EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 68 (2019) SHS Web Conf., 68 (2019) 01016 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 68, 2019
7th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 10
Section Society: Justice and Security
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196801016
Published online 25 November 2019
  1. I. Ponkine, N. Mikhaleva, M. Kouznetsov, Sur les violations des droits des enfants pendant leur «adoption» par des couples homosexuels ou par des individus homosexuels. Available: http://strasbourg-reor.org/?topicid=1082 [Google Scholar]
  2. Н. Квiт, Iнститут сурогатного материнства: проблеми колiзiиного регулювання (Альманах мiжнарощного права, 2014, Вип. 14, С. 39) [Google Scholar]
  3. В. Киселев, Религия и экстракорпоральное оплощотворение(Виоэтическии словарь, 2006, p. 99). Available: http://dialektika-eniology.narod.ru/dictionary.0606.htm [Google Scholar]
  4. Основю сощиальнои конщепщии Русскои Православнои Церкви, проблемю биоэтики. Available: https://mospat.ru/ru/documents/social-concepts/xii/ [Google Scholar]
  5. О крещении млащенщев, рощившихся при помощи «суррогатнои матери». Available: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3481024.html [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Banda Vergara Dignidad de la persona y reproducción humana asistida (Revista de Derecho, 1998, IX, p. 7–42) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Gómez de la Torre Vargas La fecundación in vitro y la filiación (Santiago de Chile, 1993, pp. 201, 204–205) [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Vayena, PatrickJ., Rowe, P., DavidGriffin, Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction (Report of a meeting on «Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction» held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 17–21 September 2001), p. 20–21. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42576/1/9241590300.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Redondo, F. Valente, M. Esteves, M. Perquilhas, Surrogacy: a clash of competing rights, 2017, p. 7. Available: http://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/Team%20Portugal%202%20semi%20final%20B.pdf [Google Scholar]
  10. Н. Квiт, Iнститут сурогатного материнства: проблеми колiзiиного регулювання (Альманах мiжнарощного права, 2014, Вип. 14, С. 42) [Google Scholar]
  11. The Pervomaysk city court of Kharkiv region in Ukraine July, 3 2013 judgement in case No. 632/1313/13-щ. Available: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/32185130 [Google Scholar]
  12. Michigan Court of Appeals June 1, 1992 judgement in case Doe v. Attorney General, 487 N.W.2d 484 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). Available: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2191740/doe-v-attorney-general/ [Google Scholar]
  13. Children risk being “commodities” as surrogacy spreads, UN rights expert warns. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22763&LangID=E [Google Scholar]
  14. Эксперт ООН: с распространением суррогатного материнства щети могут превратиться в товар. Available: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2018/03/1325142 [Google Scholar]
  15. А. Манчук, Украина: глобальнюи щентр «суррогатного материнства». Available: http://liva.com.ua/ukraina-globalnyij-czentr-surrogatnogo-materinstva.html [Google Scholar]
  16. Surrogate motherhood in the news: the courtsand legislative bodies. Available: https://www.asrm.org/news-and-publications/news-and-research/legally-speaking/surrogacy-back-in-the-news-courts-and-legislatures/ [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Allan, Is the Surrogate Involved in the Sale or Commodification of Children? (“Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights”, 2015, Chapter 7, endnote 21) [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Fulchiron, C. Bidaud-Garon, Ne punissez pas les enfants des fautes de leurs pères. Regard prospectif sur les arrêts Labassée et Mennesson de la CEDH du 26 juin 2014 (Recueil Dalloz, 2014, p. 1773) [Google Scholar]
  19. Н. Квiт, Iнститут сурогатного материнства: проблеми колiзiиного регулювання (Альманах мiжнарощного права, 2014, Вип. 14, С. 37) [Google Scholar]
  20. Labassée v. France, Case No 65941/11 and Menesson v. France, Case No 65192/11. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-145389%22] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Kleiner, Surrogate motherhood in France: the need for a change Considerations of French Private International Law, p. 61–62. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10112/10980 [Google Scholar]
  22. VfGH 11.10.2012 – B 99/12; VfGH 14.12.2011 – B 13/11-10, IPRax 2013, 271,275 [Google Scholar]
  23. VGBerlin 5.9.2012 – I-3 Wx211/12 Rs.23 L 283.12, IPRax 2014, 81; BGH 10.12.2014 – XIIZB 463/13, FamRZ 2015, 240 mAnmTobiasHelms [Google Scholar]
  24. The ethical case against surrogate motherhood: what we can learn from the law of other European countries, p.16. Available: https://www.ionainstitute.ie/assets/files/Surrogacy%20final%20PDF.pdf [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.