EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2012) SHS Web of Conferences, 2 (2012) 00007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 2, 2012
3rd International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE –1st Congress of Rehabilitation Doctors of Latvia
Article Number 00007
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20120200007
Published online 17 October 2012
  1. Brattberg, G., Thorslund, M., Wikman, A. (1989) The prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county of Sweden. Pain, 37, p. 215–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson, H.I., Ejlertsson, G., Leden, I., Rosenberg, C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain, 1993, 9, p. 174–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gerdle, B., Björk, J., Henriksson, C., Bengtsson, A. Prevalence of current and chronic pain and their influences upon work and healthcare-seeking: a population study. J Rheumatol, 2004, 31, p. 399–406. [Google Scholar]
  4. Elliott, A.M., Smith, B.H., Penny, K.I., Smith, W.C., Chambers, W.A. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet, 1999, 354:1248–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brevik, H., Colett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., Gallagher, D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain, 2006, 10, p. 287–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pain proposal. Improving the Current and Future Management of Chronic Pain. A European Consensus Report, 2010. www.pfizer.com. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pain in Europe. The Swedish Association of Pain Management in cooperation with Mundipharma, 2003. www.painineurope.com. [Google Scholar]
  8. Malone, M.D., Strube, M.J. Meta-analysis of non-medical treatments for chronic pain. Pain, 1988, 34, p. 231–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Flor, H., Fydric, T., Turk, D.S. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain, 1992, 49, p. 221–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morley, S., Eccleston, C., Williams, A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain, 1999, 80, p. 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karjalainen, K., Malmivaara, A., van Tulder, M., Roine, R., Jauhiainen, M., Hurri, H., et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults. The Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, 2001, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002194. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002194. [Google Scholar]
  12. Karjalainen, K.A., Hurri, H., Jauhiainen, M., Koes, B.W., Malmivaara, A., Roine, R., et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for fibromyalgia and musculoskeletal pain in working age adults. The Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, 1999, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001984. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001984. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guzmán, J., Esmail, R., Karjalainen, K., Malmivaara, A., Irvin, E., Bombardier, C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ, 2001, 322, p. 1511–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nielson, W.R., Weir, R. Biopsychosocial approaches to the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain, 2001, 17, S 114–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marhold, C., Linton, S.J., Melin, L. A cognitive-behavioral return-to-work program: effects on pain patients with a history of long-term versus short-term sick-leave. Pain, 2001, Mar, 91(1-2), p. 155–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oliver, K. A review of multidisciplinary interventions for fibromyalgia patients: where do we go from here? J Musculoskeletal Pain, 2001, 9, p. 63–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shonstein, E., Kenny, D.T., Keating, J., Koes, B.W. Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003, (1): CD001822. [Google Scholar]
  18. SBU. The Swedish council of technology assessment in health care. Back pain, neck pain. An evidence based review. (In Swedish) (Ont i ryggen, ont i nacken: en evidensbaserad kunskapssammanställning). Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU); 2000. SBU-rapport nr 145/2, p. 72. [Google Scholar]
  19. SBU. The Swedish council on technology assessment in health care. Methods of treating chronic pain. A systematic review. (In Swedish) (Metoder för behandling av långvarig smärta. En systematisk litteraturöversikt). Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU); 2006 SBU-rapport nr 177/1, p. 159–190. [Google Scholar]
  20. SBU. Swedish Council on Heath Technology Assessment. Rehabilitation by long-term pain. A systematic review. (In Swedish) Rehabilitering vid långvarig smärta. En systematisk litteraturöversikt. Partiell uppdatering och fördsjupning av SBU-rapport 177/1+2. (SBU); 2010 SBU-rapport nr 198. [Google Scholar]
  21. Norrefalk, J.R., Svensson, O., Ekholm, J., Borg, K. Can the back-to-work rate of patients with long-term non-malignant pain be predicted? Int J Rehabil Res, 2005, 28(1), p. 9–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Norrefalk, J.R., EkholmJ., BorgK. Ethnic background does not influence outcome for return-to-work in work-related interdisciplinary rehabilitation for long-term pain: 1- and 3-year follow-up. J Rehabil Med, 2006, 38(2), p. 87–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. NorrefalkJ.R., Ekholm, J., Linder, J., Borg, K. A 6-year follow-up study of 122 patients attending a multiprofessional rehabilitation program for persistent musculoskeletal-related pain. Int J Rehabil Res, 2007, 30(1), p. 9–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Norrefalk, J.R., Ekholm, K., Linder, J., Borg, K., Ekholm, J. Evaluation of a multiprofessional rehabilitation programme for persistent musculoskeletal-related pain: economic benefits of return to work. J Rehabil Med, 2008, 40, p. 15–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Main, C.J. The modified somatic perception questionnaire. J Psychosomatic Res, 1983, 27, >p. 503–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Salén, B.A., Spangfort, E.V., Nygren, Å.L., Nordemar, R. The disability rating index: an instrument for assessments of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol, 1994, 47, p. 1423–1434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chapman, S.L., Brena, S.F., Bradford, L.A. Treatment outcome in a chronic pain rehabilitation program. Pain, 1981, 11, p. 255–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roberts, A., Reinhardt, L. The behavioral management of chronic pain: longterm follow up with comparison groups. Pain, 1980, 8, p. 151–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mayer, T.G., Gratchel, R.J., Mayer, H., Kishino, N., Keeley, J., Mooney, V. A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure. JAMA, 1987, 258, p. 1763–1767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.