Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 06012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Claims
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219206012
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Berenguer, G., Shen, Z.J. (2020). Challenges and Strategies in Managing Nonprofit Operations: An Operations Management Perspective. M&som-manufacturing & service operations management, 22(5), 888-905. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rebetak, F., Bartosova, V. (2020). Non-profit organizations in the conditions of Slovakia. SHS Web of Conferences, 74, Art. No. 05020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shemyatikhina, L., Shipitsyna, K., Usheva, M. (2020). Marketing management of a non-profit organization. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 14(1), 19-29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nadanyiova, M. 2017. Neuromarketing - An opportunity or a threat? Communications: scientific letters of the University of Žilina, 19(4), 90-94. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauerova, R. (2018). Consumers´ decision-making in online grocery shopping: The impact of services and delivery conditions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(5), 1239-1247. [Google Scholar]
  6. Krizanova, A., Lăzăroiu, G., Gajanova, L., Kliestikova, J., Nadanyiova, M., Moravcikova, D. (2019). The Effectiveness of Marketing Communication and Importance of Its Evaluation in an Online Environment. Sustainability, 11(24), Art. No. 7016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kolarovszki, P., Kolarovszka, Z., Tengler, J. (2017). Electronic support by the multimedia applications in conjunction with education in the field of postal processes. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.). Inted2017: 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 5691-5697). Valencia: Spain. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pitsakis, K., Giachetti, C. (2020). Information-based imitation of university commercialization strategies: The role of technology transfer office autonomy, age, and membership into an association. Strategic Organization, 18(4), 573-616. [Google Scholar]
  9. Crotty, J., Ljubownikow, S. (2019). Restrictive Institutions and Critical Resources: Non-Profit Organisations and Volunteer Resources in the Russian Federation. Europe-Asia Studies, 72(1), 99-116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boros, J. (2001). Základy socialnej psychologie. Bratislava: IRIS. [Google Scholar]
  11. Klepek, M. (2017). Systematic Analysis of the Current Academic Research on Social Media Marketing. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64(s1), 15-27. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vellino, A., Alberts, I. (2016). Assisting the appraisal of e-mail records with automatic classification. Records Management Journal, 26(3), 293-313. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bracinikova, V., Matusinska, K. (2020). Brand Meaning for Consumers from Dissimilar Generations. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, 28(1), 29-42. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bauerova, R. (2019). Online grocery shopping acceptance: the impact on the perception of new technologies and loyalty in retailing. Central European Business Review, 8(3), 18-34. [Google Scholar]
  15. Omojokun, E., Adekoya, A., Eyob, E. (2007). A cost-effective approach for migrating enterprise electronic mail systems. In A. Tremante, F. Malpica, A. Oropeza, F. Welsch, J.V. Carrasquero & H.F. Su (Eds.). Imsci ’07: international multi-conference on society, cybernetics and informatics (pp. 320-324). Orlando: Florida. [Google Scholar]
  16. Klepek, M., Starzyczna, H. (2018). Marketing Communication Model for Social Networks. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(3), 500-520. [Google Scholar]
  17. Allison-Cassin, S. (2020). Bodies, Brains, and Machines: An Exploration of the Relationship between the Material and Affective States of Librarians and Information Systems. Library Trends, 68(3), 409-430. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vastikova, M., Matusinska, K., Vanek, J. (2011). Aspekty marketingové komunikace vysoké školy vzhledem k získání nových zákazníků. E+M Ekonomie a management, 3, 110-116. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bournaris, T. (2020). Evaluation of e-Government Web Portals: The Case of Agricultural e-Government Services in Greece. Agronomy-Basel, 10(7), 932. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mouna, A., Nedra, B., Khaireddine, M. (2020). International comparative evidence of e-government success and economic growth: technology adoption as an anti-corruption tool. Transforming Government- People Process and Policy, Early Access: June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., Nunez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fabryova, L. (2007). Informatizacia verejnej spravy. Informatizacia. Retreieved from: http://www.informatizacia.sk/egovernment/519s. [Google Scholar]
  23. Coupet, J., Broussard, P. (2020). Do Donors Respond to Nonprofit Performance? Evidence from Housing. Public performance & management review. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.