Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 58, 2018
GLOBMAR 2018 - Global Maritime Conference
Article Number 01031
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 03 December 2018
  1. Angheloiu, C.; Chaudhuri, G. and Sheldrick, L. (2017) Future Tense: Alternative Futures as a Design Method for Sustainability Transitions, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, S3213-S3225, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. BBC (2018a) US steel and aluminium imports face big tariffs, Available at <>>. accessed 27th March 2018 [Google Scholar]
  3. BBC (2018b) Spy poisoning: Russia accuses US of ‘expulsion blackmail’, Available at accessed 27th March 2018 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., Sushandoyo, D. (2015) Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry, Research Policy, 44(5), 1017-1028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dixon, T. (2011) ‘Low Carbon’ Scenarios, Roadmaps, Transitions and Pathways: an Overview and Discussion, Retrofit 2050 Working Paper, October 2011. Available at: accessed 2nd March 2018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferdinand P (2016) Westward ho-the China dream and ‘one belt, one road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping, International Affairs, 92 (4), 941-957 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geels, F.W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. [Google Scholar]
  8. Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31, 21-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geels, F.W., McMeekin A. Mylan J., Southerton D. (2015). A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Global Environmental Change, 34, 1-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hess, D.J. (2013) Industrial fields and countervailing power: The transformation of distributed solar energy in the United States, Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 847-855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hickman R, Banister D (2007) Looking over the horizon: Transport and reduced CO2emissions in the UK by 2030, Transport Policy, 14 (5) 377-387 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jonkeren O, Jourquin B, Rietveld P (2011) Modal-split effects of climate change: The effect of low water levels on the competitive position of inland waterway transport in the river Rhine area, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45 (10) 1007-1019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth, Ecological Economics, 70(5) 873-880. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Köhler, J.; Geels, F.; Kern, F.; Onsongo, E. and Wieczorek, A. (2017) A research agenda for the Sustainability Transitions Research Network, Paper obtained from The Sustainability Transitions Research Network (STRN). [Google Scholar]
  15. McDowall, W. (2014) Exploring possible transition pathways for hydrogen energy: A hybrid approach using socio-technical scenarios and energy system modelling, Futures, 63, 1-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. McDowall, W. (2016) Are scenarios of hydrogen vehicle adoption optimistic? A comparison with historical analogies, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 20, 48-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, BehrensIII WW (1972) The Limits to Growth, Club of Rome, New York, 205 pp. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pettit S, Wells P, Haider J, Abouarghoub W (2017) Revisiting history: Can shipping achieve a second sociotechnical transition for carbon emissions reduction?, Transportation Research Part D, [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith, A., Voβ, J.-P., and Grin, J. (2010) Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of a multi-level perspective and its challenges, Research Policy, 39(4), 435-448. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tainter, J.A. (1988). The collapse of complex societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.