Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 36, 2017
The 2016 4th International Conference on Governance and Accountability (2016 ICGA)
Article Number 00031
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173600031
Published online 24 July 2017
  1. Abigail Barr M. F. & Owens T. (2005), The Governance of Nongovernmental organisations in Uganda, World Development, 33 (4), 657–679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal, R., Evans M.E., & Nanda, D. (2012). Nonprofit board: Size, performance and managerial incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53: 466–487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alregab, H. (2015). Does CEO pay enhance a firm’s performance? An empirical investigation of UK listed companies. Proceedings of the Eight Saudi Students Conference in the UK. 145–164. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anonymous, (2010, May 12), Ex-CEO Denies Deceit Over RM4mil. Retrieved July 05, 2010, from The Star Online: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/5/12/courts/6237943&sec=courts. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anonymous, (2015, Nov 23), 3,000 stop monthly contributions to YAPEIM fund, retrieved Jan 05, 2016, from Ashley, A. S., & Yang, S. S. (2004). Executive Compensation and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 369–382. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balsam, S. & Harris, E. E. (2015). Nonprofit executive incentive pay. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barros, C. P., & Nunes, F. (2007). Governance and CEO pay and performance in non-profit organisation. International Journal of Social Economics, 811–827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benito, A., & Conyon, M. J. (1999). The Governance of Directors’ Pay: Evidence from UK Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 3, 117–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brick et al., (2006), CEO Compensation, Director Compensation and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (3), 403–423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brickley J. A., Horn R. L. & Wedig G. J. (2010). Board composition and nonprofit conduct: Evidence from hospitals. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 196–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Charity Navigator. (n.d). Retrived on August 2016 from www.charitynavigator.org [Google Scholar]
  12. Davila, A., & Venkatachalam, M. (2004). The Relevance of Non-financial Performance Measures for CEO Compensation: Evidence from the Airline Industry. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 443–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. De Andres-Alonso, P., Azofra-Palenzuela, V. & Romero-Merino, M.E. (2010). Beyond the disciplinary role of governance: how bards add value to Spanish foundations. British Journal of Management, Vol. 21, 100–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duc Vo & Thuy Phan. (2013). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. [Google Scholar]
  15. Elhagrasey, G. M., Harrison, J. R., & Buchholz, R. A. (1999). Power and Pay: The Politics of CEO Compensation. Journal of Management and Governance, 2, 309–332. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fiador, V.O. (2013). Determinants of financial governance practices: evidence from NGOs in Ghana. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 33 No. ½. 114-130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghosh, C. & Sirmans, C.F. (2005). On REIT CEO compensation: Does board structure matter? The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30:4, 397–428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris, E. C. Petrovits, M.H. Yetman. (2013). The effect of nonprofit governance on donations: Evidence from the revised Form 990. Working Paper, Rutgers University Camden. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hearn, B (2013), The Impact of Board Governance On Director Compensation In West African IPO Firms, Research in International Business and Finance, Volume 28, May 2013, Pages 82–104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kyereboah, C.A. & Biekpe, N. (2007). Corporate governance and financing choices of firms: a panel data analysis. South African Journal of Economics, Vol.74(4), 670–681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Loderer, C.F. & Waelchli, U. (2011). Firm age and governance. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marchetti, P., & Stefanelli, V. (2009). Does the compensation level of outside director depend on its personal profile? Some evidence from UK. Journal of Management and Governance, 13, 325–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mayston, D. (1993). Principals, Agents and the Economics of Accountability in the New Public Sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6 (3), 68–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Newman, W. L. (2003), Social Research Method: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, fifth edition, Allyn and Bacon Publication. [Google Scholar]
  26. Peni, E. (2014). CEO compensation and Chairperson caracteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 18 (1), 185–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roberts, A.A. & Zamora, V. (2014). Top corporate officers as board members: The impact on nonprofit executive compensation. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rose, C. (2006). Board composition and corporate governance – A multivariate analysis of listed Danish firms. Eur J Law Eco, 21,113-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Roshayani Arshad, Noorbijan Abu Bakar & Normah Omar. (2013). Board composition and accountability of non-profit organizations. The Journal of Applied Business Reserch. Vol. 29 (4), 1021–1030. [Google Scholar]
  30. Statistik Pertubuhan dan Laporan. (n.d.). Retrieved December 07, 2010, from Laman Web Rasmi Jabatan Pendaftaran dan Pertubuhan Malaysia: http://www.ros.gov.my/report.php. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yetman, M.H. and R.J. Yetman. (2012). The effects of governance on the accuracy of charitable expenses reported by nonprofit organizations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 738–767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.