Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 02021
Number of page(s) 11
Section Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219202021
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Lisý, J. (2005). Ekonómia v novej ekonomike. IURA Edition. [Google Scholar]
  2. Taheri, H. and P. Taheri. (1964). Globalization and its dimensions. Kaboudrahang Press of Jam Jamshid. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hepburn, C. (2010), Environmental policy, government, and the marke. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26 (2), 1-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. THE 17 GOALS. (FAO 2015). Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development . Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals [Google Scholar]
  5. Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., De Boer, Y., Rockstrom, J., Kathrin, L., Kok, M. (2015). Beyond Cockpitism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7(2), 1351-1660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauhardt, Ch. (2014). Solutions to the crisis? The Green New Deal, Degrowth, and the Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the capitalist growth economy from an ecofeminist economics perspective. Ecological Economics, 102, 60-68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, P., Klitkou, A., Steen, M. (2019). Green growth - A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 146, 390-402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jinxia, W., Hjikun, H., Yang, H. (2017). Overview of Impacts of Climate Change and Adaptation in China’s Agricultur., Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(1), 1-17. [Google Scholar]
  9. Šimek, M. (2019). Skleníkové plyny z pudy a zemědelství – vlastnosti, produkce, spotřeba, emise a možnosti jejich snížení. Akademie věd české republiky Strategie AV, 21,131. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galaz, V., Gars, J., Moberg, F., Nykvist, B., Repinski, C. (2015). Why Ecologists Should Care about Financial Markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(10), 572. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zahar, A. (2017). Climate Change Finance and International Law. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY : Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  12. Stanek, P., Doliak, D., Ivanova, P. (2017). Globálne zdroje hrozba alebo šanca? Wolters Kluwer, Edícia Ekonómia, 51. [Google Scholar]
  13. Oostendorp, R., Asseldonk, M., Gathiaka, J., Mulwa, R., Radeny, M., Recha, J., Wattei, C., Wesenbeeck, L. (2019). Inclusive agribusiness under climate change: a briefreview of the role of financ. Environmental Sustainability, 41, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  14. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2016). The State of Food and AGRICULTURE Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hong, H., Karolyi, A., Scheinknian, J. A. (2020). Climate Finance. ,Review of Financial Studies, 101. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wareen, P. (2020). Blind spots in climate finance for innovation. Advances in Climate Change Research, 11(1), 60-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kling, G., Volz, U.(2020).The impact of climate vulnerability on firms’ cost of capital and access to finance,World Development, 137 ,60. [Google Scholar]
  18. Marke, A., Sylvester.B. (2018). Decoding the Current Global Climate Finance Architecture. Transforming Climate Finance and Green Investment with Blockchains, 35-59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Havemann, T., Negra, C., Werneck, F.(2020). Blended finance for agriculture: exploring the constraints and possibilities of combining financial instruments for sustainable transitions. Agriculture and Human Values, 37, 1281 -1292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trend (2020). Členka výkonnej rady ECB: Klimatická zmena je väčším rizikom než pandémia. Retrieved from: https://www.trend.sk/spravy/clenka-vykonnej-rady-ecb-klimaticka-zmena-je-vacsim-rizikom-nez-pandemia [Google Scholar]
  21. Drapáková, D.,Koreň, M.(2020). Nová zelená architektúra Spoločnej poľnohospodárskej politiky EÚ. Retrieved from: www.euractiv.sk, [Google Scholar]
  22. Sobocká, J. (2005). Possible Consequences of Climate Change on Soil Properties of the SR. Životné prostredie, 39(4) ,182-186. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.