EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 53 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 53 (2018) 04005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 53, 2018
International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences (ICHSS 2018)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 12
Section Religions, Science and Morality
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185304005
Published online 16 October 2018
  1. Al-Khalifa, H. S. (2010). A first step in evaluating the usability of Jusur learning management system. In 3rd Annual Forum on e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East. [Google Scholar]
  2. Albert, W., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Interactive Technologies Series (2nd ed.). Elsevier Inc. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13(1), 217–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2017). Why People Use Chatbots Petter. Insci 2017, 9934(November), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Calvo, R., Arbiol, A., & Iglesias, A. (2014). Are all chats suitable for learning purposes? A study of the required characteristics. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 251–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, C.-K., & Hsu, C.-K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation–annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 155–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, B., & Denoyelles, A. (2013). Exploring students’ mobile learning practices in higher education. Educause Review, 7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, C. M., & Hsu, S. H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective english learning. Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2006.385081 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies. Going to the mall: mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  12. Church, K., & De Oliveira, R. (2013). What’s up with whatsapp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 352–361). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cummins, J. (2003). Reading and the bilingual student: Fact and friction. In English Learners: Reaching the Highest Level of English Literacy (pp. 2–33). International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cuno Klopfenstein, L., & Bogliolo, A. (2017). the Quiz Master Bot : a Persistent Augmented Quiz Delivered Through Online Messaging. 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, (March). https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.2328 [Google Scholar]
  15. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2016). ICT Use and Access By Individuals and Households Survey Report. [Google Scholar]
  16. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage publications. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fryer, L., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language Learning Tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ganapathy, M., Shuib, M., & Azizan, S. N. (2016). Malaysian ESL students’ perceptions on the usability of a mobile application for grammar test: A case study of ESL undergraduates in universiti sains Malaysia. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2201-10 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 21–30). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Using Mobile on EFL Learners’ Reading Practices in Najran University. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 8. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, L., & Lin, C. (2011). EFL learners’ reading on mobile phones. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 61–78. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeon, E.-Y., & Day, R. R. (2016). The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/SOI42716411000932 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, H., Lee, M., & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of South Korea. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 31. [Google Scholar]
  24. Klopfenstein, L. C., Delpriori, S., Malatini, S., & Bogliolo, A. (2017). The Rise of Bots. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems DIS ’17 (pp. 555–565). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064672 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Krashen, S. D. (2004). The case for narrow reading. Language Magazine, 3(5), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00054-N [Google Scholar]
  26. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: what have we learnt? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, H., & Mallinder, M. (2017). Role of Extensive Reading in EFL Vocabulary Development : Review and Recommendation. The English Teacher, XL, 145–163. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lella, A., & Lipsman, A. (2014). The US mobile app report. Tech. Rep. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin, H.-C. K., Hsieh, M.-C., Wang, C.-H., Sie, Z.-Y., & Chang, S.-H. (2011). Establishment and Usability Evaluation of an Interactive AR Learning System on Conservation of Fish. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 181–187. [Google Scholar]
  32. Marçal, E., Andrade, R., Melo, R., Viana, W., & Junqueira, E. (2016). Using mobile message to improve student participation in blended courses: a Brazilian case study. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review, 16(3), 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  33. McKitterick, W. (2015). The messaging app report: How instant messaging can be monetized. Technical report, BusinessInsider. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mobile Ecosystem Forum. (2016). Global Insights into Chat Apps and SMS Usage. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mostakhdemin-Hosseini, A. (2009). Usability considerations of mobile learning applications. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 3, 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nezarat, A., & Mosavi Miangah, T. (2012). Mobile-Assister language. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS), 1(1), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nieminen, M. P., Runonen, M., Tyllinen, M., & Nieminen, M. (2014). Collaboration space for creative knowledge work–Analysis of industrial pilots. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 653–662). Springer. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nordin, N. M., Embi, M. A., Norman, H., & Panah, E. (2017). A Historical Review of Mobile Learning Research in Malaysia and Its Implications for Malaysia and the Asia-Pacific Region BT Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Harnessing Trends and Challenging Orthodoxies. In A. Murphy, H. Farley, L. E. Dyson, & H. Jones (Eds.) (pp. 137–150). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Orfanou, K., Tselios, N., & Katsanos, C. (2015). Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual, 3rd. Allen & Unwin. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sauro, J. (2011a). A practical guide to the System Usability Scale (SUS): Background. Measuring Usability LLC. Denver, Colorado. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sauro, J. (2011b). Measuring Usability With The System Usability Scale (SUS). Measuring Usability, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  43. Suominen, M. (2013). Evaluating usability in video conferencing service in Metso (unpublished master’s thesis). JAMK University of Applied Science. Finland. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tanja, R. (2011). A usability evaluation of a personal video recorder: Navigation and channel list management from a user perspective. Bachelor thesis of Cognitive Science. Linköping University, Sweden. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.