EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 232 (2026) SHS Web Conf., 232 (2026) 04003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2026
10e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Histoire, épistémologie, réflexivité
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623204003
Published online 15 June 2026
  1. G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh (Basic Books, New York, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Lakoff, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  3. R.W. Langacker, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  4. F.J. Varela, E. Thompson, E. Rosch, The Embodied Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1991). [Google Scholar]
  5. H.R. Maturana, F.J. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980). [Google Scholar]
  6. E.C. Traugott, G. Trousdale, Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (Oxford University Press, New York, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  7. J.-L. Bybee, Language, Usage and Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Pulvermüller, Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 576–582 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706 [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Gallese, G. Lakoff, The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 455–479 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Johnson, The Body in the Mind (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980). [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Barsalou, Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577–660 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149 [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Rosch, Natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 4, 328–350 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Rosch, Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Exp. Psychol. 104, 192–233 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Rosch, Principles of categorization, in E. Rosch, B.B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 27–48 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1978). [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Mervis, E. Rosch, Categorization of natural objects. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 32, 89–115 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  17. A.E. Goldberg, Constructionist approaches, in T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Carlier, S. Prévost, Constructions, constructionnalisation et changement linguistique. Langue française 209, 9–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.209.0009 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Barlow, S. Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language Use (CSLI Publications, Stanford, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Noël, The development of non-deontic BE BOUND TO in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua. 199, 72–93 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. E.C. Traugott, Discourse Structuring Markers in English (John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  22. E.C. Traugott, Subjectification in grammaticalization, in D. Stein, S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 31–54 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  23. R.W. Langacker, Subjectification. Cogn. Linguist. 1, 5–38 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Stein, S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation (Cambridge University Press, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Breban, Grammaticalization and subjectification of English adjectives expressing difference into plurality/distributivity markers and quantifiers. Folia Linguistica 42, 259–306 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Davidse L. Vandelanotte, H. Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Degand, A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of discourse markers, Linguistics, 49-2, 287–294 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. F. de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (Payot, Paris, 1995 [1916]). [Google Scholar]
  29. N. Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1965). [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding (Foris, Dordrecht, 1981). [Google Scholar]
  31. D. Lightfoot, The Development of Language (Blackwell, Oxford, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  32. J.A. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1983). [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Lightfoot, Principles of Diachronic Syntax (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979). [Google Scholar]
  34. T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  35. C.J. Fillmore, The case for case, in E. Bach, R.T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88 (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968). [Google Scholar]
  36. A.E. Goldberg, Constructions. A construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Israel, The way constructions grow, in A.E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 217–230 (CSLI Publ., Stanford, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  38. P. Kay, C.J. Fillmore, Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations. The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75, 1–34 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  39. W. Croft, Construction grammar, in D. Geeraerts et H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 463–508 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  40. A.E. Goldberg, Constructions at work. Cogn. Linguist. 14, 219–224 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  41. W. Croft, D.A. Cruse, Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  42. C.J. Fillmore, P. Kay, M. O’Connor, Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64, 501–538 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. C.J. Fillmore, Berkeley Construction Grammar, in T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 111–132, (Oxford University Press, New York, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Legallois, P. Gréa, La notion de construction. Cah. Crisco 21, 5–20 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  45. R.W. Langacker, Investigations in Cognitive Grammar (Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  46. R.W. Langacker, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar II: Descriptive Application (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1991). [Google Scholar]
  47. R.W. Langacker, Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so, in Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Peña Cervel (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159 (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  48. W. Croft, Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  49. W. Croft, Radical Construction Grammar, in T. Hoffmann, G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232, (Oxford University Press, New York, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  50. R.W. Langacker, Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction (Oxford University Press, New York, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  51. D. Legallois, La notion de construction. Encyclopédie grammaticale du français (2016). https://encyclogram.fr. [Google Scholar]
  52. L. Ben Hamad, Qu’est-ce qu’une construction ? Bull. Soc. Linguist. Paris CXV-1, 103–140 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  53. J. François (ed.), L’expansion des grammaires de constructions (PUC, Caen, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  54. D. Legallois, j. François (éd.), cah. Crisco, 21 : Autour des grammaires de constructions et de patterns (2006). [Google Scholar]
  55. V. Evans, M. Green, Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  56. J. François, Les Grammaires de construction, un bâtiment ouvert aux quatre vents, Cah. Crisco, 26 (2008). http://www.crisco.unicaen.fr/IMG/pdf/Cahier_CRISCO_26 [Google Scholar]
  57. M. Hilpert, Construction Grammar and its Application to English (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  58. D. Legallois, A. Patard (eds.), Les constructions comme unités de la langue : illustrations, évaluation, critique, Langue française, 194, 2017. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.