Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 103, 2021
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Solovyov Historical and Philosophical Readings. Russian and Foreign Experience in the System of Humanities Education: History, Modernity, Prospects” 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01020 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Humanitarian Education as a Factor in the Socio-political, Economic and Cultural Development of Russian Society: Historical and Philosophical | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110301020 | |
Published online | 04 May 2021 |
Designing subject-subject relations on the basis of analysis of individual features of students’ thinking
1
Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Problems, Research Department, Kazan, Russia
2
Ivan Jakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University, Humanitary Sciences Department, Cheboksary, Russia
3
Bryansk Polytechnic University, Department of Philosophy and History, Bryansk, Russia
4
Kazan Federal University, Automotive Department, Department of Automobile Transport Operation, Kazan, Russia
5
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Moscow, Russia
* Corresponding author: kamaleyeva_kazan@mail.ru
This article discusses determination of prevailing thinking style of students with possible typology of the thinking styles. Determination of prevailing thinking style is required to determine strategy and tactics of teaching and maximum use of student-centered results of the performed diagnostics during designing further successful subject–subject interaction. The relevance of the considered problem is related with the necessity to resolve the issue of optimum use of individual features of students’ thinking, future lawyers, regarding development of analytical thinking style. It is proposed that the research method should be based on the diagnostics by A. Alekseev and L. Gromova, Individual Thinking Styles, its aim is analysis of individual thinking styles. It has been established that the proposed method provides analysis of basic thinking styles of the students: synthetic, idealistic, pragmatic, analytical, realistic. The obtained data would allow each teacher to design respective arrangement of subjectsubject interactions and to rearrange methods of teaching the involved discipline with orientation at personal features of cognitive tools of each student individually and in overall group.
Key words: subject-subject interactions / cognitive didactics / cognitive tools / thinking style / cognitive activity
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.