EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2014) SHS Web of Conferences, 10 (2014) 00038 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 10, 2014
4th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY, HEALTH, WELFARE
Article Number 00038
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141000038
Published online 09 September 2014
  1. Beckung E., Hagberg G. (2002). Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 44: 309–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Parkes J., McCullough N., Madden A. (2010). To what extent do children with cerebral palsy participate in everyday life situations? Health and Social Care in the Community, 18 (3): 304–315. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lollar D., Simeonsson R., Nanda U. (2000). Measures of outcomes for children and youth. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81 (2): 46–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Perenboom R., Chorus A. (2003). Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), Disabil Rehabil, 25: 577–587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pasaules Veselıbas Organizācija (2001) Starptautiskā funkcionēšanas, nespējas un veselıbas klasifikācija [World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health] Ženēva, 3., 5., 10., 14.lpp. (in Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Kinsman S.L., Levey E., Ruffng V., Stone J., et al. (2000). Beyond: multidisciplinary care: a new conceptual model for spina bifida service. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 10 (1): 35–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dekker J. (1995). Application of the ICIDH in survey research on rehabilitation: the emergence of the functional diagnosis. Disability & Rehabilitation, 17 (3–4): 195–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cans C., Guillem P., Arnaud C. (2002). Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol, 44: 633–640. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hagberg B., Hagberg G., Olow I. (1993). The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. VI. Prevalence and origin during the birth year period 1983–1986. Acta Paediatr, 82: 387–393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bax M., Goldstein M., Rosenbaun P. (2005). Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol., 47: 571–576. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liptak G.S., Accardo P.J. (2004). Health and social outcomes of children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr, 145: 36–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morris C., Kurinczuk J. J., Fitzpatrick R., Rosenbaum P. L. (2006). Do the abilities of children with cerebral palsy explain their activities and participation? Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 48: 954–961. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kottorp A., Bernspång B., Fisher A. G. (2003). Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47 (8): 597–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Overview // http://www.ampsintl.com/AMPS/ (seen 26.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  15. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Benefits // http://www.ampsintl.com/AMPS/about/benefits.php (sk.10.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  16. Measures of Participation: CAPE & PAC // http://www.canchild.ca/en/measures/capepac.asp (seen 27.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  17. About the ASK // http://www.activitiesscaleforkids.com/?page_id=206 (seen 27.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  18. Bagley A. M., Narayanan U., Gorton G. E., Tucker C. A., et al. (2011).Factor- and item-level analyses of the 38-item Activities Scale for Kids–performance. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53: 161–166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Young N. L., Varni J. W., Snider L., McCormick A., et al. (2009). The Internet is valid and reliable for child-report: An example using the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62: 314–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Register to Download // http://www.activitiesscaleforkids.com/?page_id=46 (seen 29.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  21. Imms C. (2008). Review of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and the Preferences for Activity of Children. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 28 (4): 389–404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. King G. A., Law M., King S., Hurley P., et al. (2006). Measuring children's participation in recreation and leisure activities: construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33 (1): 28–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) // http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=076-1606-432&Mode=summary (seen 27.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  24. Cusick A., Lannin N. A., Lowe K. (2007). Adapting the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for use in a paediatric clinical trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29 (10): 761–766. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. COPM description // http://www.caot.ca/copm/description.html (seen 2012.22.03.). [Google Scholar]
  26. Verkerk G. J. Q., Jeanne M., Louwers A. M., Meester-Delver A., et al. (2006). The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20: 980–988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. COPM questions and answers // http://www.caot.ca/copm/questions.html#14 (seen 22.03. 2012.). [Google Scholar]
  28. COPM questions and answers // http://www.caot.ca/copm/questions.html#6 (seen 21.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  29. Harvey A., Hughes M., Baker R., Graham H. K., et al. (2010). Does parent report measure performance? A study of the construct validity of the Functional Mobility Scale. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52: 181–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Harvey A., Graham H. K., Morris M. E., Baker R., et al. (2007). The Functional Mobility Scale: ability to detect change following single event multilevel surgery. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49: 603–607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Graham H.K, Harvey A., Rodda J., Nattrass G.R., et al. (2004). The Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). J Pediatr Orthop, 24: 514–520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harvey A. R., Morris M. E., Graham H. K., Wolfe R., et al. (2010). Reliability of the Functional Mobility Scale for Children with Cerebral Palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 30 (2): 139–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gorton G. E., Tucker C. A., Stout J. L., Bagley A. M., et al. (2011). Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire 22-item skill set: factor and Rasch analyses. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53: 250–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. My Gillette Visit // http://www.gillettechildrens.org/default.cfm?pid=1.6.14.2# Center%20for%20Gait%20and%20Motion%20Analysis (seen 29.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  35. Overview // http://motorgrowth.canchild.ca/en/GMFM/overview.asp (seen 15.03. 2012.). [Google Scholar]
  36. Nelson L., Owens H., Hynan L. S., Iannaccone S. T., et al. (2006). The gross motor function measure is a valid and sensitive outcome measure for spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders, 16: 374–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Russell D., Rivard L., Bartlett D., Rosenbaum P. et al. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the GMFM-88, GMFM-66, GMFCS, GMPM & the Motor Growth Curves // http://motorgrowth.canchild.ca/en/GMFM/resources/FAQforMotorMeasures.pdf (seen 29.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  38. GMFM Score Sheets // http://motorgrowth.canchild.ca/en/GMFM/gmfmscoresheets. asp (seen 29.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  39. Gross Motor Performance Measure (GMPM) // http://www.canchild.ca/en/measures/gmpmqualityfm.asp (25.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  40. Boyce W.F., Gowland C., Rosenbaum P.L., Lane M., et al. (1995). The Gross Motor Performance Measure: validity and responsiveness of a measure of quality of movement. Phys Ther, 75: 603–613. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sorsdahl A. B., Moe-Nilssen R., Strand P. L. I. (2008). Observer reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, based on video Recordings. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50: 146–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mackie P. C., Jessen E. C., Jarvis S. N. (1998). The lifestyle assessment questionnaire: an instrument to measure the impact of disability on the lives of children with cerebral palsy and their families. Child: Care, Health and Development, 24 (6): 473–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kerr C., McDowell B., McDonough S. (2006). The relationship between gross motor function and participation restriction in children with cerebral palsy: an exploratory analysis. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33 (1): 22–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Noreau L., Lepage C., Boissiere L., Picard R., et al. (2007). Measuring participation in children with disabilities using the Assessment of Life Habits. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49: 666–671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Noreau L., Fougeyrollas P., Vincent C. (2002). The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil, 14 (3): 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  46. Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) information rec // http://www.ripph.qc.ca/?rub2= 4&rub=16&lang=en (seen 27.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  47. In Depth Review of Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) // http://www.medicine. mcgill.ca/strokengine-assess/module_lifeh_indepth-en.html#section3 (seen 22.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  48. Dijkers M.P., Whiteneck G., El-Jaroudi R. (2000). Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81 (12/2): 63–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Ravesteyn N. T., Verschuren O., Scholtes V. A., Dallmeijer A. J., et al. (2010). Measuring mobility limitations in children with cerebral palsy: content and construct validity of a mobility questionnaire (MobQues). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52: e229–e235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Ravesteyn N. T., Becher J. G., Dallmeijer A. J., Scholtes V. A., et al. (2010). Measuring mobility limitations in children with cerebral palsy: interrater and intrarater reliability of a mobility questionnaire (MobQues). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52: 194–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. De MobiliteitsVragenlijst (MoVra) (English: MobQues) // http://www.vumc.nl/afdelingen/revalidatiegeneeskunde/Onderzoek/klinischetrials/658043/ (seen 25.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang H. H., Liao H. F., Hsieh C. L. (2006). Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition for Children With Cerebral Palsy. Physical Therapy, 86 (10): 1351–1359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS–2) // http://psychcorp. pearsonassessments.com/haiweb/cultures/en-us/productdetail.htm?pid=076- 1618-21X&Community=CA_MedOT_AI_OT (seen 25.03.2012). [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Hartingsveldt M. J., Cup E. H.C., Oostendrop R. A.B. (2005). Reliability and validity of the fine motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales–2. Occupational Therapy International, 12 (1): 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Berg M., Jahnsen R., Frey Frøslie K., Hussain A. (2004). Reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 24 (3): 61–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wassenberg-Severijnen J. E., Custers J. W. H, Hox J. J, Vermeer A., et al. (2003). Reliability of the Dutch Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Clinical Rehabilitation, 17: 457–462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Custers J. W. H., Wassenberg-Severijnen J. E., Van der Net J., Vermeer A., et al. (2002). Dutch adaptation and content validity of the “ Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)”. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24 (5): 250–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gates P. E., Otsuka N. Y., Sander J. O., McGee-Brown J. (2008). Relationship between parental PODCI questionnaire and School Function Assessment in measuring performance in children with CP. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50: 690–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tucker C. A., Dumas H. M., Gorton G. E., Haley S. M., et al. (2009). Development of a parent-report computer-adaptive test to assess physical functioning in children with cerebral palsy II: upperextremity skills. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51: 725–731. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Outcomes Instruments and Information // http://www.aaos.org/research/outcomes/outcomes_peds.asp (seen 28.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  61. Tucker C. A., Fragala-Pinkham M. A., Montpetit K., Hambleton R. K., et al. (2009). Development of a parent-report computer-adaptive test to assess physical functioning in children with cerebral palsy I: lowerextremity and mobility skills. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51: 717–724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tur B. S., Küç ükdevici A.A., Kutlay S., Yavuzer G., et al. (2009). Psychometric properties of the WeeFIM in children with cerebral palsy in Turkey. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51: 732–738. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lifetime Care and Support Authority. Frequently Asked Questions: FIM // http://www. lifetimecare.nsw.gov.au/fim_weefim.aspx (seen 18.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  64. Ziviani J., Ottenbacher K. J., Shephard K., Foreman S., et al. (2001). Concurrent Validity of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disabilities Inventory in Children with Developmental Disabilities and Acquired Brain Injuries. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 21 (2/3): 91–101. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jongjit J., Komsopapong L., Saikaew T., Wanich U., et al. (2006). Reliability of the Functional Independence Measure for children in normal Thai children. Pediatrics International, 48: 132–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Msall M. E., DiGaudio K., Rogers B. T., LaForest S. (1994). The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). Clinical Pediatrics, July: 421–430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Erkin G., Aybay C., Kurt M., Keles I., et al. (2005). The assessment of functional status in Turkish children with cerebral palsy (a preliminary study). Child: Care, Health & Development, 31 (6): 719–725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Gunel M. K., Mutlu A., Tarsuslu T., Livanelioglu A. (2009). Relationship among the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr, 168: 477–485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. FIM and WeeFIM© score sheets // http://www.lifetimecare.nsw.gov.au/fim_weefim. aspx (seen 29.03.2012.). [Google Scholar]
  70. Poulin V., Desrosiers J. (2009). Reliability of the LIFE-H satisfaction scale and relationship between participation and satisfaction of older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31 (16): 1311–1317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Gagnon C., Mathieu J., Noreau L. (2006). Measurement of participation in myotonic dystrophy: Reliability of the LIFE-H. Neuromuscular Disorders, 16: 262–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Noreau L., Desrosiers J., Robichaud L., Fougeyrollas P., et al. (2004). Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26 (6): 346–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Desrosiers J., Noreau L., Robichaud L., Viscogliosi C., et al. (2004). Validity of the assessment of Life Habits in older adults. J Rehabil Med, 36: 177–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lemmens J., van Engelen E. I. S. M., Post M. W.M., Beurskens A. J. H. M., et al. (2007). Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21: 853–862. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sakzewski L., Boyd R., Ziviani J. (2007). Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49: 232–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Morris C., J. J. Kurinczuk J. J., Fitzpatrick R. (2005). Child or family assessed measures of activity performance and participation for children with cerebral palsy: a structured review. Child: Care, Health & Development, 31, (4): 397–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Harvey A., Robin J., Morris M. E., Graham H. K., et al. (2008). A systematic review of measures of activity limitation for children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50: 190–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.