Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 23, 2016
PSU-USM-NSTRU 2014 International Conference on Arts and Sciences 2014 “Arts and Sciences Research 2014: Spot of Change for Tomorrow”
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 16
Section Tourism, Economy and Sustainability
Published online 06 January 2016
  1. Abdullah, Alias, M. Zainora Asmawi & Lukman Hakim Mahamod (2004). Planning Support System for Modelling Water Resource: Case Analysis of Gombak, Selangor. Application of Planning and Decision Support Systems, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atauri, J.A, Mugica, M., Ramirez-Sanz, L. & de Lucio, J.V (2000) Assessment of nature conservation scenarios : Species or landscape structure ? A case study in the Madrid region (Spain). In Mander, U, Jongman, R.H.G (Editors) Landscape Perspectives of Land Use Changes: WIT Press, pp 167–190. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahaire, T. dan Elliot-White, M. (1999) The Application of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in Sustainable Tourism Planning: A Review, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol 7, 2, 159–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhattacharjee, R.B. (2012) Gaping chasm in accountability for hillslope safety, The Edge Financial Daily, 12 Oct 2012,, accessed date 18 Oct 2012 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carsjen, G.J. and van Lier, H.N. (2002) Fragmentation and Land-Use Planning-An Introduction, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, pp 79–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Couclelis, H. (1991) Requirements for planning relevant GIS: A spatial perspective. Papers in Regional Science, 70(1), 9–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Daliza Ariffin (2008) Alam Sekitar, Economi di Maju Seiring. Utusan Malaysia, 21/1/2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Department of Statistics, Malaysia (2010) Population Distribution and Basic Demographic Characteristics, 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eastman, J.R. (1999) Guide to GIS and Image Processing, Volume 2, Worcester: Clark Lab. [Google Scholar]
  10. EIA (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Procedure and Requirement in Malaysia,, accessed date 18 Oct 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Erkin, E and Usul, N (2005) Site Selection for New Tourism Types in Bodrum Peninsular, Mu_LA, Turkey, ESRI Users Conference 2005. accessed date 2 january 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fritz, S., See, L. and Carver, S. (2000) A fuzzy modelling approach to wild land mapping in Scotland”, In: Atkinson, P. and Martin, D. eds. Innovations in GIS 7: GIS and Geocomputation. London, Taylor & Francis, pp.219–239. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gue See Sew & Tan Yean Chin(2003) The engineering aspects of hill-site developments, paper presented at the Hillside Development-Issues and Challenges, 19-20 August 2003, Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar]
  14. Institute of Engineers, Malaysia - IEM (2000) Policies and Procedures for Mitigating the Risk of Landslide on Hil-site Development, Malaysia: IEM. [Google Scholar]
  15. JPBD (2011), Research Study on Design and Management Action Plan Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) in the Land Use Planning, Kuala Lumpur: Town and Country Planning Department,, accessed date 18 Oct 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. JPBD (2005) Draf Rancangan Struktur Negeri Kedah 2002-2020. Kedah: Town and Country Planning Department. [Google Scholar]
  17. JPBD (1997) Garis Panduan Pemeliharaan Topografi (Guidelines for Conserving Topography), Kuala Lumpur: Town and Country Planning Department. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lambin, E.F. (2005) Conditions for sustainability of human-environment systems: Information, motivation, and capacity, Editorial, Global Environmental Change, 15, pp 177–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Langkawi Municipal Council (2005) Rancangan Tempatan Daerah Langkawi 2001-2015, Kedah: Langkawi Municipal Council. [Google Scholar]
  20. le Clerq, F. (1990) Information management within the planning process. In Scholten, H.J. and Stillwell, J. (eds) Geographical Information Systems for Urban and Regional Planning, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  21. Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J., and Rhind, D.W., (2010) Geographic information systems and science. 4nd edition. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  22. Malaysia (2001) Eight Malaysia Plan 2001-2005. Kuala Lumpur: Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  23. Malcweski, J. (1999) GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  24. Norhidayah Harun (2012) Aplikasi Sistem Maklumat Geografi dan Penilaian Pelbagai Kriteria bagi Menentukan Kawasan Sensitif Alam Sekitar dalam Pembangunan Kawasan Pelancongan di Langkawi, Kedah, Tesis Sarjana Sastera (tidak diterbitkan) Universiti Sains Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  25. Samat, Narimah (2002). A geographic information system and cellular automata spatial model of urban growth for Penang State, Malaysia. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  26. Samat, Narimah (2007) Integrating Geographic Information System and Cellular Automata Model in Modelling Urban Spatial Growth: Prospects and Challenges”. Journal of Built Environment, 9 (1).77–91 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tourism Malaysia (2012) Tourists arrival and receipt in Malaysia, available at, accessed date 2 Febuary 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Thullen, S. (1996). Tourism and its Impacts on the Environment. Accessed from, accessed date 30 Jan 2012. [Google Scholar]
  29. Uran, O. and Janssen, R. (2003) Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol 27, pp 511–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Voogd, H. (1983) Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. London: Pion Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yaakup, A., & Baker, Abu, Zalina, Siti (2004). Integrated Land Use Assessment (ILA) Model: “What if“ Approach. Malaysia Townplan. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa, Semenanjung Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yaakup, Ahris, Johar, Foziah, Baker, Abu, Zalina, Siti, & Bajuri, Haibenarisal (2006).Pendekatan Penilaian Kawasan Sensitif Alam Sekitar Menggunakan Analisis Multi-Kriteria, Malaysia Journal of Environmental Management, 7, pp 43–57. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.