Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 57, 2018
The 10th Jubilee Scientific Conference – InfoGlob 2018
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Ecological Aspects of Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185702005
Published online 26 November 2018
  1. J. Juda, Pomiary zapylenia i technika odpylania (Wydawnictwo Naukowo–Techniczne, Warszawa, 1968) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Schwartz, Health effects of air pollution from traffic: ozone and particulate matter, Health at the Crossroads. Transport Policy and Urban Health, W.T. Fletcher, A. McMichael (ed.) (Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 61–82, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  3. W.C. Hinds, Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior and Measurement of Airborne Particles (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. DeCarlo, J. Slowik, D. Worsnop, P. Davidovits, J. Jimenez, Aerosol Sci. Tech. 38, 1185–1205 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Klejnowski, J. Pastuszka, W. Rogula-Kozłowska, E. Talik, A. Krasa, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 88, 255–259 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Morawska, S. Thomas, M. Jamriska, G. Johnson, Atmos. Environ. 33, 4401–4411 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Rogula-Kozłowska, Air Qual. Atmo. Health 9, 533–550 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Fromme, J. Diemer, S. Dietrich, J. Cyrys, J. Heinrich, W. Lang, D. Twardella, Atmos. Environ. 42, 6597–6605 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. J. Kelly, J.C. Fussell, Atmos. Environ. 60, 504–526 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Bełdowska, D. Saniewska, L. Falkowska, A. Lewandowska, Atmos. Environ. 46, 397–404 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Mainka, E. Zajusz-Zubek, K. Kaczmarek, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 7990–8008 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. International Agency for Research on Cancer, A review of Human Carcinogens: Arsenic. Metals. Fibres. and Dusts, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (IARC, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Bessagnet, A. Hodzic, O. Blanchard, M. Lattuati, O. Le Bihan, H. Marfaing, L. Rouıl, Atmos. Environ. 39, 6159–6174 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Rogula-Kozłowska, G. Majewski, B. Błaszczak, K. Klejnowski, P. Rogula-Kopiec, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 715 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.S. Pastuszka, W. Rogula-Kozłowska, E. Zajusz-Zubek, Environ. Monit. Assess. 168, 613 (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Abelsohn, D.M. Stieb, Can. Fam. Physician, 57,8, 881–887 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. T. de Kok, H. Driece, J. Hogervorst, J. Briedé, Mutat. Res. 613, 103–122 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Sówka, Ł. Pachurka, M. Przepiórka, W. Rogula-Kozłowska, A. Zwoździak, Rocz. Ochr. Śr., 18, 610–622 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Dockery, J. Spengler, Atmos. Environ. 15, 335–343 (1981) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Jones, C. Thornton, D. Mark, R. Harrison, Atmos. Environ. 34, 2603–2612 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Rogula-Kopiec, J. Pastuszka. W. Rogula Kozłowska. G. Majewski, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW 47, 1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Alves, A. Calvo, A. Castro, R. Fraile, M. Evtyugina, E. Bate-Epey, Int. J. Environ. Chem. Ecol. Geo. Geophysic. Eng., 7, 6 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Branis, J. Safranek, Environ. Res. 111, 4 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Hajian, S. Mohaghegh, Int. J. Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine 5, 22–31 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Ramos, H. Wolterbeek, S. Almeida, Build. Environ. 82, 349–360 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Kuskowska, W. Rogula-Kozłowska, P. Rogula-Kopiec, E3S Web of Conferences 28, 01020 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Daigle, D. Chalupa, F. Gibb, P. Morrow, G. Oberdörster, M. Utell, M. Frampton, Inhal. Toxicol. 15, 539–552 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Niinimaa, P. Cole, S. Mintz, Respir Physiol, 42, 61–71 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  29. J.S. Pastuszka, Higiena pracy w pomieszczeniach nieprzemysłowych, Higiena Pracy, J.A. Indulski (ed.) (Łódź, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Morawska, T. Salthammer, Indoor environment: airborne particles and settled dust (John Wiley & Sons, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  31. W.R. Ott, Journal Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 40, 966–975 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. K. Widziewicz, W. Rogula-Kozłowska, Atmos. Pollut. Res. 9, 399–410 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. K. Widziewicz, W. Rogula-Kozłowska, K. Loska, Atmos. Pollut. Res. 7, 5 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Federal Register, Revised requirements for designation of reference and equivalent methods for PM2.5 and ambient air quality surveillance for particulate matter, Final Rule: 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 (Federal Register 62, 38764, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  35. EC, Council directive 1999/30/EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air (Official Journal of the European Communities, L163, 41–60, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  36. CEN, Air Quality—Determination of the PM10 fraction of suspended particulate matter—Reference method and field test procedure to demonstrate reference equivalence of measurement methods (EN 12341, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  37. A.D. Eisner, R.W. Wiener, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36, 433–440 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Y. Pang, N.L. Eatough, D.J. Eatough, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36, 277–288 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Bogacki, R. Oleniacz, M. Mazur, S. Kamiński, Environ. Prot. Eng. 32, 69–74 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Gębicki, K. Szymańska, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 20, 1465–1472 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Gębicki, K. Szymańska, Atmos. Environ. 54, 18–24 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. EC, Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods (EC Working Group on Guidance for the Demonstration of Equivalence, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  43. H. Fromme, D. Twardella, S. Dietrich, D. Heitmann, R. Schierl, B. Liebl, H. Ruden, Atmos. Environ. 41, 854–866 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. I. Bos, P. De Boever, J. Vanparijs, N. Pattyn, L.I Panis, R. Meeusen, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 45, 439–47 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. L. Fang, G. Clausen, P.O. Fanger, Int. J. Indoor Environ. Health 8, 80–90 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  46. I. Rivas, M. Mazaheri, M. Viana, T. Moreno, S. Clifford, C. He, O.F. Bischof, V. Martins, C. Reche, A. Alastuey, M. Alvarez-Pedrerol, J. Sunyer, L. Morawska, X. Querol, Sci Total Environ. 584, 849–855 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Jabłońska, Skład fazowy pyłów atmosferycznych w wybranych miejscowościach Górnośląskiego Okręgu Przemysłowego (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  48. P.A. Baron, K. Willeke, Aerosol measurement: principle,. technique and applications (2nd ed, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  49. J. Durant, W.J. Busby, A. Lafleur, B. Penman, C. Crespi, Mutat Res. 371, 123–157 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  50. K.H. Kim, S.A. Jahan, E. Kabir, R.J.C. Brown, Environ. Int., 60, 71–80 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. D.S. Jyethi, P.S. Khillare,S. Sarkar, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 21, 366–378 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Reizer, Co to jest pył zawieszony?, Pyły drobne w atmosferze, K. Juda-Rezler, B. Toczko (ed.) (Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Warszawa, 11–21, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  53. W. Rogula-Kozłowska, PAH and Heavy Metals in Ambient Particulate Matter: A Review of Up-to-Date Worldwide Data, Synergic Influence of Gaseous, Particulate, and Biological Pollutants on Human Health,J.S. Pastuszka (ed.), CRC Press, 68–108 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. A. Degórska, Źródła emisji pyłu pierwotnego. Pyły drobne w atmosferze, K. Juda-Rezler, B. Toczko (ed.) (Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Warszawa, 22–26, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  55. A. Zwoździak, M. Gini, L. Samek, W. Rogula-Kozlowska, I. Sówka, J. Aerosol Sci. 103 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  56. M. Sracic, J. Aerosol Sci. 99, 54–63 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. J.C. Naranjo, J. Sports Med, 39, 80–83 (2005) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.