Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 72, 2019
International Scientific Conference: “Achievements and Perspectives of Philosophical Studies” (APPSCONF-2019)
Article Number 03035
Number of page(s) 5
Section Man in the World of Culture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197203035
Published online 28 November 2019
  1. M.R. Abdulla, Culture, Religion, and Freedom of Religion or Belief, Review of Faith and International Affairs, 16 (4), 102-115 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Z. Bauman, Liquid modernit (Piter, Saint-Petersburg, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Baumann, The Multicultural Riddle: Rethinking National, Ethnic and Religious Identities (Routledge, London, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Bosisio, Religion, culture, nation: Possible articulations from three commemorative days. Horizontes Antropológicos. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-71832018000300008. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-71832018000300199#aff1 (accessed 10 July 2019) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.Dydrov, et al., Brand in the philosophical sense: From object to person, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7, 135-139 (2018). DOI: 10,14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24339 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. А. Flier, Culturegenesis (Russian Institute of Cultural Studies, Moscow) http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/flier-kulturogenez-8l.pdf (accessed 10 July 2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. А. Gricanov, World Encyclopedia: Philosophy (ACT, Moscow, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Hill, H. Ibsen, Brand (Penguin, London, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Grillo, Cultural essentialism and cultural anxiety. Anthropological Theory, 1 (2), 157-173 (2003) DOI: 10.1177/1463499603003002002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S.A. Hurrell, D. Scholarios, The People Make the Brand»: Reducing Social Skills Gaps Through Person-Brand Fit and Human: Resource Management Practices, Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 54-67 (2014). DOI:10.1177/1094670513484508 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Klein, No logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. Canada: Vintage. (2000) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. J. Lifton, The Protean Self. Human Resilience in an Age of Fragmentation (Basic Books, N.Y., 1993). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Meniavа, V. Neveleva, The socio-cultural paradigm of consensus as the basis for the future strategy of future, Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniya, 3, 55-69 (2017). DOI: 10.17805/ggz.2017.3.6 [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Nelson, Beyond prometheus: Creativity, discourse, ideology, and the Anthropocene, Knowledge Cultures, 6 (2), 111-131 (2018). DOI: 10.22381/KC6220188 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Nietzshe, The Use and Abuse of History for Life: http://nietzsche.ru/works/main-works/history/(accessed 10 July 2019) (1874) [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Tolstyh, Tradition. New Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://terme.ru/termin/tradicija.html (accessed 10 July 2019) (2000) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Petrilli, Identity, freedom, and answerability in the global world: A semiotic approach, Semiotica, 171, 97-114 (2008). DOI: 10.1515/SEMI.2008.069. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Silverman, Contested Cultural Heritage: Religion, Nationalism, Erasure, and Exclusion in a Global World (Springer International Publishing Basel, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Trufanova, Human in the labyrinth of identities, Voprosy filosofii, 2, 13-22 (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.