EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 92 (2021) SHS Web of Conf., 92 (2021) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Financial Management and Financial Markets
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219203003
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Hardaker, J. B., Lien, G., Anderson, J. R., Huirne, R. B. (2015). Coping with risk in agriculture: Applied decision analysis. CABI. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huirne, R. B., Meuwissen, M. P., Hardaker, J. B., Anderson, J. R. (2000). Risk and risk management in agriculture: an overview and empirical results. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 1(1-2), 125-136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. OECD. (2009). Managing Risk in Agriculture: A Holistic Approach. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tangermann, S. (2011). Risk management in agriculture and the future of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development (Issue Paper 34). Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cordier, J. (2014). Comparative analysis of risk management tools supported by the 2014 Farm Bill and the CAP 2014-2020. IP/B/AGRI/IC/2014-044. Strassburg: Parlement Européen. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meraner, M., Finger, R. (2019). Risk perceptions, preferences and management strategies: evidence from a case study using German livestock farmers. Journal of Risk Research, 22(1), 110-135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. European Commission (2017). Modernising and simplifying the CAP. Background Document Economic challenges facing EU agriculture. Brussel: European Comission. [Google Scholar]
  8. De Rosa, M., McElwee, G., Smith, R. (2019). Farm diversification strategies in response to rural policy: A case from rural Italy. Land Use Policy, 81, 291-301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meuwissen, M. P., Van Asseldonk, M. A., Huirne, R. B. (2008). Income stabilisation in European agriculture: design and economic impact of risk management tools. Wageningen Academic Publishers. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cordier, J., Santeramo, F. (2020). Mutual funds and the Income Stabilisation Tool in the EU: Retrospect and Prospects. EuroChoices, 19(1), 53-58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vera, A. C., Colmenero, A. G. (2017). Evaluation of risk management tools for stabilising farm income under CAP 2014-2020. Economía agraria y recursos naturales, 17(1), 3-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meuwissen, M. P., Assefa, T. T., van Asseldonk, M. A. (2013). Supporting insurance in European agriculture: Experience of mutuals in the Netherlands. EuroChoices, 12(3), 10-16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meuwissen, M.P.M., Mey, Y.d., Van Asseldonk, M. (2018). Prospects for agricultural insurance in Europe. Agricultural Finance Review, 78(2), 174-182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pigeon, M., de Frahan, B. H., Denuit, M. (2014). Evaluation of the EU proposed farm income stabilisation tool by skew normal linear mixed models. European Actuarial Journal, 4(2), 383-409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. European Commission. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the EAFRD and repealing EC No 1698/2005. Retrieved from : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013R1305 [Google Scholar]
  16. Tropea, F. (2016). New income stabilization tools and price volatility in agricultural markets, European Parliamentary Research Services. Brussels: EPRS. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vilhelm, V., Namali Gouri Boyinova, S., Špička, J. (2018). Comparison of Risk Management Tools Under the CAP of the EU, the US Farm Bill and in the Czech Agriculture. Proceedings of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union– the present and the future, EU Member States point of view, 73.1 Monographs of Multi-Annual Programme (pp. 116-124). Warsaw: Institute of Agricultiral and Food economics. [Google Scholar]
  18. European Commission. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the EAFRD and repealing EC No 1698/2005. Retrieved from : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013R1305 [Google Scholar]
  19. European Commision (2017, October). Study on Risk Management in EU Agriculture. Retrieved from : https://op.europa.eu/sk/publication-detail/-/publication/5a935010-af78-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1 [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission (2017, December 11). Summary of main changes introduced to the four basic regulations of the CAP through the Omnibus regulation. Retrieved from : https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capoverview/summary-changes-omnibus_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Santeramo, F.G. (2018). Imperfect information and participation in insurance markets: evidence from Italy. Agricultural Finance Review, 78(2), 193-194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zubor-Nemes, A., Fogarasi, J., Kemény, G. (2018). Farmers’ responses to the changes in Hungarian agricultural insurance system. Agricultural Finance Review, 78(2), 275-288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. El Benni, N., Finger, R., Meuwissen, M. P. (2016). Potential effects of the income stabilisation tool (IST) in Swiss agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(3), 475-502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chrastinová, Z., Masár, I., Weldesenbet, T. (2017). Agricultural production risks and their solutions in Slovakia. In J. Goral & M. Wigier (Eds.), Risk in the food economy– theory and practice (pp. 149-165). Warsaw: Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej. [Google Scholar]
  25. MPSR (2019, December 20). Správa o poľnohospodárstve a potravinárstve v SR za rok 2018 (ZELENÁ SPRÁVA) Retrieved from : https://mpsr.sk/zelena-sprava-2019/122---14968/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.