Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 233, 2026
17th International Conference of the European Architectural Envisioning Association (EAEA17 2026)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 13
Section Projection as Ideation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623302007
Published online 06 July 2026
  1. M. Coverley, Psikocoğrafya: Londra yazıları, trans. S. Serezli (Kalkedon Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. T. McDonough, Guy Debord and the Situationist International: Texts and documents (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Cerasi, The formation of Ottoman house types: A comparative study in interaction with neighboring cultures. Muqarnas 15, 116–156 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993-90000412 [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Kuban, Ottoman Architecture, trans. A. Mill (Antique Collectors’ Club, Woodbridge, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Debord, Introduction to a critique of urban geography. Les Lèvres Nues 6 (1955) [Google Scholar]
  6. Z.R. Kriegler-Wenk, J.C. Green, Psychogeography as embodied connection to place. AMA J. Ethics 27, E490–E495 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.490 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Kim, The pedagogical effects of psychogeographic urban exploration and mapping. Geography 106, 69–79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2021.1919412 [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. İlkay, Psychogeography in planning: A new methodological approach via representations of “body”, “urban space” and “walking”. ICONARP Int. J. Archit. Plan. 11, 584–603 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.255 [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Yorgancıoğlu, I. Çalak, A methodological inquiry for re-structuring spatial knowledge derived from bodily-experience: Experiential mapping. Megaron 15, 126 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Giordano, F. Pagliuca, Consciously uncontrolled: A psychogeographic approach to urban mapping. In: C. Boano, G. Astolfo (eds.), Producing: Volume 3 (Mapping urbanities: Morphologies, flows, possibilities), pp. 163–181 (UCL Press, London, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Sadler, The situationist city (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Ummihusna, M. Zairul, N.Z. Harun, Immersive virtual reality in experiential learning for architecture design education: An action research. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 17, 738–758 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2023-0266 [Google Scholar]
  13. T.R. Baker, J. Kerski, N.T. Huynh, K. Viehrig, S.W. Bednarz, A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning. J. Geogr. 114, 118–130 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.950684 [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Young, V. Ferretti, D. Grossman, Mobile mapping and its potential for faculty collaboration and undergraduate student learning. ILCEA 36 (2019). https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/8792 [Google Scholar]
  15. J.F. Raposo Grau, M.A. Salgado de la Rosa, B. Butragueño Díaz-Guerra, S. Jiménez Martín, Analog drawing – digital drawing. In: J.F. Raposo Grau et al. (eds.), Springer series in design and innovation (Springer, Cham, 2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.