Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 58, 2018
GLOBMAR 2018 - Global Maritime Conference
Article Number 01029
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 03 December 2018
  1. P. Freathy, & F. O’Connell, Strategic reactions to the abolition of duty free:: Examples from the European airport sector. Euro. Man. J., 18, 638-645 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Gebauer, C.W. Nam, & R. Parsche, Lessons of the 1999 abolition of intra-EU duty free sales for the new EU member states. CESifo Econ. St., 51, 133-157 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Wergeland, Ferry passenger markets. The Blackwell Comp. to Marit. Econ., 161-183 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Graham, Liberalization, regional economic development and the geography of demand for air transport in the European Union. J. Tran. Geog., 6, 87-104 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Morrell, Air transport liberalization in Europe: the progress so far. J. A. Tran. World Wide, 3, 42-60 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Micco & T. Serebrisky, Competition regimes and air transport costs: The effects of open skies agreements. J. Int. Econ., 70, 25-51 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Fu, T. H. Oum, & A. Zhang, Air transport liberalization and its impacts on airline competition and air passenger traffic. Tran. J., 24-41 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Button, The impact of US-EU “Open Skies” agreement on airline market structures and airline networks. J. A. Tran. Man., 15, 2, 59-71 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Moszkowicz, M. Moszkowicz, Konkurencyjność i innowacje - gdzie szukać szansy?. Tożs. Str. Przed. - modele i doświadczenia. M. Moszkiewicz (ed.), 110, (House Publ. Technical Wrocław University, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  10. M.E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 70-72 (Macmillan Press Ltd, 1986). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. McFadden, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1973) [Google Scholar]
  12. W.B. Jackson & J.V. Jucker, An empirical study of travel time variability and travel choice behavior. Tran. Sc., 16, 460-475 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y.L. Ye & Y.S. Wang, Research on travel mode choice behavior in Shanghai-Hangzhou transport corridor. J. China Rail. Soc., 32, 13-17 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Hunecke, A. Blöbaum, E. Matthies & R. Höger, Responsibility and environment: Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Env. Beh., 33, 830-852 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Scheiner & C. Holz-Rau, Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?. Transportation, 34, 487-511 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Vij, A. Carrel & J.L. Walker, Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Tran. Res. Part A: Pol. Prac., 54, 164-178 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Paulssen, D. Temme, A. Vij & J.L. Walker, Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice. Tran., 41, 873-888 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. De Vos, P.L. Mokhtarian, T. Schwanen, V. Van Acker & F. Witlox, Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Tran., 43, 771-796 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. J.C. Martín, C. Román, J.C. García-Palomares & J. Gutiérrez, Spatial analysis of the competitiveness of the high-speed train and air transport: The role of access to terminals in the Madrid-Barcelona corridor. Tran. Res. Part A: Pol. Prac., 69, 392-408 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Albalate, G. Bel & X. Fageda, Competition and cooperation between high-speed rail and air transportation services in Europe. J. Tran. Geog., 42, 166-174 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. T. D’Alfonso, C. Jiang & V. Bracaglia, Would competition between air transport and high-speed rail benefit environment and social welfare?. Tran. Res. Part B: Meth., 74, 118-137 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Xia & A. Zhang, High-speed rail and air transport competition and cooperation: A vertical differentiation approach. Tran. Res. Part B: Meth., 94, 456-481 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. W. Rothengatter, High-speed rail and air travel complementarity: the case of Germany. High-Speed Rail and Sustainability, (Routledge, 123-134, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Sambracos, Air-sea transport: competitiveness or complementarity in the Greek insular market. (Inter. Con. A. Tran. A. evol. in the 21st Century, 3-4, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Rigas, Boat or airplane? Passengers’ perceptions of transport services to islands. The example of the Greek domestic leisure market. J. Tran. Geo., 17, 396-401 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Rigas, E. Sambracos, & A. Gatzoli, Air and sea transport: Competition strategies under normal and economic crisis environments. SPOUDAI-J. Econ. Bus., 61, 65-84 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Mańkowska, The concept of development of passenger ferry services in the Baltic sea region in terms of the growing interbranch competition. (17th Inter. Conf. Tran. Sc. Slovenia: Mar. Tran. Log. Sc., 2015) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Pantouvakis, Port-service quality dimensions and passenger profiles: an exploratory examination and analysis. Mar. Econ. & Log., 8, 402-418 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Malighetti, S. Paleari & R. Redondi, Connectivity of the European airport network:“self-help hubbing” and business implications. J. A. Tran. Man., 14, 53-65 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Paleari, R. Redondi, P. Malighetti, A comparative study of airport connectivity in China, Europe and US: which network provides the best service for passengers?. Tran. Res., 42, 198-210 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  31. G. Burghouwt, R. Redondi, Connectivity in Air Transport Networks. An Assessment of Models and Applications. J. Tran. Econ. Pol., 47, 1, 37-41 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Dennis, Airline hub operations in Europe. J. Tran. Geog., 2, 219-233 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Dennis, Scheduling strategies for airline hub operations. J. Tran. Man., 1, 131-144 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  34. N. Dennis, R. Doganis, Lessons in Hubbing, A. Bus., 3, 42-47 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Veldhuis, The competitive position of airline networks. J. A. Tran. Man., 3, 181-188 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Burghouwt, J. Veldhuis, The competitive position of hub airports in Transatlantic market. J. A. Tran., 11, 1, 106-130 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Veeldhuis, E. Kroes Dynamics in relative network perfornance of the main European hub airports, (Proceeding of the Eur. Tran. Conf. Cambridge, 9-11 September 2002) [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Danesi, Measuring airline hub timetable co-ordination and connectivity: definitione of a new index and application to a sample of European hubs. Euro. Tran., 34, 54-74 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  39. M.L. Tam, W.H. Lam & H.P. Lo, Modeling air passenger travel behavior on airport ground access mode choices. Transportm., 4, 135-153 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. D.A. Tsamboulas, & A. Nikoleris, Passengers’ willingness to pay for airport ground access time savings. Tran. Res. Part A: Pol. Prac., 42, 1274-1282 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  41. M.L. Tam, W.H. Lam & H.P. Lo, Incorporating passenger perceived service quality in airport ground access mode choice model. Transportm., 6, 3-17 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. R.C. Jou, D.A. Hensher & T.L. Hsu, Airport ground access mode choice behavior after the introduction of a new mode: A case study of Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan. Tran. Res. Part E: Log. Tran. Rev., 47, 371-381 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. T. Budd, T. Ryley, & S. Ison, Airport ground access and private car use: a segmentation analysis. J. Tran. Geog., 36, 106-115 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. I. Gokasar & G. Gunay, Mode choice behavior modeling of ground access to airports: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J. A. Tran. Man., 59, 1-7 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  45. G. Burghouwt, & R. Redondi, Connectivity in air transport networks: an assessment of models and applications. J. Tran. Econ. Pol., 47, 1, 35-53 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  46. D. Tłoczyński, Konkurencja na polskim rynku usług transportu lotniczego, (University of Gdańsk Publisher, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  47. D. Tłoczyński, The analysis of transport accessibility in airports as the part of the competitiveness in regions. Case study of Polish Airports, (17th Inter. Conf. Tran. Sc. Slovenia: Mar. Tran. Log. Sc., 2015) [Google Scholar]
  48. P. Koster, E. Kroes, E.T. Verhoef, Travel Time Variability and Airport Accessibility, Tinb. Inst. Disc. Pap., 061/3, 7 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  49. A. Reynolds-Feighan, P. McLay, Accessibility and attractiveness of European airports: A simple small community perspective. J. A. Tran. Man., 12, 315 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  50. R.K. Yin, Case Study Methods., Handbook of complementary methods in education research J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.). 111-122 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  51. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  52. Rīgas satiksme. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  53. Moovit. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  54. ShipPax Information, (Sweden, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  55. Avinor. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  56. Copenhagen Airport. downloaded from (10.03.2018), [Google Scholar]
  57. Gdansk Airport. downloaded from (10.02.2018) [Google Scholar]
  58. Finavia airports. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  59. Palanga Airport. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  60. Riga Airport. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  61. Rostock Airport. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  62. Swedavia airports. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  63. Tallin Airport. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  64. Google.maps. downloaded from: (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  65. I. Kotowska, Short Sea Shipping in the light of the idea of sustainable development of transport (Szczecin: Sc. Publ. Hou. Mar. Univ. 2014) [Google Scholar]
  66. Direct Ferries. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  67. Tripadvisor. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  68. Visitcopenhagen. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  69. Visitoslo. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  70. Visitstockholm. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  71. ZTM. downloaded from (10.01.2018) [Google Scholar]
  72. D. Tłoczyński, M. Wołek, Komplementarność i substytucja w pasażerskim transporcie kolejowym i lotniczym. Procesy integracyjne wybranych systemów transportowych, M. Michałowska (ed.), (Academic of Economy in Katowice, 263, 2007) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.