SHS Web Conf.
Volume 33, 2017International Conference on Communication and Media: An International Communication Association Regional Conference (i-COME’16)
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Published online||02 February 2017|
- B. Pocock, B. The Work/life Collision: What Work is Doing to Australians and what to Do about it: The Federation Press (2003) [Google Scholar]
- Gallup News Service. Gallup Polll Social Series: Work and Education. In J. Jones & L. Saad (Eds.): Gallup News Service. (2005) [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Sipior, B. T. Ward, A Strategic Response to the Broad Spectrum of Internet Abuse. Inform Syst Magage, 19, 71–79 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. E. Lichtash, Inappropriate use of e-mail and the Internet in the workplace: The arbitration picture. Dispute Resolot J, 59, 26–36 (2004) [Google Scholar]
- J. E. Mills, B. Hu, S. Beldona, J. Clay, Cyberslacking! A liability Issue for Wired Workplaces. Cornell Hotel RestauR Adm, 42, 34–47 (2001) [Google Scholar]
- R. R. Panko, H. G. Beh, Monitoring for pornography and sexual harassment. Commun ACM, 45, 84–87 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. R. Scheuermann, H. P. Langford, H. P, Perceptions of Internet abuse, liability, and fair use. Percepl and Motor Skill, 85, 847–850 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. Websense, Web@Work Employee Computing Trends Survey (2006) [Google Scholar]
- MySammy, Cyberloafing Infographic: Personal Internet Use at Work Infographic. (2013) [Google Scholar]
- C .J. Case, K. S. Young, Employee Internet Management: Current Business Practices and Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 5, 355–361 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. C. Clark, Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Hum Relat, 53, 747–770 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. C. Triandis, Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behaviour. In H. Howe & M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979, 195–295. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press (1980) [Google Scholar]
- G. D. Moody, M. Siponen, Using the Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour to Explain Non-Work-Related Personal Use of the Internet at Work. Inform Manage, 50, 322–335 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. G. Pee, I. Woon, A. Kankaanhalli, A, Explaining non-work related computing in the workplace: A comparison of alternative models. Inform Manage, 45, 123–130 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- T. K. Betts, A. J. Setterstrom, J. M. Pearson, S. Totty, Explaining Cyberloafing through a Theoretical Integration of Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour and Theory of Organizational Justice. J Organ End User Comput, 26, 23–42 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Ugrin, M. J. Pearson, The Effects of Sanctions and Stigmas on Cyberloafing. Hum Behav, 29, 812–820 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. J. König, M. E. Caner de la Guardia, Exploring the Positive Side of Personal Internet Use at Work: Does It Help in Managing the Border between Work and Nonwork? Computer Human Behavior, 30, 355–360 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. R. Eddy, C. P. D’Abate, ThurstonP. W. Jr, Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time. PERS REV, 39, 639–654 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.