Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10009
Number of page(s) 16
Section Psycholinguistique et acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184610009
Published online 09 July 2018
  1. Anderson, J. R. (2009). Cognitive psychology and its implication. New York: Worth. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnon, I. (2009). Starting big - the role of multi-word phrases in language learning and use. (Doctor of Philosophy), Stanford University. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashby, W. (1988). The syntax, pragmatics and sociolinguistics of left-and right-dislocations in French. Lingua, 75, 203-229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological science, 19(3), 241-248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes, B. K. (1985). Left Detachment in Spoken Standard French (Vol. VI:3). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrett, M. (1982). The holophrastic hypothesis: conceptual and empirical issues. Cognition, 11, 47-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blasco, M. (1997). Pour une approche syntaxique des dislocations. French Language Studies, 7, 1-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Norman and Deficient Child Language. Baltimore: University Park Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Braine, M. (1976). Children’s first word combinations (Vol. 41). Chicago: Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711-733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500-508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Childers, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Development psychology, 37, 730-748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Danell, K. J. (1995). Le phénomène de concurrence en français moderne : réflexions à partir de anannée, jour-journée, paraître-apparaître, et d’autres. Uppsala: Swedish Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. De Cat, C. (2000). Structure Building and the Acquisition of Dislocations in Child French. Paper presented at the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston. [Google Scholar]
  15. De Cat, C. (2002). French Dislocation. (Doctor of Philosophy), University of York. [Google Scholar]
  16. Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 99-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Language usage, acquisition, and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  19. Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferdinand, A. (1993). Subject dislocations in French child language. HIL Manuscripts. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferdinand, A. (1996). The development of functional categories - the acquisition of the subject in French (Vol. 23). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalisations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289-316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2005). Role of prediction in construction learning. Journal of Child Language, 32, 407-426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gonzalez Rey, I. (2002). La phraséologie du français. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gross, G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français; noms composés et autres locutions. Paris: Éditions Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 229-254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Labelle, M., & Valois, D. (1996). The status of post-verbal subjects in French child language. Probus, 8(1), 53-80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lambrecht, K. (1981). Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French (H. a. V. Perret, Jef Ed. Vol. II:6.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187-220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Dresner Barnes, H. (1992). Individual differences in early vocabulary development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 287-310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 581-611). London: Elsevier Inc. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. McClure, K., & Pine, J. M. (2002). Examining the verb island hypothesis. Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress for the Study of Child Language and the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ninio, A. (1988). On formal grammatical categories in early child language In Y. Levy, I. M. Schlesinger, & M. D. S. Braine (Eds.), Categories and processes in language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  34. Parisse, C. (2008). Left-dislocated subjects: A construction typical of young French-speaking children? In J. Benjamins (Ed.), First Language Acquisition of Morphology and Syntax: Perspectives across Languages and Learners (pp. pp.13-30). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pawley, A., & Sydney, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. J. C. Richards & R. R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-225). London: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  36. Perez-Bettan, A. (2015). Apprentissage et utilisation du langage préfabriqué chez des apprenants de français langue étrangère. (PhD), University of Paris 8, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development (Vol. 7). Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Processing relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 1-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2002). Priming transitive constructions with 3-year-olds, 4-year-olds and 6-to 7-year-olds. Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress for the Study of Child Language and the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Svensson, M. H. (2004). Critères de figement, l’identification des expressions figées en français contemporain. (PhD), Umeå Universitet [Google Scholar]
  42. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1), 61-82. doi:0936-5907/00/0011-0061 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language, A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition (H. U. Press Ed.): Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomasello, M., & Brooks, P. (1998). Young children’s earliest transitive and intransitive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 379-395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Valian, V. (1986). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. Development psychology, 22, 562-579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.