EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 48 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 48 (2018) 01066 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 48, 2018
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2018 (ERPA 2018)
Article Number 01066
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184801066
Published online 15 August 2018
  1. International Association for the Study of Pain. IASP Taxonomy 2014 Available from: http://www.iasp-pain.org. [2016]. [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Merksey, N. Bogduk.. Classification of chronic pain (2nd ed.) [Seattle: IASP Press 1994]. [Google Scholar]
  3. P.S. Wall, R Melzack. Textbook of Pain (5th edn ed.) [London:Elsevier 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  4. D.A Walsh, J.C Radcliffe. Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Pain, 97, 23-31 [2002]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A.J. Baird, R.A. Haslam. Exploring differences in pain beliefs within and between a large nonclinical (workplace) population and a clinical (chronic low back pain) population using the pain beliefs questionnaire. Phys. Ther, 12, 1615-1624 [2013]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Baird, D. Sheffield. The Relationship between Pain Beliefs and Physical and Mental Health Outcome Measures in Chronic Low Back Pain: Direct and Indirect Effects Healthcare, 4, 58 [2016]. [Google Scholar]
  7. D.P Schwartz, DE DeGood, MS Shutty. Direct assessment of beliefs and attitudes of chronic pain patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 66: 806-809 [1985].. [Google Scholar]
  8. M.J. Simmonds, S. Kumar, E. Lechelt. Psychological factors in disabling low back pain: causes or consequences? Disabil Rehabil, 18:161-168 [1996]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L.C. Edwards, S.A. Pearce, L. Turner-Stokes, A. Jones. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: an investigation of beliefs in the causes and consequences of pain. Pain, 51: 267-272 [1992]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D.A. Williams, M.E. Robinson, M.E. Geisser. Pain beliefs: assessment and utility. Pain, 59:71-78 [1994]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Arnstein, M. Caudill, C.L. Mandle, A. Norris, R. Beasley. Self efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between pain intensity, disability and depression in chronic pain patients. Pain, 80:483-491 [1999]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J.A. Turner, M.P. Jensen, J.M. Romano. Do beliefs, coping, and catastrophizing independently predict functioning in patients with chronic pain? Pain, 85:115-125 [2000]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S.J. Linton, J. Vlaeyen, R. Ostelo. The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant? J Occup Rehabil, 12:223-232 [2002]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J.E. Jeffrey, N.E. Foster. A qualitative investigation of physical therapists’ experiences and feelings of managing patients with nonspecific low back pain. Phys Ther, 92:266-278 [2012]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G.L. Moseley. Reconceptualising pain acording to modern pain sciences. Physical Therapy Reviews, 12: 169-178 [2007]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Haldeman. Presidential address, North American Spine Society: Failure of the pathology model to predict back pain. Spine, 15: 718-724 [1990]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Kjaer, C. Leboeuf-Yde, L. Korsholm, J.S. Sorensen, T. Bendix. Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: A diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine, 30: 1173-1180 [2005]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A.M. Øien, S. Steihaug, S. Iversen, M. Råheim Communication as negotiation processes in long-term physiotherapy: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci, 25: 53-61 [2011]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Sloan, R. Gupta, W. Zhang, D, Walsh. Beliefs about the causes and consequences of pain in patients with chronic inflammatory or non-inflammatory low back pain and in pain-free individuals. Spine, 33, 966-972 [2008]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ö. Sertel-Berk Kronik aǧrı yaşantısı ve aǧrı inançları: Aǧrı İnançları Ölçeǧi’ nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. (Doktora tezi). [İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul 2006]. [Google Scholar]
  21. A.Ö. Birge, M. Mollaoǧlu, Pain beliefs of patients and the nonpharmacological methods they use to manage the pain. Agri, 30(2):84-92 [2018]. [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Babadaǧ, G.B. Alparslan. Hemşirelik Öǧrencilerinin Aǧrı İnançları. Sted, 26(6):244-250 [2017]. [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Van Wilgen, A. Beetsma, H. Neels, N. Roussel, J. Nijs. Physical therapists should integrate illness perceptions in their assessment in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain; a qualitative analysis. Man Ther, 19:229-34 [2014]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R.W. Ostelo, S.G. Stomp-van den Berg, J.W. Vlaeyen, et al. Health care provider’ attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain: the development of a questionnaire. Man Ther, 8: 214-22 [2003]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Latimer, C. Maher and K. Refshauge. The attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapy students to chronic back pain. Clin J Pain, 20: 45-50 [2004]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Jones, J. Ravey and W. Steedman. Developing a measure of beliefs and attitudes about chronic non-malignant pain: A pilot study of occupational therapists. Occup Ther Int, 7: 232-45 [2000]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Overmeer, K. Boersma, C.J. Main, S.J. Linton. Do physical therapists change their beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills and behaviour after a biopsychosocial orientated university course? J Eval Clin Pract, 15: 724-32 [2009]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. D.L. Rochman, M.J. Sheehan and R.J. Kulich. Evaluation of a pain curriculum for occupational therapists: experiences from a master’s-level graduate program over six years. Disabil Rehabil, 35: 1933-40 [2013]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.