Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 50, 2018
The International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences” (CILDIAH-2018)
Article Number 01138
Number of page(s) 4
Published online 12 October 2018
  1. C Abbott. E-inclusion: Learning Difficulties and Digital Technologies (Bristol: Futurelab Education, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  2. J.T Martins, M.B. Nunes, Learn. Organiz 23 (5), 299–331 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Gaebel, V. Kupriyanova, R. Morais, E. Colucci, E-learning in European Higher Education Institutions. (Brussels, EUA, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Mozhaeva. SHS Web of Conferences 26, 01018 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. M.A. McPherson, J.M. Nunes, J. Comput. Assist. Lear 24 (5), 433-455. (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Hardaker, G. Singh, Campus-Wide Information Systems 28(4), 221-233. (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Parchoma, Adoption of Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: Influences of Institutional Policies and Practices Saarbrücken, Verlag, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  8. V.P. Babintsev, V.A. Sapryka, Y.I. Serkina, G.F. Ushamirskaya. Eur. J. of Contemp. Educ 17 (3), 284–294 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. E.A. McGibbon, Oppression: A Social Determinant of Health. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publ., (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Kornai, Voprosy Ekonomiki 4. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Ugnich, A. Chernokozov, E. Filinkova, Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, 97 (CILDIAH, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. V.L. Zakovorotny, M.B. Flek, E.A. Ugnich, Intern. J. Econ. Perspect 10(4). (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. E.G. Popkova, V.I. Tinyakova, World Appl. Sci. J. 24(4), 467-475. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. С. Freeman, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lesson from Japan. (Pinter Publ., 1987) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Laanpere. Tools and methods for Internet Usage in Estonia’s system of general education. (Baltic IT review, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Laanpere, E. Matsak, J. Kippar. Integrating a concept mapping tool into a virtual learning environment: pedagogical and tehcnological challenges. In: Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of CMC2006 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. Ch. B. Jones. J. Futures Stud. 10(4), 6-8. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  18. T. M. Crea, N. Sparnon. Democratizing education at the margins: faculty and practitioner perspectives on delivering online tertiary education for refugees. Intern. J. Educ. Tech. High. Educ. 14(43) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Rosenson. Fundamentals of design theory (Saint-Petersburg, Peter, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.T. Martins, M.B. Nunes, Intern. J. Educ. Man. 30(1), 2-19. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  21. R. J. Beck. “What Are Learning Objects?” Learning Objects. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.