Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 06036
Number of page(s) 12
Section Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Claims
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Dong, A., & Li, H. (2005). Multimedia access platform for virtual learning environment. In 2005 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (pp. 6-pp). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  3. Blery, E., Batistatos, N., Papastratou, E., Perifanos, I., Remoundaki, G., & Retsina, M. (2009). Service quality and customer retention in mobile telephony. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(1), 27-37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caruana, R., & Chatzidakis, A. (2014). Consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Toward a multi-level, multi-agent conceptualization of the “other CSR”. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 577-592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chee, V. S. (2019). The Relationship of Service Quality, Customer. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy, 12. [Google Scholar]
  6. CHINDA, C. C. (2020). Service quality and customer loyalty in the telecommunication industry in lagos state, Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, J. M. (1939). Social Control Of Business. (2). Chicago: Macgraw Hill & Company Newyork & London. Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management journal, 16(2), 312-322. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dominici, G., & Guzzo, R. (2010). Customer satisfaction in the hotel industry: A case study from Sicily. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(2), 3-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghotbabadi, A. R., Feiz, S., & Baharun, R. (2015). Service quality measurements: a review. International Journal of Academic Research in business and social sciences, 5(2), 267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gul, R. (2014). The relationship between reputation, customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(3), 368-387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hapsari, R., Hussein, A. S., & Handrito, R. P. (2020). Being Fair to Customers: A Strategy in Enhancing Customer Engagement and Loyalty in the Indonesia Mobile Telecommunication Industry. Services Marketing Quarterly, 41(1), 49-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harazneh, I., Adaileh, M., Thbeitat, A., Afaneh, S., Khanfar, S., Harasis, A., & Elrehail, H. (2020). The impact of quality of services and satisfaction on customer loyalty: The moderate role of switching costs. Management Science Letters, 10(8), 1843-1856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Idris, A., Iftikhar, A., & ur Rehman, Z. (2019). Intelligent churn prediction for telecom using GP-AdaBoost learning and PSO undersampling. Cluster Computing, 22(3), 7241-7255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kreps, T. J. (1962). Measurement of the social performance of business. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 343(1), 20-31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar, A. (2017). Effect of service quality on customer loyalty and the mediating role of customer satisfaction: an empirical investigation for the telecom service industry. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 4(4), 159-166. [Google Scholar]
  17. Imbug, N., Ambad, S. N. A., & Bujang, I. (2018). The influence of customer experience on customer loyalty in telecommunication industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 103-116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moisescu, O. I. (2015). The impact of customers’ perception of CSR on corporate brand loyalty: The case of the Romanian mobile telecom industry. Central European Business Review, 4(2), 21-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing, 49(4), 41-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raf, M., & Syarif, A. (2020). Loyalty program and its influence on customer loyalty on mobile service with customer satisfaction as a mediating variable. Journal Of Business Studies And Management Review, 3(2), 39-43. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mohammed, S. S., & Shahin, O. (2020). Service Quality Perspectives in Telecommunication Sector: Trust and Loyalty Investigation. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 394-403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stanisavljević, M. (2017). Does customer loyalty depend on corporate social responsibility?. Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, 63(1), 38-46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123-135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ting, H., Tan, K. L., Lim, X. J., Cheah, J. H., Ting, Q. H., & Ting, H. B. (2020). What determines customers’ loyalty towards telecommunication service? Mediating roles of satisfaction and trust. International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, 11(3), 234-255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of management review, 10(4), 758-769. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yazid, A. S., Mkhiemer, I., & Mahmud, S. M. (2020). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Have a Role in Creating Customer. The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 51(2), 106-123). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.