Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018
6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Article Number 03009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Welfare
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184003009
Published online 31 January 2018
  1. Perepjolkina V., Voita D. Latvijas Autovadītāju uzvedības aptauja.; Tehniskā atskaite. Nepublicēts. 2011.
  2. Фантяловя Е.Б. ДиягностїЄаипсїхётеряпїявнуьјеннегоконфликта. СамяјаБАХРАХ-М.2001.
  3. Jirgena, S. Jauniešu pašizjūta un adiktīvas uzvedības izvēle. Promocijas darbs. Rīga: LU. 1999.
  4. World health organisation. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. 2013.
  5. Ceļu Satiksmes Drošības Direkcija. 2004. - 2014. gados notikušo Ceļu satiksmes negadījumu, tajos bojā gājušo un ievainoto skaits. 2015.
  6. Lazdiņš K.J., Mārtinsone K. Autovadītāju agresijas un braukšanas uzvedības saistība ar personīgās automašīnas jaudu un virsbūves tipu. Nepublicēts bakalaura darbs. 2014.
  7. Dewar, R. E., & Olson, P. L. Human factors in traffic safety.; Tuscon, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Pub. 2002.
  8. Muzikante I., ReņĢe V. Autovadītāju individuālo vērtību saistība ar riskantu braukšanu.; LU raksti 768. 39-50. 2008
  9. Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press. 1973.
  10. Muzikante I. Vērtības, attieksmes un autovadītāju uzvedība uz ceļa. Promocijas darbs. 2011.
  11. Krahe B., & Fenske I. Predicting aggressive driving behavior: the role of Macho personality, age, and power of car. Aggressive Behavior 28, 21–29. 2002. [CrossRef]
  12. Özkan T., & Lajunen T. Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship between sex and gender-role on aggressive driving. traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers.; Aggressive Behavior 31, 547–558. 2005. [CrossRef]
  13. Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. Age and gender differences in risky driving: The role of positive affect and risk perception.; Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2010.
  14. Stradling, S. G., & Parker, D. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: The role of personal norm, instrumental beliefs and affective beliefs in predicting driving violations. 1997.
  15. Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Wright, S., & Crundall, D. Estimating accident liability. 1997.
  16. Tasca L. A review of literature on aggressive driving research. Aggressive Driving Issues Conference. 1-11. 2000.
  17. Lancaster R., Ward R. The contribution of individual factors to driving behaviour: Implications for managing work-related road safety.; Research Report. HSE Contract Research Report: HSE Books, 3-60. 2002.
  18. Deffenbacher, J. L., Petrilli, R. T., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Swaim, R. C. The Driver’s Angry Thoughts Questionnaire: A measure of angry cognitions when driving. Cognitive Therapy and Research 27, 383–402. 2003. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.