EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 232 (2026) SHS Web Conf., 232 (2026) 12009 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2026
10e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 12009
Number of page(s) 18
Section Sémantique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623212009
Published online 15 June 2026
  1. G. Lakoff, G., M. Johnson, Metaphor we live by (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1980). [Google Scholar]
  2. Z. Kövecses, Where metaphors come from (Oxford University Press, New York, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Lakoff, Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Lakoff, The contemporary theory of metaphor, in Metaphor and thought (2nd éd.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Reddy, The conduit metaphor, in Metaphor and thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979). [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Kleiber, Du triple sens de métaphore, Langue Fr., 189, 15–34, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Johnson, The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Johnson, Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: how our bodies give rise to understanding (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Ricœur, Philosophie de la volonté. Le volontaire et l’involontaire (Aubier, Paris, 1949). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. W. Langacker, Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. (Stanford University Press, Standford, CA, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Haiman, Natural syntax: iconicity and erosion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985). [Google Scholar]
  12. C. M. Brugman, G. Lakoff, Cognitive topology and lexical networks, in Cognitive linguistics: basic readings (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Dodge, G. Lakoff, Image schemas: from linguistic analysis to neural grounding, in From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. R. W. Gibbs, H. L. Colston, The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformation, Cogn. Linguist., 6, 347–378, (1995). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Johnson, Knowing through the body, Philos. Psychol., 4, 3–18, (1991) [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Hampe, J. E. Grady, From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. E. Grady, Foundations of meaning: primary metaphor and primary scenes, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkley (1997). [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought (Basic Books, New York, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Sweetser, From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Talmy, Toward a cognitive semantics (Volumes I-II) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Norvig, G. Lakoff, Taking: a study in lexical network theory, in Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, BLS, Berkeley, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  22. C. M. Brugman, Story of over (University of California, Berkely, 1981). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Cruse, La signification des noms propres de pays en anglais, in Les mots de la nation (Presses Universitaires de Lyon, Lyon, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Gross, Définition et reconstruction du sens, in La définition (Larousse, Paris, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Kleiber, Problèmes de sémantique. La polysémie en questions (Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, Paris, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  26. R. W. Langacker, Grammar and conceptualization (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  27. R. W. Langacker, Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Nunberg, The pragmatics of reference (Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, 1978). [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Nunberg, A. Zaenen, La polysémie systématique dans la description lexicale, Langue fr., 113, 12–23, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Pustejovsky, The generative lexicon (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  31. R. W. Langacker, Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 1991). [Google Scholar]
  32. Z. Kövecses, Metaphor: a practical introduction (2nd éd.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Lakoff, Neural theory of metaphor, in The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  34. R. W. Gibbs, Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Feldman, S. Narayanan, Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language, Brain Lang., 89, 385–392, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Feldman, From molecule to metaphor (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  37. B. Bowdle, D. Gentner, The career of metaphor. Psychol. Rev., 112, 193–216. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Yu, Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese, Metaphor Symb. Act., 10, 59–92. (1995). [Google Scholar]
  39. N. Yu, The contemporary theory of metaphor: a perspective from Chinese (John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1998). [Google Scholar]
  40. Z. Kövecses, Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: a lexical approach to the study of concepts (John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1986). [Google Scholar]
  41. Z. Kövecses, The language of love: the semantics of passion in conversational English (Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg, Pa., 1988). [Google Scholar]
  42. Z. Kövecses, Emotion concepts (Springer Verlag, New York, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Glucksberg, How metaphors create categories – quickly, in The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  44. N. Carroll, A note on film metaphor, J. Pragmat., 26, 809–822, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Cienki, C. Müller, Metaphor and gesture (John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Forceville, Pictorial metaphor in advertising (Routledge, London and New York, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  47. C. Forceville, Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials, Public J. Semiot., 1, 15–34, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  48. P. Ricœur, La métaphore vive (Seuil, Paris, 1975). [Google Scholar]
  49. J-M. Klinkenberg, Le sens rhétorique. Essais de sémantique littéraire (Éditions du GREF & Les Éperonniers, Toronto & Bruxelles, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Black, Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy (Cornell University Press, New York, 1962). [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Black, More about metaphor, Dialectica, 31, 431–457, (1977). [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Prandi, L’interaction métaphorique : une grandeur algébrique, Protée, 38, 75–84, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Prandi, Conceptual conflicts in metaphors and figurative language (Routledge, New York, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  54. E. M. Lemghari, L’extension métaphorique des noms d’animaux, une affaire de métaphores stéréotypiques, in Polysémie et Référence (Epuré, Reims, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  55. G. Kleiber, L’article LE générique. La généricité sur le mode massif (Librairie Droz, Genève-Paris, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  56. G. Kleiber, Nominales. Essais de sémantique référentielle (Armand Colin, Paris, 1994). [Google Scholar]
  57. E. M. Lemghari, La structure syntactico-sémantique de jouer dans la construction [Jouer + du + Nom d’instrument de musique] : une affaire de zone active massive, Trav. Ling., 80, 63–83, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  58. S. Glucksberg, C. Haught, Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail, Psychol. Sci., 17, 935–938, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  59. S. Glucksberg, C. Haught, On the relation between metaphor and simile: when comparison fails, Mind Lang., 21, 360–378, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  60. G. Steen, The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor Symb., 23, 213–241, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  61. G. Steen, The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Rev. Cogn. Linguist., 9, 26–64, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  62. G. Steen, Developing, testing, and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. J. Pragmat., 90, 67–72, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  63. R. W. Gibbs, Embodiment and cognitive science (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  64. R.W. Gibbs, Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor. Soc. World, 1, 26–52, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  65. R.W. Gibbs, E. Chen, Metaphor and the automatic mind. Metaphor. Soc. World, 8, 40–63, (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.