Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 85, 2020
7th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Society: Values and Justice
Published online 02 December 2020
  1. UN Sustainable Development Goals (2015). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  2. Mother or Nothing: The Agony of Infertility. Bulletin of the World Health Organization (2010). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Stefanchuk, Reproductive Rights of an Individual: Concept, System, Peculiarities of Realization (2004). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Brashovianu, International Experience in Legislative Regulation of the Reproductive Technologies Use (Including Surrogacy), 60 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Nelson, Global Trade and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Regulatory Challenges in International Surrogacy. J Law Med Ethics. 41, 240–253 (2013). Retrieved from [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Case of S.H. and Others v. Austria (Application no. 57813/00) (2011). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  7. Judgement of the Berehovo District Court of Zakarpattia Oblast, case no. 1-131/11/ (2011). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  8. Threats of Surrogacy in Ukraine: Children without Parents and Citizenship (2018). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  9. Case of Mennesson v. France (Application no. 65192/11) (2014). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  10. Case of D. and Others v. Belgium (Application no. 29176/13) (2014). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  11. Case of Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (Application no. 25358/12) (2017). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  12. Case of Laborie and Others v. France (Application no. 44024/13) (2017). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  13. Case of Foulon and Bouvet v. France (Application no. 9063/14 and 10410/14) (2016). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  14. Legislation of Italy in the Field of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  15. Case of Evans v. The United Kingdom (Application no. 6339/05) (2007). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  16. Case of Vo v. France (Application no. 53924/00) (2004). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  17. Case of Parrillo v. Italy (Application no. 46470/11) (2015). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Diadiun, Reproductive Sphere as an Object of Criminal Law Protection: Features of Liability Regulation, 198 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Blinov, The Doctrine of Criminal Law Protection of the Patient's Rights and Freedoms (thesis for a Doctor's degree), 561 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Cherevko, Criminal Legal Analysis of International Legislation on the Norm of Criminal Liability for Illegal Abortion. Law Forum. 3, 733–738 (2013). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  21. Case of Dickson v. The United Kingdom (Application no. 44362/04) (2007). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  22. Case of A, B AND C v. Ireland (Application no. 25579/05) (2010). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Chovhan. Prisoners' Rights Restriction: Legal Nature and Justification, 608 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.