Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2020
The 1st International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (ICSH 2019)
Article Number 01040
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207601040
Published online 29 April 2020
  1. J. Davies, The Birth of the Anthropocene, California: UC Press (2016). https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520289987/the-birth-of-the-anthropocene [Google Scholar]
  2. E.C. Ellis, Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction, UK: Oxford University Press (2018). https://global.oup.com/academic/product/anthropocene-a-very-short-introduction-9780198792987?cc=id&lang=en& [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Snyder, Journal of Business Research, 104:333–339 (2019). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304564 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Dever, What is philosophical methodology? In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, H. Cappelen, T. Gendler, J.P. Hawthorne (Eds.). UK: Oxford University Press (2016). https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.001.0001/o xfordhb-9780199668779-e-34#oxfordhb-9780199668779-e-34-div1-3 [Google Scholar]
  5. R.V. Davis, Earth Sci. Hist., 30:63–84 (2011). https://earthscienceshistory.org/doi/abs/10.17704/eshi.30.1.p8327x7042g3q989 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Dumanoski, The End of the Long Summer: Why We Must Remake Our Civilization to Survive on a Volatile Earth, (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2009). https://www.amazon.com/End-Long-Summer-Civilization-Volatile/dp/0307396096 [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Fagan, The Long Summer: How Climate Changed Civilization, (Cambridge: Basic Books, 2004). https://www.nhbs.com/the-long-summer-book [Google Scholar]
  8. P.J. Crutzen, The Anthropocene. In: Earth System Science in the Anthropocene. E. Ehlers, T. Krafft (Eds). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (2006), https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Luciano, The theory of the Anthropocene: Inquiry into the ‘age of Anthropos’ between natural sciences and environmental humanities, [Thesis] Environment and Natural Resources, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences School of Social Sciences University of Iceland, Iceland (2018). https://www.academia.edu/download/57103125/Eugenio_Luciano_MA_Thesis.pdf [Google Scholar]
  10. T.J. Braje, Journal of Archaeological Research, 23, 4:369–396 (2015). http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/43956793 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Maslin, S. Lewis, New Scientist, 239, 3188:24–25 (2018). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0262407918313484 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Amos, Welcome to the Meghalayan Age a new phase in history, BBC Science Correspondent, 18 July 2018, [Online] dari https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-44868527 (2018). [Accessed on 2 July 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Unkelbach, K. Kashima, D. Enters, C. Dulamsuren, G. Punsalpaamuu, H. Behling, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 530:1–14 (2019). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018219301300\ [Google Scholar]
  14. C.M. Silva, G. Arbilla, R. Soares, W. Machado, Rev. Virtual Quim., 10, 6:1648–1658 (2018). [in Portugease] http://rvq.sbq.org.br https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330641355_The_new_Meghalayan_Age_Wha t_does_it_Imply_for_the_Anthropocene_Age [Google Scholar]
  15. T. LeCain, International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 3, 1:1–28 (2015). https://www.history-culture-modernity.org/articles/10.18352/hcm.474/ [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Malm, A. Hornborg, The Anthropocene Review, 1, 1:62–69 (2014). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019613516291 [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Alberts, Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 16:5–17 (2011). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0969725X.2011.641341 [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Palsson, B. Szerszynski, S. Sörlin, J. Marks, B. Avril, C. Crumley, et al., Environmental Science and Policy, 28:3–13 (2013). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1462901112002079 [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Szerszynski, Oxford Literary Review, 34:165–184 (2012). https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/olr.2012.0040 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dalby, S. The Anthropocene Review, 3(1), 33-51 (2016). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019615618681 [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Toivanen, K. Lummaa, A. Majava, P. Järvensivu, V. Lähde, T. Vaden, et al., The Anthropocene Review, 4, 3:183–198 (2017). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019617738099 [Google Scholar]
  22. S.L. Lewis, M.A. Maslin, Nature, 519, 7542:171–180 (2015). https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14258 [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Butchvarov, Anthropocentrism in Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter (2015). https://www.amazon.com/Anthropocentrism-Philosophy-Eide-Panayot-Butchvarov/dp/1614517924 [Google Scholar]
  24. S.S. Cerkvenik, Non-humanism, [Online] http://web.colby.edu/humanslashnature/2015/11/15/non-humanism/ (2015). [Accessed on 2 July 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Chernilo, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 1:44–60 (2017). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1368431016651874 [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Beever, Anthropocentrism in the Anthropocene, In: Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, Dominick A. DellaSala dan Michael I. Goldstein (Eds.). Oxford, Waltham MA: Elsevier (2018), p. 39–44. https://www.elsevier.com/books/encyclopedia-of-the-anthropocene/dellasala/978-0-12-809665-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. M.J. Loux, T.M. Crisp, Metaphysics: A contemporary introduction. UK: Taylor & Francis (2017). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315637242 [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Dürbeck, C. Schaumann, H. Sullivan, Ecozon, 6, 1:118–136 (2015). http://ecozona.eu/article/view/642 [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, C.N. Waters, A.D. Barnosky, P.K. Haff, The Anthropocene Review, 1, 1:34–43 (2014). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019613514953 [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Zalasiewicz, C.N. Waters, M. Williams, C.P. Summerhayes, The Anthropocene as a Geological Time Unit: A Guide to the Scientific Evidence and Current Debate. UK: Cambridge University Press (2019). https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=U7-GDwAAQBAJ&o [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Heikkurinen, J. Rinkinen, T. Järvensivu, K. Wilén, T. Ruuska, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113:705–714 (2016). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652615018399 [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, A. Norrie, Critical realism: Essential readings. UK: Routledge (2013). https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=-wz6N9uBpnYC&oi [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Harman, Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago: Open Court Publishing (2011). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Hz6PLV_1R-QC&dq [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Harman, Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Prahran: Re.press (2009). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=b7YEnwEACAAJ&dq [Google Scholar]
  35. C.N. Waters, I.J. Fairchild, F.M.G. McCarthy, C.S.M. Turney, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, Geology Today, 34, 5:182–187 (2018). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gto.12245 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.