Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 07013
Number of page(s) 10
Section Regions and Economic Resilience
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Schraff, D., Schimmelfennig, F. (2020). Does differentiated integration strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the EU?: evidence from the 2015 Danish opt-out referendum. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hug, S. (2003). Voices of Europe: citizens, referendums, and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
  3. Drumeva, E. (2008). Konstitutsionno parvo. Sofiya: Siela. [Google Scholar]
  4. Paksoy, H. M., Özçalici, M., Özbezek, B. D. (2020). Prediction of The Referendum Results According To People’s Attitude Towards The Local Government. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(22), 1293. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gherghina, S., Silagadze, N. (2020, October 31). Populists and Referendums in Europe: Dispelling the Myth. The Political Quarterly. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from : [Google Scholar]
  6. Aleksandrova, V. (2019). Byudzheten control. Sofiya: Propeler. [Google Scholar]
  7. Durana, P., Valaskova, K., Chlebikova, D., Krastev, V., Atanasova, I. (2020). Heads and Tails of Earnings Management: Quantitative Analysis in Emerging Countries. Risks, 8(2), 57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krastev, V., Koyundzhiyska-Davidkova, B., Atanasova, I. (2020). The impact of the corruption on the sustainable development of the businesses in South-West Bulgaria. In SHS Web of Conferences, 74, Art. No. 06015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Diskin, A., Eschet-Schwarz, A., Felsenthal, D.S. (2007). Homogeneity, heterogeneity and direct democracy: the case of Swiss referenda. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40, 334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Papadopoulos, Y. (2002). Connecting Minorities to the Swiss Federal System: A Frozen Conception of Representation and the Problem of “Requisite Variety”. The Journal of Federalism, 32(3), 47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Belov, M. (2009). Pryaka demokratsiya. Sofiya: Sibi. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsachevski, V. (2014). Shveitsariya: Demokratsiya na badeshteto. Sofiya: Iztok-Zapad. [Google Scholar]
  13. Quinlan, S., Stephard, M. & Paterson, L. (2015). Online discussion and the 2014 scottish independence referendum: flaming keyboards or forums for deliberation?. Electoral Studies, 38, 192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Aubert, J.-F. (2001). Le referendum en Europe: bilan et perspectives. Paris: L’Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
  15. Borstein, N., Lanz, B. (2008). Voting on the environment: price or ideology? Evidence from Swiss referendums. Ecological Economics, 67, 431. [Google Scholar]
  16. Closa, C. (2007). Why convene referendums? Explaining choices in EU constitutional politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8), Art. No. 1313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Le Duc, L. (2005). Saving the proud or voting for Europe? Expectations for referendums on the constitution and the Euro. Journal of Elections. Public Opinion and Parties, 15(2), 170. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jerzak, Connor T. (2014). The EU’ democratic deficit and repeated referendums in Ireland. International Journal of Politics Culture and Society, 27, 367-388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Baum, M. A., Freire, A. (2001). Political parties, cleavage structures and referendum voting: electoral behavior in the Portuguese regionalization referendum of 1998. South European Society and Politics, 6(1), 1-26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leininger, A., Heyne, L. (2017). How representative are referendums? Evidence from 20 years of Swiss referendums. Electoral Studies, 48, 84-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sisk, T. D. (2001). Democracy At The Local Level. The International IDEA Handbook on Participation, Representation, Conflict Management, and Governance. Halmstad: Bulls Tryckeri. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krasteva, N. (2009). Klod A. Helvetsii za nravstveno-pravnoto vazpitanie. Pedagogika, 1-2, 141. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.