Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 50, 2018
The International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences” (CILDIAH-2018)
Article Number 01240
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001240
Published online 12 October 2018
  1. E.P. Ishchenko, Progress in science and technology as a determining factor in improving forensic equipment. Issues of development of forensics in the conditions of scientific and technological progress, (Sverdlovsk, 1982) [Google Scholar]
  2. V.G. Kolomatskii, Background information of forensic support of criminal investigations. Information bulleting of the material of readings in forensics “Forensic support of fight against crime”,. 13, 19–24 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  3. R.S. Belkin, Forensic support of the activities of criminal police and preliminary investigation bodies ( Moscow: Novyi Iurist, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  4. A.R. Rationov, Issues of cognition in court evidencing, Soviet state and law, 8 (1964) [Google Scholar]
  5. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Tajikistan of 3 December 2009 No. 564 (ed. of 24 February 2017) Retrieved from: http://www.innovbusiness.ru/pravo/DocumShow_DocumID_36351.html. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.N. Gushchin, Initial operations and investigations: perfecting the forms of including its results in the criminal proceedings, (Moscow, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  7. Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR with materials pertaining to various articles 1960 (as amended on 24 January 1985). (Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  8. L.A. Voskobitova, Relations between the notions of “substantial breach of law of criminal procedure” and “admissibility of evidence”, (Rostov-on-Don, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  9. K.F. Gutsenko, Criminal procedure in the Western countries, (Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  10. A.S. Urgalkin, Admissibility of results of initial operations and investigations as evidence, Legislation and law, 8 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  11. V.A. Lazareva, Issues of evidencing in the modern court proceedings, (Samara, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. V.A. Volynskii, Forensic technology. Science. Technology. Society. Human: a monography, (Moscow: UNITI. Legislation and law, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  13. P.P. Ishchenko, Specialist in criminal activities (aspects of criminal procedure and forensics), (Moscow, 1990) [Google Scholar]
  14. N.M. Samiev, Investigation of unsolved cases of the past years (study of materials from the Republic of Tajikistan and the Russian Federeation): Dissertation of PhD in Law, (Moscow, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. A.L. Aripov, Investigator’s activities to collect and validate evidence during preliminary investigation (study of law of the Republic of Tajikistan) Dissertation of PhD in Law, (Moscow, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. G.V. Paramonova, I.N. Pervushina, About certain aspects of the tactics of involvement of forensic experts in crime scene investigation, Scholarly notes of the Faculty of Law,17 (27), 74–77 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  17. Argumented facts, 20 2, 6 (January 2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. B.M. Bishmanov, About the content of forensic support, Izvestiya Tula State University, Modern issues of Russian legislation, legal sciences, and law enforcement, 9, 42–44 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.F. Volynskii, Forensic service of the MIA of Russia: the past, present, and future, Bulletin of the MIA of Russia, 3 (104), 76–83 (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.