Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 90, 2021
International Conference on Entrepreneurial Competencies in a Changing World (ECCW 2020)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 9
Section Stabilization and Development of SMEs in Rural Areas
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219001014
Published online 07 January 2021
  1. OECD, The New Rural Paradigm – Policies and Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing (2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Rumpel, O. Slach, J. Koutský, Měkké faktory regionálního rozvoje [Soft factors of regional development]. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ambrosio-Albalá, J. Bastiaensen. The new territorial paradigm of rural development: Theoretical foundations from systems and institutional theories. Antwerp: Institute of development policy and management (2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Falkowski, Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER in Poland. Journal of rural studies. 32, 70–79 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Pělucha, Teorie a realita podpory územní soudržnosti v politice rozvoje venkova EU v ČR ve střednědobém horizontu let 2004–2013 [Theory and reality of support for territorial cohesion in the EU ruraldevelopment policy in the Czech Republic in the medium term of 2004–2013]. Habilitační práce. Praha: NF VŠE (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Varvasovszky, R. Brugha, Stakeholder analysis. Healthpolicy and planning. 15(3), 338–45 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Perlín, A. Šimčíková, Criteria of a successful rural municipality. Europa XXI. 17, 29–43 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Binek, H. Svobodová, J. Holeček, I. Galvasová, K. Chabičovská, Synergie ve venkovském prostoru. Aktéři a nástroje rozvoje venkova [Synergies in rural areas. Actors and tools of rural development]. Brno: GaREP Publishing (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Binek, H. Svobodová, J. Holeček, I. Galvasová, J. Martének, Synergie ve venkovském prostoru. Paradoxy rozvoje venkova [Synergies in rural areas. Paradoxes of rural development]. Brno: GaREP Publishing (2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Bernard, Individuální charakteristiky kandidátů ve volbách do zastupitelstev obcí a jejich vliv na volební výsledky [Individual characteristics of candidates in municipal elections and their influence on election results]. Sociologický časopis. 48(4), 613–640 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Hamplová, K. Provazníková, Opinion and Attitudes of Entrepreneurs of Small and Medium-Sized Business in the Czech Republic Conditions. Procedia Economics and Finance. 23, 942–947 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Knickel, H. Renting, Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis. 40(4), 512–528 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Faloudi, From European Spatial Development to Territorial Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies. 40(6), 667–678 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy. 6(1), 65–78 (1995) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Bosworth, Community-Based Entrepreneurship and Rural Development. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 21(3), 501–503 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Coleman, Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94(1), 95-120 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Larsson. EU in the village: LEADER II, governance and rural development. In: L. Dargan, M. Shucksmith, LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis. 48 (3),274–290 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Perlín, Představitelé veřejné správy jako aktéři lokálního rozvoje [Representatives of public administration as actors of local development]. In Problémy stabilizace venkovského osídlení ČR. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, 133–151 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Woods. Rural Geography. Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London: SAGE (2005) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Pospěch, M. Delín, T. Doucha, J. Drlík, F. Nohel, D. Spěšná, Vynalézání venkova v ČR po roce 1989 [Rural invention in the Czech Republic after 1989]. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Hampl, M. Marada, Sociogeografická regionalizace Česka [Sociogeographical regionalization of the Czech Republic]. Geografie. 120(3), 397–421 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Hoggart, H. Buller. Rural development. A Geographical Perspective. New York: Routledge (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Skála, Vliv sociálního kapitálu na rozvojový potenciál venkovských obcí [The influence of social capital on the development potential of rural communities]. Acta Politologica. 9(2), 40–56 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. G. R. Gibbs, Analyzing Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Švaříček, K.Šeďová, Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách [Qualitative research in pedagogical sciences]. Praha: Portál (2007) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.