Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 08020
Number of page(s) 7
Section Economic Sustainability
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Marx, A., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2014). The origins, development, and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: the first 25 years. European Political Science Review: EPSR, 6(1), 115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rihoux, B et al. (2013). From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA application in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Politicaly Research Quartely, 55(1), 175-184. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ragin, C., & Zaret, D. (1983). Theory and method in comparative research: Two strategies. Social forces, 61(3), 731-754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Simister, N., Scholz, V. (2017). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Intrac. [Google Scholar]
  5. Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255-282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: Agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 376-396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397-418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kouba, K. (2012). Kvalitativní srovnávací analýza (QCA) a konfigurativní metody v politologii. Úvod do studia politiky. Slon, 468-507. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kahwati, L., Jacobs, S., Kane, H., Lewis, M., Viswanathan, M., & Golin, C. E. (2016). Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention. Systematic reviews, 5(1), 82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. George, A., Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(2), 391-408 [Google Scholar]
  11. Skaaning, S. E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 391-408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vassinen, A. (2012). Configurational explanation of marketing outcomes. Aalto University Schoold of Economics. [Google Scholar]
  13. Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Berg-Schlosser, D. (2008). Comparative research design: case and variable selection. Configurational Comparative Methods. SAGE Publications [Google Scholar]
  15. Woodside, A. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Munck, G. L. (2004). Tools for qualitative research. Rethinking social inquiry. Diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of management journal, 54(2), 393-420.. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ragin, C. C. (2009). Reflections on casing and case-oriented research. The Sage handbook of case-based methods. 522-534. [Google Scholar]
  19. Woodside, A. G., & Zhang, M. (2012). Identifying x-consumers using causal recipes:“Whales” and “jumbo shrimps” casino gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(1), 13-26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.