Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 10, 2014
4th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY, HEALTH, WELFARE
Article Number 00020
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141000020
Published online 05 September 2014
  1. Anonymous (2007). Veselibas aprūpes organizēšanas un finansēšanas kārtiba. MK noteikumi Nr.1046 [The Order of Health Care Organisation and Finincing], The Government of Latvia. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Boronenko, V. (2003). Veselibas aprūpes pakalpojumu pieejamiba [Accessibility of Health Care Services]. Riga: Sarosa fonds. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyce, W., Ballantyne, S. (2000). Developing CBR Through Evaluation, Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, (1), 69–83. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dervinika, A., Pujate, N. (2003). Kāda ir specifika aprūpei mājās laukos [What is the specifics of health care at home in rural area], Socialais darbinieks(3), SDUSPA Attistiba. (In Latvian) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edmonds, L.J., Peat, M. (1997). Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) and Health, Reform: A Timely Strategy. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 10 (4), 273–283. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hahn, H. (1991). Alternative Views of Empowerment: Social Services and Civil Rights, Journal of Rehabilitation, 5 (4), 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lang, R. (1999). Empowerment and CBR? Issues raised by the South Indian experience. In Stone, E. (Ed.), Disability and Development: Learning from action and research on disability in the majority world, Leeds, England: The Disability Press, (pp. 130–148). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laškova, J., Gutjare, I. (2003). Standartu loma sociālā darbā [The Role of Standards in Social Work] 8.sēj., SDUSPA Attistiba (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  9. McConkey, R., OToole, B. (1998). A Training Strategy for Personal Working in Developig Countries, International Joural of Rehabilitation Research 21, 311–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Šilneva, L. (2004). Sociālo projektu un sociālo pakalpojumu programmu novērtēšana [Valuation of Social Projects and Social Services], Sociālais Darbinieks, SDUSPA Attistiba, 1. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Twile, R.L., Henley, E.C. (1993). A Curriculum Model for a Community Development Approach to Community-based Rehabilitation. Disability, Handicap & Society, 8(1), 143–157. [Google Scholar]
  12. Anonymous (1997). Ārstniecibas likums [Medical Treatment Law], The Government of Latvia. [Google Scholar]
  13. Anonymous (2010). Invaliditātes Likums [Disability Law], The Government of Latvia. [Google Scholar]
  14. Anonymous (1922). Latvijas Republikas Satversme [The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia], The Government of Latvia. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Anonymous (2002). Likums par sociāliem pakalpojumiem un sociālo palidzibu [The Law on Social Services and Social Assistance], The Government of Latvia. [Google Scholar]
  16. Anonymous (2009). Pacientu tiesibu likums [Patients' Rights Law], The Government of Latvia. [Google Scholar]
  17. Helander, E. (1993). Prejudice and dignity: An introduction to community based on rehabilitation. New York: United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar]
  18. Leitarts, I. (2009). Sociālo pakalpojumu kvalitāte pilsētas un lauku iedzivotājiem Kandavas novadā [The Quality of Social Services in the City and Rural Area of Kandava], Maǵistra darbs, RSU. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  19. SIA “Konsorts” (2009). “Latvijas pilsētu un lauku teritoriju mijiedarbibas izvērtējums”. Gala zinojums. [The Valuation of Interaction Between Latvias' Cities and Rural Areas], Riga. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wallerstein, N. (1992). Powerlessness, Empowerment, and Health: Implications for Health Promotion Programs. American Journal of Health Promotion 6(3), 197–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.