Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2018
International Conference on Leadership and Management (ICLM 2018)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Millennial HR Management
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. Armsden, G. C., &Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. (1989). Attachment beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709-716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics (1999). Media education. Pediatrics, 104, 341-343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics, (2011). Council on Communications and Media. Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics, 128, 1040-1045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beard K. W., Wolf E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 377-383. doi:10.1089/109493101300210286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting styles on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56e96. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (1st ed., Vol. I). New York, NY: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  8. Beniot, D., 2004. Infant-parental attachment: definition, types, antecedents, measurement and outcome. Paediatr. Child Health 9 (8), 541-545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bowlby, John., 1982. Attachment and loss, Vol. 1, Attachment, 2nd ed., Basic Books, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bleumers, L.,Mouws, K.,Huyghe, J., van Mechelen, M., Mariën, I., &Zaman, B. (2015). Sensitivity to parental play beliefs and mediation in young children’s hybrid play activities. Proceedings of IDC. Boston, MA: ACM Press, pp. 170– 177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan, k., &Chan, S. (2005). Perceived parenting styles and goal orientations: a study of teacher education students in Hong Kong. Research in Education, 74, 9-21. (EJ751077). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chou, C., &Peng, H. (2007). Net-friends: adolescents attitudes and experiences vs. teachers concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2394e2413. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cho, C. H., &Choi, H. J. (2005). Children’s exposure to negative Internet content: Effects of family context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(4), 488-509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Childwise. (2012). The monitor pre-school report 2012: key behavior patterns among 0 to 4 year olds, Norwich. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, X.,Dong, Q., &Zhou, H. (1997). Authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices and social and school performance in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 855-873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitivebehavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187– 195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. DeBell, M., andChapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet use by Children and Adolescents in the United States, 2001 (NCES 2004-014). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. [Google Scholar]
  18. Donoso, V.,Verdoodt, V., van Mechelen, M., &Jasmontaite, L. (2016). Faraway, so close: Why the digital industry needs scholars and the other way around. Journal of Children and Media (in press). [Google Scholar]
  19. Eastin, M.,Greenberg, B., &Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication, 56, 486e504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fleming, J.,Greentree, S., Cocotti-Muller, D., Elias, K., &Morrison, S. (2006). Safety in Cyberspace. Youth and Society, 38(2), 135e154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Findahl, O. (2012). Swedes and the Internet 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodman, A. &Gregg, P. (2010). Poorer children’s educational attainment: How important are attitudes and behaviour?. Joseph Rowntree Foundation Report. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  23. Guan S. A. & Subrahmanyam (2009) Youth Internet Use: Risks and Opportunities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 22(4): 351-356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grolnick, W. S., &Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regnlation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heim, J.,Brandtzaeg, P.,Hertzberg, B., &Endstad, T. (2007). Children’s usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors. New Media & Society, 9(3), 425e454 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Harakeh, Z.,Scholte, R. H.,Vermulst, A. A., De Vries, H., &Engels, R. C. M. E. (2004). Parental factors and adolescents’ smoking behavior: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Preventive Medicine, 39(5), 951-961. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. HM Government (2014) An Evidence Review of the Drivers of Child Poverty for Families in Poverty Now and for Poor Children Growing up to be Poor Adults. Cm8781. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ishak, Z.,Low, S. F., &Lau, P. L. (2012). Parenting style as a moderator for students’ academic achievement. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 21, 487-493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A.,Wright, S. L., &Hudiburgh, L. (2012). The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33, 294-301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kang, Y. &Moore, J. (2011). ‘Parenting style and adolescents’ school performance inmainland China’. US– China Education Review, B (1), 133-138. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kerr, M. andStattin, H. (2003) ‘Parenting of adolescents: Action or Reaction?’ In: A.C. Crouter and A. Booth (Eds.), Children’s Influence on Family Dynamics: The Neglected Side of Family Relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 121-52. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kerbs, R. (2005). Social and ethical considerations in virtual worlds. Retrieved on November 8, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuss, D. J.,Griffiths, M. D.,Karila, L., &Billieux, J. (2014). Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20, 4026-4052. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kalil, A.,Ryan, R., &Corey, M. (2012). Diverging Destinies: Maternal Education and the Developmental Gradient in Time with Children. Demography, 49(4), 1361-1383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Livingstone, S., &Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: Surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. Retrieved on March 19, 2009 from. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lwin, M. O.,Stanaland, A., &Miyazaki, A. (2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: how parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84, 205e217 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, S., &Chae, M. A. (2007). Children‘s Internet use in a family context: influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640e644. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lei, L., &Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and Internet use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(5) [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu Q-X,Fang X-Y,Zhou Z-K,Zhang J-T,Deng L-Y (2013) Perceived Parent-Adolescent Relationship, Perceived Parental Online Behaviors and Pathological Internet Use among Adolescents: Gender-Specific Differences. PLoS ONE 8(9): e75642. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075642. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, C. Y., & Kuo, F.Y.(2007). A study of Internet addiction through the lens of the interpersonal theory. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 799-804. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Maccoby, E.E. andMartin, J.A. (1983) ‘Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction’. In: P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.) and E.M. Hetherington (Volume Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Volume 4: Socialization, personality and social development (4th edition). New York: Wiley, pp. 1-101. [Google Scholar]
  42. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (2016). Internet Users Survey 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. McGencey, S. (2011). The time is now: creating opportunities for young children to succeed. National Civic Review 100(4), 56-58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. McKinney, C.,Milone, M. C., &Renk, K. (2011). Parenting and late adolescent emotional adjustment: Mediating effects of discipline and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 42, 463-481. doi: 10.1007/s10578011-0229-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nouwen, M., Van Mechelen, M. and Zaman, B., 2015. A value sensitive design approach to parental software for young children, Proc. IDC 2015. 363-366. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pew Internet & American Life Project (PI & ALP). (2005b). Teens and technology. Washington D. C,: Pew Internet & American Life Project. [Google Scholar]
  47. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pearson, J. C. &Child, J. T. (2007). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Parental and Peer Attachment Styles among Adult Children from the United States, Puerto Rico, and India. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 36(1): 15-32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rideout, V.J.,Foehr, U.G., &Roberts, D.F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8to 18-year olds. (Kaiser Report 2010). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  50. Ramayah, T., &Jantan, M. (2004). Internet usage among Malaysian students: The role of demographic and motivational variables. The Journal of Management Awareness, 7(2), 5970. [Google Scholar]
  51. Roberts, L.D., Smith, L.M. &Pollak, C.(2005). A model of social interaction via computer mediated communication in real textbased virtual environments, [Google Scholar]
  52. Ribeiro, M. (2007). Children and divorce. Lisbon: Editorial Presence. [Google Scholar]
  53. Relvas, A., &Vaz, C. (2007). Single parenthood: A family a part or part of the family. In A. Relvas, & M. Alarcão (Eds.), New forms of family (pp. 253-269). Coimbra: Quartet. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sarina Yusuf, Mohd. Nizam OsmanaMd., Salleh Hj. Hassana & Misha Teimoury Misha (2014) Parents’ influence on children’s online usage. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155. pp. 81-86. ISSN 1877-0428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Soh, C. H. (2010) Influence of Parents and Peers On Internet Usage and Addiction Amongst School-Going Youths in Malaysia. Malaysian University of Science and Technology, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  56. Soh, P.C.H.,Charlton, J., Chew, K.W., 2014. The influence of parental and peer attachment on internet usage motives and addiction. First Monday 19 (7). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Teuwen, J., De Groff, D., &Zaman, B. (2012). Flemish preschoolers online: a mixed-method approach to explore online use, preferences and the role of parents and siblings. Paper presented at the Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap, Leuven, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  58. Valcke, M.,Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., &Gerarts, M. (2007). Primary school children’s safe and unsafe use of Internet at home and at school: an exploratory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2838e2850 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Valcke, M.,Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., &Gerarts, M. Primary school children’s safe and unsafe use of Internet at home and at school: a follow-up study, submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]
  60. Valcke M,Bonte S,De Wever B,Rots I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Comput Educ 2010; 55: 454-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Van der Vorst, H.,Engels, R. C. M. E.,Meeus, W.,Dekovic, M., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2005). The role of alcohol-specific socialization in adolescents’ drinking behaviour. Addiction, 100(10), 1464– 1476 [Google Scholar]
  62. Widyanto, L.,Griffiths, M., 2006. Internet addiction; does it really exist? (revisited). In: Gackenbach, J. (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wellman, B., &Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167-194). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yahaya Ibrahim (1995). Urbanization and Neighborhood. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka: Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar]
  65. Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction; the emergence of new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 237-244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yen, J. Y.,Yen, C. F., Chen, C.C., Chen, S. H., &Ko, C. H. (2007). Family factors of Internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 323-329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zickhur, K. &Smith, A. (2013). “Home Broadband 2013” Internet & American Life Project. Washington D. C. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zeinali A,Sharifi H,Enayati M,Asgari P,Pasha GH, 2011. Development and validation of parenting styles questionnaire. Journal of New Thoughts of Educational Sciences. 6(3): 129-145. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ismail, Ikram. (2011, October 12). Cyberduped parents, The Malay Mail, p.7. 1 [Google Scholar]
  70. Goldberg I (1995). Internet Addictive Disorder (IAD) diagnostic criteria. [Google Scholar]
  71. Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4,1-103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Greening, L.,Stoppelbein, L., &Luebbe, A. (2010). The moderating effects of parenting styles on African American and Caucasian children’s suicidal behaviors. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 39, 357-369. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9459-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Trinkner, R.,Cohn, E. S.,Rebellon, C. J., & Van Gundy, K. (2012). Don’t trust anyone over 30: Parental legitimacy as a mediator between parenting style and changes in delinquent behavior over time. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 119-132. doi: 10.1016 /j.adolescence.2011.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Jutengren, G., &Palmerus, K. (2006). The potential role of conflict resolution schemas in adolescent psychosocial adjustment. Social Indicators Research, 83,25-38.doi:10.1007/s11205-0069066-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.