EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 63 (2019) SHS Web Conf., 63 (2019) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 63, 2019
Modernism, Modernisation and the Rural Landscape, Proceedings of the MODSCAPES_conference2018 & Baltic Landscape Forum
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 12
Section Modernist Rural Planning: Cultural and Physical Legacies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196304002
Published online 15 April 2019
  1. MAURET, É. 1955. “Problèmes de l’équipement rural dans l’aménagement du territoire”, L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, n° 60: 42-45. [Google Scholar]
  2. ESTIENNE, I. 2011. “L’aménagement comme stratégie professionnelle.L’exemple de cinq paysagistes formés à la section du paysage et de l’art desjardins de Versailles en 1946-1948”, Projets de paysage. Retrieved from: http://www.projetsdepaysage.fr/fr/l_amenagement_comme_strategie_professionnelle [available 10 June 2018]. [Google Scholar]
  3. DETHIER, J. 1970. “Soixante ans d’urbanisme au Maroc. L’évolution des idées et des réalisations”, Bulletin Économique et Social du Maroc, n° 118-119: 5-56. [Google Scholar]
  4. SUISSE, P. 1956. “L’exode rural”, Bulletin Économique et Social du Maroc, n° 68: 459-467. [Google Scholar]
  5. COHEN J.-L.; ELEB M. 1998. Casablanca. Mythes et figures d’une aventure urbaine, Paris, Hazan. [Google Scholar]
  6. ELEB, M. 2010. “Interiorized Exterior: The Courtyard in Casablanca’s Publicand Company Housing (1910-60)”, in N.O. Rabbat (ed.), The Courtyard House. From Cultural Reference to Universal Relevance, London, Ashgate: 101-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086866-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. BIANCA, S. 2000. The Urban Form in the Arab World: Past and Present, New York, Thames & Hudson. [Google Scholar]
  8. PETRUCCIOLI, A. 2006. “The Courtyard House: Typological Variations overSpace and Time”, in B. Edwards, M. Sibley, M. Hakmi et al. (eds.), Courtyard Housing. Past, Present and Future, Abingdon-New York, Taylor & Francis: 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646724-11 [Google Scholar]
  9. CANIGGIA, G. (1973) 1981. “La casa-corte: definizione, diffusione, origini ed accezione comense”, in Id., Struttura dello spazio antropico. Studi e note, Florence, Alinea: 13-62. [Google Scholar]
  10. CANIGGIA, G. 1986. “La casa e la città dei primi secoli”, in P. Maretto, La casa veneziana nella storia della città dalle origini all’Ottocento, Venice, Marsilio: 5-52. [Google Scholar]
  11. Articles et mémoires. Hommage à Michel Écochard (1990). Paris, Paul Geuthner. [Google Scholar]
  12. VERDEIL, E. 2012. “Michel Écochard in Lebanon and Syria (1956-1968). The Spread of Modernism, the Building of the Independent States and the Rise ofLocal professionals of planning”, Planning Perspective, vol. 27, n° 2: 249-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2012.646774 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. AVERMAETE, T. 2014. “Michel Écochard (1905-1985)”, in Id.; M. Casciato, Casablanca Chandigarh. A Report on Modernization, Montréal-Zürich, CCA-Park Books: 91-92. [Google Scholar]
  14. ÉCOCHARD M. 1950. “Urbanisme et construction pour le plus grand nombre”, Annales de l’Institut Technique du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics, n° 148: 1-12 [republ. as ID. 1951. “Problèmes d’Urbanisme au Maroc”, Bulletin Économique et Social du Maroc, n° 52: 28-35]. [Google Scholar]
  15. MAS, P. 1954. “Problèmes d’habitat musulman au Maroc”, Bulletin Économique et Social du Maroc, n° 62: 201-208. [Google Scholar]
  16. MAURET, É. 1954. “Problème de l’habitat rural dans la région de Rabat”, Bulletin Économique et Social du Maroc, n° 64: 587-599. [Google Scholar]
  17. AVERMAETE, T. 2010. “Framing the Afropolis. Michel Écochard and the African City for the Greatest Number”, OASE, n° 82: 77-99. Retrieved from https://www.oasejournal.nl/en/Issues/82/FramingTheAfropolis [available on 29 January 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  18. ÉCOCHARD, M. 1955. “Habitat Musulman au Maroc”, L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, n° 60: 36-39. [Google Scholar]
  19. GROPIUS, W. 1931. “Flach-, Mittel-oder Hochbau?”, Das Neue Frankfurt, vol. 5, n° 2: 22-34. [Google Scholar]
  20. GIURA LONGO, T. 1975. “Contributi italiani al tema dell’unità d’abitazione / The Italian Contribution to the Residential Neighborhood Design Concept”, Lotus, n° 9: 62-75, 213-216. [Google Scholar]
  21. COHEN, J.-L. 1992. “Il Gruppo degli Architetti Marocchini e ‘L’Habitat du plusgrand nombre’ ”, Rassegna, n° 52: 58-67. [Google Scholar]
  22. AVERMAETE, T. 2015. “From Knoxville to Bidonville: ATBAT and the Architecture of the French Welfare State”, in Id.; M. Swenarton; D. van den Heuvel, Architecture and the Welfare State, Abingdon-New York, Routledge:219-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766928-18 [Google Scholar]
  23. DE MAISONSEUL, J. 1955, “La reconstruction des regions sinistrées par le séisme du Chéliff”, L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, n° 60: 14-21. [Google Scholar]
  24. TYRWHITT, J.; SERT, J.L.; ROGERS, E.N. 1952. The Heart of the City: Towards the Humanization of Urban Life, New York, Pellegrini & Cudahy. [Google Scholar]
  25. MUMFORD, E. 2002. The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism. 1928-1960, Cambridge-London, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. ÉCOCHARD, M. (1953) 1979, “Habitat pour le plus grande nombre. Position du probème par rapport à la Charte de l’Habitat”, in V. Bodiansky (ed.), CIAM 9, Aix-en-Provence -19-25 Juillet 1953, Contribution à la Charte de l’Habitat, Nendeld, Kraus Reprint. [Google Scholar]
  27. CHAOUNI A. 2011. “Depoliticizing Group GAMMA: contesting modernism in Morocco”, in D. Lu (ed.), Third World Modernism. Architecture, Development and Identity, London-New York, Routledge: 57-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840993-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. ZANUSO, M. 1955. “Adalberto Libera. Unità d’abitazione orizzontale nel quartiere Tuscolano a Roma”, Casabella-continuità, n° 207: 30. [Google Scholar]
  29. BERNASCONI, E.L.G. 2017. “Reconstruction and Identity. The Case Study ofAgadir’s Earthquake”, Urbanistica Informazioni (Special issue: Proceedings of the 10° INU Study Day “Crisis and rebirth of Cities”, Naples, 15 December 2017), vol. 41, n° 272 s.i.: 137-142. Retrieved from: http://www.urbanisticainformazioni.it/IMG/pdf/ui_272si_02_sessione_02.pdf[available on 29 January 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  30. BERNASCONI, E.L.G. 2016. Verso un’antica lingua moderna. La città di Agadire l’opera di Jean-François Zevaco, PhD dissertation, IUAV University of Venice. [Google Scholar]
  31. RAGON, M.; TASTEMAIN, H. 1999. Zevaco, Paris, Cercle d’Art. [Google Scholar]
  32. “Architecture marocaine contemporaine: J.-F. Zevaco” (1964), a+u -Revue africaine d’architecture et d’urbanisme, n° 1: 12-22. [Google Scholar]
  33. HOFBAUER, L. 2010. “Transferts de modèles architecturaux au Maroc. L’exemple de Jean-François Zévaco, architecte (1916-2003)”, Les Cahiers d’EMAM, n° 20: 71-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/emam.77 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. HOLOD, R. (ed.) 1983. Architecture and Community. Building in the Islamic World Today, London, Islamic Publications: 89-96. [Google Scholar]
  35. GARCÍA-HUIDOBRO, F.; TORRES TORRITI, D.; TUGAS, N. 2008. ¡El Tiempo Construye! Time Builds!, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili. [Google Scholar]
  36. MCGUIRK, J. 2011. “PREVI. The Metabolist Utopia”, Domus, n° 946: 58-71. Retrieved from: https://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/2011/04/21/previthe-metabolist-utopia.html [available on 29 January 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  37. KAHATT, S.S. 2011. “Agrupación Espacio and the CIAM Peru Group:Architecture and the City in the Peruvian Modern Project”, in D. Lu (ed.), Op.cit.: 85-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840993-10 [Google Scholar]
  38. ELEB, M. 2000. “An Alternative to Functionalist Universalism: Écochard, Candilis and ATBAT-Afrique”, in S. Williams Goldhagen, R. Legault (eds.), Anxious Modernism: Experimentation in Postwar Architectural Culture, Montréal-Cambridge, CCA-MIT Press: 55-73. [Google Scholar]
  39. AVERMAETE, T. 2010. “Nomadic Experts and Travelling Perspective: ColonialModernity and the Epistemological Shift in Modern Architectural Culture”, in Id., S. Karakayali, M. von Osten (eds.), Colonial Modern. Aesthetics of the Past Rebellions for the Future, London, Black Dog Publishing: 130-149. [Google Scholar]
  40. AVERMAETE, T. 2009. “CIAM, Team X, and the Rediscovery of African Settlements. Between Dogon and Bidonville”, in J.-F. Lejeune, M. Sabatino (eds.), Modern Architecture and the Mediterranean. Vernacular Dialogues and Contested Identities, London-New York, Routledge: 251-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203871904-22 [Google Scholar]
  41. SMITHSON, A. 2001. “How to Recognize and Read Mat-Building. MainstreamArchitecture as it Has Developed towards the Mat-Building”, in H. Sarkis (ed.), CASE: Le Corbusier’s Venice Hospital and the Mat Building Revival, Munich-London-New York, Prestel Verlag: 90-103. [Google Scholar]
  42. HYDE T. 2001. “How to Construct an Architectural Genealogy. Mat-Building…Mat-Buildings…Matted-Buildings”, in H. Sarkis (ed.), Op. cit.: 104-117. [Google Scholar]
  43. OXMAN, R.; SHADAR, H.; BELFERMAN E. 2002. “Casbah: a brief history of a design concept”, arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, vol. 6, n° 4, p. 321-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135503001854 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.