordination stage during 2017 and 2018, and gradually rise to the advanced coordination stage since the beginning of 2019 to 2021, which suggests that the two systems have a positive, mutually reinforcing effect.

reach a verdict
(1) There is a strong correlation between quality improvement in youth-developing provinces and the degree of shared regional prosperity.
(2) All five elements of youth health, marriage, thinking, entrepreneurship and employment, and education are strongly correlated with the degree of realization of regional common wealth.
(3) Youth development provinces and common prosperity have a reciprocal and mutually reinforcing relationship.

Improve the construction of the "Asian
Games City" and create a good health environment for young people.
Schools should comprehensively promote the construction of an education system for the physical and mental health of young students.Implement health and fitness testing and establish the guiding principle of 'health first'.Reasonably interspersed with outdoor sports in daily learning life to enhance students' physical fitness, and cultivate students into high-quality talents with all-round development of morality, intelligence, physical fitness, aesthetics and labor.The government should establish a sound mechanism to incorporate youth health promotion into the basic public assessment indicators for building the "Asian Games City".

Enhancing the sense of well-being in the provinces and promoting the comprehensive development of young minds.
The Government should help to enhance the sense of well-being in the provinces by improving the employment, income, security and social security systems, creating a quality of life in the provinces, guaranteeing that people can live and work in peace and contentment, enhancing the sense of security of the population, guaranteeing that everyone can enjoy the freedoms and rights granted by the law, and helping young people to positively create their own personal and social values and create a positive psychological experience.

Promoting employment and facilitating the expansion of youth employment.
The Government should further increase investment in support of youth entrepreneurship training.Encourage more social forces to participate in the training and support of youth entrepreneurship, and give corresponding subsidies to expand the service content and effect of training.Not only that, society should also help optimize the environment for youth employment creation.Ideology: help young people to establish a correct concept of employment, excellent job creation youth report show, report, employment and entrepreneurship apprenticeship and other forms, to update the youth and even the whole society's entrepreneurial outlook, abandon the old ideas.Mechanisms: Continuously improve policies and regulations on entrepreneurial investment, assist various types of financial institutions, create a unified and systematic entrepreneurial platform, and realize the sharing and interoperability of social resources.In terms of higher education, we should provide training services for fresh graduates, actively organize local enterprises to enter campuses, and carry out campus recruitment campaigns; secondly, we can open vocational skills training and vocational skills appraisal points on campus, and popularize all kinds of vocational qualification certificates and preferential policies, so as to improve the competitiveness of students in employment and the success rate of their employment.

Optimizing the educational environment and creating an educational environment in which young people can learn.
From the government's point of view, efforts can be made to broaden the channels for mobilizing education funds and to raise the province's investment in education.Establish a sound mechanism for the operation of education funding, and implement the flow of each expenditure.Ensure that the funds for running schools, various types of subsidies and career funds are allocated in full and on time.The government also needs to pay attention to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of teachers and improving their salaries and benefits.Enhance the social identity of teachers and strengthen the teaching force.From the perspective of the school, you can improve all kinds of infrastructure within the school, to provide students with a good learning environment, and maintain a normal education and teaching order.In the selection and hiring of the teacher team, prudent investigation and decisionmaking, responsible for the students, responsible for the school.In addition, families should also pay attention to youth education, in their daily lives, to provide a stable educational environment for children, parents and elders of special families should pay more attention to their children's psychological and personality problems, and cultivate young people to become well-rounded, psychologically healthy, good at learning, moral and aptitude of the pillars of the talent.The Government, schools and families need to cooperate with each other to form a good education development system and create an educational environment in which young people can learn.
Number of theaters per 10,000 people in the provinces Value added per capita in the regional tourism industry Average years of schooling of the working-age population Gross enrolment ratio in tertiary education Pass rate of sample test on physical fitness of students in tertiary 1 indicators Secondary indicators Youth Development Provincial System ideological and moral Number of young party members (age 35 and below) Youth education Gross enrolment rate in upper secondary education Gross enrolment ratio in tertiary education University students per 1,000 population Share of residents' expenditure on cultural, educational and recreational services in household consumption expenditure Value added of culture and related industries per capita

Table 2
Coupling/coherence degree stage division

Table 3
Quality index of youth-developing provinces and common prosperity index

Table 4
Gray correlation evaluation results

Table 5
Results of the analysis of the coupled harmonization of quality and common prosperity in youth-developing provinces