Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2018
International Conference on Leadership and Management (ICLM 2018)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 13
Section Agile Leadership & Millennial HR Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185603005
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. Agrawal, V. (2012). Managing the diversified team: challenges and strategies for improving performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18(7/8), 384-400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. New York. [Google Scholar]
  3. Backes-Gellner, U., &Veen, S. (2009). The impact of aging and age diversity on company performance. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnett, W. P., &Hansen, M. T. (1996). The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 139-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergh, D. D. (2001). Diversification strategy research at a crossroads. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management, 355-376. [Google Scholar]
  6. Berman, E. M.,West, J. P., & Richter Jr, M. N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowers, C. A.,Pharmer, J. A., &Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small group research, 31(3), 305-327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bunderson, J. S., &Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875-893. [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 11): Academic Pr. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campion, M. A.,Medsker, G. J., &Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology, 46(4), 823-847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, M.-J., &MacMillan, I. C. (1992). Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 539-570. [Google Scholar]
  12. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahlin, K. B.,Weingart, L. R., &Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1107-1123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Delgado‐García, J. B., La Fuente‐Sabaté, D., &Manuel, J. (2010). How do CEO emotions matter? Impact of CEO affective traits on strategic and performance conformity in the Spanish banking industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 562-574. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization science, 3(2), 179-202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Hoch, J. (2014). Shared leadership, diversity, and information sharing in teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 541-564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Randel, A., & Jaussi, K. S. (2003). Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 763-774. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M., &Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 1105-1121. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ensley, M. D.,Pearce, C. L., &Hmieleski, K. M. (2006). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 243-263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Finkelstein, S., &Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 484-503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gebert, D.,Boerner, S., &Kearney, E. (2006). Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 431-458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerber, M.,Hartmann, T.,Brand, S., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., & Pühse, U. (2010). The relationship between shift work, perceived stress, sleep and health in Swiss police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1167-1175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbert, J. A.,Stead, B. A., &Ivancevich, J. M. (1999). Diversity management: A new organizational paradigm. Journal of business ethics, 21(1), 61-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Goll, I.,Sambharya, R. B., &Tucci, L. A. (2001). Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance. MIR: Management International Review, 109-129. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gunz, H. P., &Jalland, R. M. (1996). Managerial careers and business strategies. Academy of management review, 21(3), 718-756. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Haas, H. (2010). How can we explain mixed effects of diversity on team performance? A review with emphasis on context. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(5), 458-490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of management review, 32(2), 334-343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hambrick, D. C.,Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative science quarterly, 659-684. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hambrick, D. C., &Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in organizational behavior. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hambrick, D. C.,Finkelstein, S., &Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of management review, 30(3), 472-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hambrick, D. C., &Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hambrick, D. C., &Quigley, T. J. (2014). Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 473-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harrison, D. A., &Humphrey, S. E. (2010). Designing for diversity or diversity for design? Tasks, interdependence, and within‐unit differences at work. Journal of organizational behavior, 31(2‐3), 328-337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Herrmann, P., &Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jehn, K. A.,Northcraft, G. B., &Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kilduff, M.,Angelmar, R., &Mehra, A. (2000). Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization science, 11(1), 21-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kraatz, M. S., &Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization science, 12(5), 632-657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Krishnan, H. A.,Miller, A., &Judge, W. Q. (1997). Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management Journal, 361-374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lamberg, J. A.,Tikkanen, H.,Nokelainen, T., & Suur‐Inkeroinen, H. (2009). Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survival. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 45-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Leonard, J. S.,Levine, D. I., &Joshi, A. (2004). Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees’ similarity with one another and with customers. Journal of organizational behavior, 25(6), 731-754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, C.-R. (2013). How top management team diversity fosters organizational ambidexterity: The role of social capital among top executives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(5), 874-896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lin, C.-S.,Chang, R.-Y., &Dang, V. T. (2015). An integrated model to explain how corporate social responsibility affects corporate financial performance. Sustainability, 7(7), 8292-8311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lockwood, N. (2005). Workplace diversity: Leveraging the power of difference for competitive advantage: Society for Human Resource Management. [Google Scholar]
  45. March, J. G., &Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mello, A. S., &Ruckes, M. E. (2006). Team composition. The Journal of Business, 79(3), 1019-1039. [Google Scholar]
  47. Meyer, M. W. (1993). Organizational Design. Explorations in economic sociology, 249. [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, D. (1992). The generic strategy trap. Journal of business Strategy, 13(1), 37-41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mohammed, S., &Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface‐and deep‐level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of organizational behavior, 25(8), 1015-1039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Murtha, T. P.,Lenway, S. A., &Bagozzi, R. P. (1998). Global mind-sets and cognitive shift in a complex multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 97-114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nadolska, A., &Barkema, H. G. (2014). Good learners: How top management teams affect the success and frequency of acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1483-1507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nielsen, B. B., &Nielsen, S. (2013). Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 373-382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ozer, M. (2010). Top management teams and corporate political activity: Do top management teams have influence on corporate political activity? Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1196-1201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pelled, L. H.,Eisenhardt, K. M., &Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 44(1), 1-28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Polzer, J. T.,Caruso, H. M., &Brief, A. (2008). Identity negotiation processes amidst diversity. Diversity at work, 89-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York, 300, 28. [Google Scholar]
  57. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. 1985. In: New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  58. Quigley, T. J., &Hambrick, D. C. (2012). When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 834-859. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rajagopalan, N., &Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). TOWARDS A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shore, L. M., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., Jung, D. I., Randel, A. E., &Singh, G. (2009). Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? Human resource management review, 19(2), 117-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Smith, E., & Smith Jr, J. (2008). Using secondary data in educational and social research: McGraw-Hill Education (UK). [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith, W. K., &Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization science, 16(5), 522-536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Stasser, G.,Stewart, D. D., &Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of experimental social psychology, 31(3), 244-265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tajfel, H., &Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & WG Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tanikawa, T.,Kim, S., &Jung, Y. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: exploring a function of age. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 23(3/4), 156-170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tarus, D. K., &Aime, F. (2014). Board demographic diversity, firm performance and strategic change. Management Research Review, 37(12), 1110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Triandis, H. C.,Kurowski, L. L., &Gelfand, M. J. (1994). Workplace diversity. [Google Scholar]
  68. Turner, J. C.,Hogg, M. A.,Oakes, P. J.,Reicher, S. D., &Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory: Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  69. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., &Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Knippenberg, D., &Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 515-541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1998). DEMOGRAPHY AND. Research in organizational behavior, 20, 77-140. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, D.,Lowry, P. B.,Zhou, L., &Fu, X. (2007). The impact of individualism—collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 53-80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.