Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Innovation and Investment on Industry 4.0
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219204001
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. McCord, P., Tonini, F., Liu, J. (2018). The Telecoupling GeoApp: A Web-GIS application to systematically analyze telecouplings and sustainable development. Applied Geography, 96, 16–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fargher, M. (2018). WebGIS for geography education: Towards a GeoCapabilities approach. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eldrandaly, K. A., Abdel-Basset, M., Shawky, L. A. (2019). Internet of spatial things: A new reference model with insight analysis. IEEE Access, 7, 19653–19669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sedlak, P., Komarkova, J., Piverkova, A. (2010). Spatial analyses help to find movement barriers for physically impaired people in the city environment - Case study of pardubice, Czech Republic. Wseas Transactions On Information Science And Applications, 7, 122–131. [Google Scholar]
  5. Çakmaka, E., Öndenb, I., Zafer, A. A., Eldemirc, F. (2020). Analyzing the location of city logistics centers in Istanbul by integrating Geographic Information Systems with Binary Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. Case Studies on Transport Policy. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan, A., Munir, A., Kaleem, Z., Ullah, F., Bilal, M., Nkenyereye, L., Shah, S., Nguyen, L., Islam, S., Kwak, K.S. (2020). RDSP: Rapidly Deployable Wireless Ad Hoc System for Post-Disaster Management. Sensors, 20, 548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim, D., Hong, T. L., Minhyun, K., Choongwan, K., Jimin, J., Kwangbok. (2017). Mapping the Rescue Equipment Mobilization Potential: Decision Support Tool for Emergency Management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, L., Peng, X., Zhang, F., Wen, Y., Xiao, C., Zhang, Y. (2019). A cloud-based platform for marine oil spill emergency response capability visualization. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS) (pp. 810–815). Liverpool: Curran Associates, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chriki, A., Touati, H., Snoussi, H., Kamoun, F. (2019). FANET: Communication, mobility models and security issues. Computer Networks, 163, 106877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Awange, J., Kiema, J. (2019). Environmental Geoinformatics. Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, C., Wu, J., Kohli, P., Furukawa, Y. (2017). Raster-to-vector: Revisiting floorplan transformation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 2195–2203). Venice: IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shirzadi, A., Solaimani, K., Roshan, M. H., Kavian, A., Chapi, K., Shahabi, H., Keesstra, S., Ahmad, B. B., Bui, D. T. (2019). Uncertainties of prediction accuracy in shallow landslide modeling: Sample size and raster resolution. Catena, 178, 172–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Saini, T. K., Sharma, S. C. (2020). Recent advancements, review analysis, and extensions of the AODV with the illustration of the applied concept. Ad Hoc Networks, 103, 102148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Alameri, I. A., Komarkova, J. (2019). Comparative study and analysis of wireless mobile adhoc networks routing protocols. Proceedings of the International Masaryk conference for phd students and young researchers (pp. 1409-1418). Hradec Kralové: Magnanimitas. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jahir, Y., Atiquzzaman, M., Refai, H., Paranjothi, A., LoPresti, P. G. (2019). Routing protocols and architecture for disaster area network: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 82, 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, M., Yang, M., Wu, Q., Zheng, R., Zhu, J. (2018). Smart perception and autonomic optimization: A novel bio-inspired hybrid routing protocol for MANETs. Future generation computer systems, 81, 505–513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Alameri, I. A., Komarkova, J. (2020). A Multi-Parameter Comparative Study of MANET Routing Protocols. Proceedings of 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–6). Sevilla: IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang, D., Kim, H. S., Joo, C., Bahk, S. (2018). ORGMA: Reliable opportunistic routing with gradient forwarding for MANETs. Computer Networks, 131, 52–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bamhdi, A. M. (2020). Efficient dynamic-power AODV routing protocol based on node density. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 70, 103406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roy, A., Acharya, T., DasBit, S. (2018). Quality of service in delay tolerant networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 130, 121–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.