Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208801030]


Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 88, 2020
International Scientific Forum “Issues of Modern Linguistics and the Study of Foreign Languages in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (dedicated to World Science Day for Peace and Development)” (LLT Forum 2020)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Conference 1 - Fundamental Problems of Modern Theoretical and Applied Linguistics in an Interdisciplinary Aspect in the era of High Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208801005
Published online 24 December 2020
  1. R. E. Barash, A. Yu. Antonovskiy, A study of social movements from the systemic communication standpoint: is a scientific theory of political protest possible?, in Philosophical Journal, 11(2), 91-105. doi: 10.21146/2072-0726-2018-11-2-91-105 (2018) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Berg, Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning, in International journal of e-politics, 8(1), 14-29. (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Deutsch, P.T. Coleman, E.C. Marcus, The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1264 p. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Fisher, W. Ury, B. Patton, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving, New York: Penguin Books (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Baudrillard, Simulyakry i simulyacii [Simulacres et Simulation – Simulacra and simulation]. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom «Postum», 240 p. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Jungherr, Jürgens E-Petitionen in Deutschland: Zwischen niedrigschwelligem Partizipationsangebot und quasi-plebiszitärer Nutzung [E-petitions in Germany: Between low-threshold participation offer and quasi-plebiscitary use], in Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen [Journal of Parliamentary Issues], 1, 521-534 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. L.V. Kazimirchik, The phenomenon of mediatization of public policy: theoretical and methodological aspect, in Political science. Theory and practice of social development, 11, 99-103 (2014) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  8. V.I. Kurbatov, NET-Thinking: New Realities of the Information Age, in Humanitarians of the South of Russia, 6(6), 173–181 (2017) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  9. L.F. Luna-Reyes, Opportunities and challenges for digital governance in a world of digital participation, in Information polity, 22. 2-3, 197-205 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Lundby, (Ed). Mediatization of Communication, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 752 p. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Madsen, How to win an argument (Even when you’re wrong) (Piter. St. Petersburg, 2013) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Oniszczuk, Mediatisation of Politics and Politicisation of the Media. Two Dimensions of the Relationship, in Studiów Medioznawczych, 4(47), 1-15 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. E. Pronina, “Living Text”: Four Styles of Net Thinking, in Moscow University Bulletin. Series. 10, Journalism, 6, 74–80 (2001) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  14. L.N. Rebrina, N.L. Shamne, Systemic-Communicative Dimensions of Modern Protest (based on German-Language Online Petitions), in Scientific dialogue, 3, 151-167. (2020a) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]
  15. L.N. Rebrina, N. L. Shamne, E.A. Eltanskaya, Modern protest communication in Russia and Germany: important issues in research methodology, in WUT, 10th International Conference “Word, Utterance, Text: Cognitive, Pragmatic and Cultural Aspects”. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 1505-1514. doi: 10.15405/2020.08.174. (2020b) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Small, G. Vorgan, I-Brain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind (Harper-Collins, New York, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  17. V.N. Stepanov, Transgressiveness as an essential characteristic of modern media text in the world network, in Actual problems of stylistics, 2, 149-158 (2016) (in Russ.) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.