Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 25, 2016
ICITCE 2015 – 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and Career Education
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 6
Section Education and teaching
Published online 22 April 2016
  1. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.203. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dawkins, R. 1986. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.158. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackmore, S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.228–230. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackmore, S. 2001. Evolution and memes: The human brain as a selective imitation device. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, pp.225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. He Ziran. 2007. Linguistic memes and their rhetoric effects. Foreign Language Research, 101(3): 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xie Chaoqun & He Ziran. 2007. Brief introduction of language memes. Modern Foreign Languages (Quarterly), 30(1): 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  7. He Ziran. 2005. Meme in language. Language Science, 19(6): 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. He Ziran & He Xuelin. 2003. Memetics and social usage of language. Modern Foreign Language (Quarterly). 26(2): 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Bin. 2004. Memes and translation. Foreign Language Research, 85(3): 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Chunlei. 2008. Review of meme research, Journal of Jimei University, 11(3): 63. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Zaixin, et al. 1995. Main issues in college English writing in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 38(2): 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang Wenyu & Wang Lifei. 2004. Research of second language writing: Review and expectation of the past ten years, Foreign Language World. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen Linxia & He Ziran. 2006. Analysis of memes in language, Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 38(2): 108–114. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang Lu. 2007. Evaluating the Feasibility of Applying Memetics in ESL Writing Teaching, Hunan: Hunan University, pp: 56–58. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carrell, PL, Content and Formal Schemata in ESL reading, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 461–482, 1987. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henrik Bjarneskans, Bjarne Grnevik and Anders Sandberg. The Life Circle of Memes. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wary, Alison. 2000. Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice, Applied Linguistics, 21(4): 463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weinert, Regina. 1995. The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review, Applied Linguistics, 16(2): 180–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guy R. Lefrancois. 2004. Theories of Human Learning, Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, pp.235. [Google Scholar]
  20. Deng Liming & Wang Xiangyun, 2007. A study on the actual efficacy of recitation input for the development of Chinese college students’ L2 writing proficiency, Foreign Language Education, 28(4): 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  21. Krashen, S.D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, London: Longman Group Limited, pp. 175–182 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cao Yilu. 1999. Should borrow the teaching experience from Chinese traditional language teaching, Foreign Language World, 64(2): 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen Linxia. 2008. Memetics and the teaching of college English writing, Foreign Language Research, 140(1): 88–89. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.