EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 232 (2026) SHS Web Conf., 232 (2026) 09007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2026
10e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 09007
Number of page(s) 15
Section Phonétique, phonologie et interfaces
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623209007
Published online 15 June 2026
  1. S. Cenoz, U. Jessner, Research on Multilingual Acquisition. English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language (Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Sharwood Smith, E. Kellerman, Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1986) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Jarvis, A. Pavlenko, Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition (Routledge, New York & London, 2008). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927 [Google Scholar]
  4. X. Wang, F. Nuance, Dynamic effects of L2 on L3 phonology. Lang. Acquis. (2023). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Wrembel, U. Gut, R. Kopečková, A. Balas, The relationship between the perception and production of L2 and L3 rhotics in young multilinguals. Int. J. Multiling. 21, 92–111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2022.2036158 [Google Scholar]
  6. U. Gut, R. Kopečková, C. Nelson, Phonetics and Phonology in Multilingual Language Development (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  7. Bardel, Y. Falk, The role of the L2 in L3 acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Lang. Res. 23, 459–484 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557 [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo, Y., Revisiting the L2 factor in third language acquisition: A brief literature review. Iris J. Educ. Res. 4, 000594 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  9. Hermas, Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. Int. J. Multiling. 7, 343–362 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Westergaard, N. Mitrofanova, R. Mykhaylyk, Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. Int. J. Biling. 21, 666–682 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. C. B. Chang, Phonetic drift. In M. S. Schmid & B. Köpke (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition, 191–203. Oxford University Press, Oxford, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. J.E. Flege, O.-S. Bohn, The revised Speech Learning Model. In R. Wayland (ed.), Second Language Speech Learning, Theoretical and Empirical Progress, 85–113. Cambridge University Press (2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Slabakova, The Scalpel Model: Structural Similarity and Transfer in Third Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. Rothman, J., Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 18, 179–190 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Kopečková, Perception development of L2 English and L3 Polish coda obstruents by L1 German adult multilinguals. Languages 10, 10 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  16. X. Wang, Y. Zhu, The contribution of linguistic distance to L3 learning motivation: A cross-L2 comparison. Educ. Sci. 14, 1271 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  17. Jongman, R. Wayland, S. Wong, Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1252–1263 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  18. Chan, A. Y. W., & Li, D. C. S., English and Cantonese phonology in contrast: Explaining Cantonese ESL learners’ English pronunciation problems. Lang. Cult. Curriculum 13, 67–85 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666590 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Philippart de Foy, V. Delvaux, K. Huet, M. Monnier, M. Piccaluga, B. Harmegnies, Émergence du contraste entre les fricatives sibilantes /s/ - /ʃ/ du français en contexte d’acquisition bilingue. Proc. JEP‑TALN‑RECITAL 33, 498–506 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Lee, Perception and production of English fricatives by Chinese learners of English: Error patterns and perception-production relationship. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 13(1), 25–36 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Chen, J. van de Weijer, The role of L1-L2 dissimilarity in L2 segment learning – Implications from the acquisition of English post- alveolar fricatives by Mandarin and Mandarin/Wu speakers. Front. Psychol. 13, 1017724 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Roach, English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Recasens, On the articulatory classification of (alveolo)palatal consonants. J. Int. Phon. Assoc. 43, 1–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100312000199 [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Zee, Chinese (Hong Kong Cantonese). J. Int. Phonetic Assoc. 21, 1–34 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  25. B.R. Huang, X.D. Liao, Chinois moderne. Beijing Higher Education Press. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  26. W.-S. Lee, An articulatory and acoustical analysis of the syllable-initial sibilants and approximant in Beijing Mandarin. In Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Phonetic Sci. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Zharkova, Differentiating tongue shapes for alveolar-post alveolar and alveolar- velar contrasts. Speech Commun. 113, 15–24 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Zhang, J. Xiao, An analysis of Chinese students’ perception and production of paired English fricatives: From an ELF perspective. J. Pan-Pacific Assoc. Appl. Linguist. 18, 171–192 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Boersma, D. Weenink, Praat: doing phonetics by computer, Version 6.3 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  30. OriginLab Corporation, OriginPro 2025 (OriginLab Corporation, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Wottawa, M. Adda-Decker, Putting German [ʃ] and [ç] in two different boxes: Native German vs L2 German of French learners. Interspeech, 457, 197 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  32. K.N. Stevens, Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press (1989). [Google Scholar]
  33. Hennen, E. Koffi, The acoustics of coda devoicing in a Central Minnesota English idiolect. Ling. Portf. 6, Article 7 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  34. L. T. Nguyen, Analyse contrastive des systèmes phonologiques français et vietnamien. VNU J. Sci., Foreign Lang., 28, 130–144 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Dong, B., Liang, J., & Yao, Q. Retroflex and non-retroflex laterals in the Zibo dialect of Chinese. J. Int. Phon. Assoc. 54(2), 1–31 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  36. C.-Y. Lee, Y. Zhang, X. Li, Acoustic characteristics of voiceless fricatives in Mandarin Chinese. J. Chin. Linguist. 42, 150–171 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. X. Y. Yang, The influence of retroflex sounds on Cantonese-speaking students learning Mandarin and countermeasures. Exploring Teaching Pract. (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.