EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 97 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 97 (2021) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 97, 2021
International Conference “Technological Educational Vision” (TEDUVIS 2020)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219701003
Published online 08 February 2021
  1. E. Scharfenaker, J. Yang, Maximum entropy economics. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS. 229 (9) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Gao, Rethinking the Formalism-Substantivism Debate in Social Science: A Perspective from Recent Developments in Economic Methodology. MODERN CHINA (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Bhide, Making economics more useful: how technological eclecticism could help. APPLIED ECONOMICS. 52 (26) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Pogatsa, How Does the Methodology of Neoclassical Economics Eliminate the Question of Fairness? ECONOMIC OBJECTS AND THE OBJECTS OF ECONOMICS. Virtues and Economics. 3 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Lin, New structural economics: the third generation of development economics. ASIAN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES. 9 (3) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Sethi, Rationalizing Choice: A Review Essay on Peter Leeson’s WTF?! : An Economic Tour of the Weird. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE. 57 (4) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Bowden, Empiricism, epistemology and modern postmodernism: a critique. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT. 14 (4) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Fine, Post-truth: an alumni economist’s perspective. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Kesting, Rigor in Economics means Pluralism. FORUM FOR SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 48 (4) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Huhn, Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science: Economics as Moral Imagination. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. 155 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Kapeliushnikov, Who Is Homo Oeconomicus? EKONOMICHESKAYA POLITIKA. 15 (1) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Murphy, Economics is whatever the comparative advantage of economists is: a comment on Leeson. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS. 16 (4) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Menard, Please, open the windows! JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS. 16 (4) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Mihai, I. Novo-Corti, A new insight into the methodology of cultural economics. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Alghalith, New methods of modeling and estimating preferences. STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE. 36 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Brisset, D. Jullien, The model (also) in the world: extending the sociological theory of fields to economic models. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY. 27 (2) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Hernandez, The fundamental theoretical convergence between the contributions from economists of the Neoclassical School and the institutionalisers of sociology. CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA-SPAIN. 41 (115) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. O. Petinova, “Homo Economicus” Through the Lens of Metaphysics of Economics. PHILOSOPHY AND COSMOLOGY-FILOSOFIYA I KOSMOLOGIYA. 21(2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Wagner-Tsukamoto, In search of ethics: from Carroll to integrative CSR economics. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL. 15 (4) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Sethi, Rationalizing Choice: A Review Essay on Peter Leeson’s WTF?! : An Economic Tour of the Weird. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE. 57 (4) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Haldane, A. Turrell, Drawing on different disciplines: macroeconomic agent-based models. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS. 29 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Haldane, A. Turrell, An interdisciplinary model for macroeconomics. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY. 34 (1-2) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Angner, We’re all behavioral economists now. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY. 26 (3) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Sindzingre, CAUSALITY, MODELLING, SOCIAL NORMS: AMONG THE THEORETICAL CORES OF ‘HETERODOX’ ECONOMICS? JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES. 10 (4) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Boda, T. Faran, Paradigm Found? Immanent Critique to Tackle Interdisciplinarity and Normativity in Science for Sustainable Development. SUSTAINABILITY. 10 (10) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Pieniaze, Austrian and Mainstream Economics: How Do They Differ? EKONOMISTA. 2 [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Trcek, COMPUTATIONAL TRUST MANAGEMENT IN ECONOMICS PHENOMENA RESEARCH. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY. 24 (6) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Kondrashov, THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ORDER AND ECONOMISTS. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES. 10 (1) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Wilkin, A. Kargol-Wasiluk, M. Zalesko, INSTITUTIONAL EQUILIBRIUM: THE FOUNDATION OF ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM. EKONOMISTA. 6 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Cotsomitis, Is the learning economy a viable concept for understanding the modern economy? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 45 (3) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Keen, KORNAI AND ANTI-EQUILIBRIUM. ACTA OECONOMICA. 68 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  32. Tumanyan, Y., Ishchenko-Padukova, O., Movchan, I. (2018) GEO-ECONOMICS IN INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH SYSTEM. TERRA ECONOMICUS. 16 (4) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Garcia, L. Ivarola, M. Szybisz, The paradigm of complexity in economics beyond laws and linear causality. CINTA DE MOEBIO. 61(2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. J.-M. Servet, B. Tinel, The behavioral and neoliberal foundations of randomizations. STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE. 29 (3) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  35. D.W. Thomas, M.D. Thomas, Behavioral symmetry, rent seeking, and the Republic of Science. PUBLIC CHOICE. 183 (3-4) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Saltelli, L. Benini, S. Funtowicz, M. Kaiser, E. Reinert, J.P. van der Sluijs, The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY. 106 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  37. I.H. Kvangraven, Impoverished economics? A critical assessment of the new gold standard. WORLD DEVELOPMENT. 127 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Johnson, Toward a cognitive science of markets: economic agents as sense-makers. ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL. 13 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Vilke, Towards holistic understanding of socially responsible provision of public goods: conceptual foundations. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL. 15 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Boegenhold, History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future. INTERNATIONAL ADVANCES IN ECONOMIC RESEARCH. 26 (1) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Aydin, I. Ozer-Imer, At the Crossroads of History and Theory: Weber, Schumpeter and Economic Sociology. PANOECONOMICUS. 66 (4) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Frolov, EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS AT THE PEAK AND IN CRISIS: PROSPECTS FOR THE NEW PARADIGM. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES. 12 (1) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  43. Y. Kotlyarevsky, A. Melnychenko, O. Ivanytska, E. Semenyuk, S. Kniaziev, O. Melnikov, NEW ECONOMY: EVOLUTION OF FORMS AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION. 16 (1) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  44. F. Glauner, Redefining economics: why shared value is not enough. COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW. 29 (5) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  45. B. Silva-Rego, A. Figueira, New institutional economics: contributions to international business studies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS. 14 (5) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  46. Q. Couix, Natural resources in the theory of production: the Georgescu-Roegen/Daly versus Solow/Stiglitz controversy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT. 26 (6) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  47. I. Dzeraviaha, Mainstream economics toolkit within the ecological economics framework. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS. 148 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Kovalevsky, A. Falaleev, E. Gasanov, M. Konovalova, N. Reimer, On the Issues of the Structural Methodology of Sustainable Development. IVTH INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE MINING SYMPOSIUM. E3S Web of Conferences. 105 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  49. B. Fine, Economics and Interdisciplinarity: One Step Forward, N Steps Back? REVISTA CRITICA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS. 119 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Jhun, What’s the Point of Ceteris Paribus? or, How to Understand Supply and Demand Curves. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. 85 (2) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  51. R. Kapeliushnikov, On current state of economics: Subjective semi-sociological observations. VOPROSY EKONOMIKI.5 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  52. J. Edwards, Y. Giraud, C. Schinckus, A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics? JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY. 25 (4) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  53. G. Soldatos, E. Varelas, Emotional intelligence in a neoclassical framework and the nature of capitalism. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES. 46 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  54. C. Graebner, Formal Approaches to Socio-economic Analysis-Past and Perspectives. FORUM FOR SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 47 (1) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  55. G. Racko, The Values of Economics. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. 154 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  56. S. Puehringer, L. Baeuerle, What economics education is missing: the real world. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 46 (8) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  57. T. Kopczewski, I. Okhrimenko, Can homo economicus be an altruist? A classroom experimental method. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS EDUCATION. 32 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  58. C. Farias, F. Balardini, Teaching social economics Bringing the real world into the classroom and taking the classroom into the real world. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 46 (8) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  59. I. Rafikov, E. Akhmetova, Scarcity in the age of abundance: paradox and remedies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS. 35 (1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  60. P. Manning, Behavioural economics and social economics: opportunities for an expanded curriculum. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 46 (8) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  61. J. Wight, Antecedents to the crisis: Mandeville, Smith, and Keynes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS. 46 (8) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  62. A. Vouldis, Cornelius Castoriadis on the Scope and Content of Neoclassical and Marxian Economics. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES. 52 (3) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  63. O. Mamedov, AN “ELEMENTARY PARTICLE” OF THE ECONOMY. TERRA ECONOMICUS. 16 (3) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  64. Mamedov O. Makroekonomika Odnogo nedostatochno! // Terra economus. 2017. Tom 15, Vypusk 4. Str. 6-21 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mamedov O. «Tret’ya zhizn’» politicheskoy ekonomii, rabotayushchaya ... // Terra economus. 2015. Tom 13. Tom. 2. Str. 143-147 [Google Scholar]
  66. R. Westra, Roy Bhaskar’s Critical Realism and the Social Science of Marxian Economics. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS. 51 (3) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  67. A. Buzgalin, “Capital” as the key to solving modern economic problems (Offline addition to the discussion on the revival of a special seminar on Karl Marx’s “Capital”). VOPROSY EKONOMIKI. 6 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  68. M. Pacifico, Dialetical-historical materialism: genesis and meanings of the method. ARGUMENTOS-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA. 21 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  69. A. M. Siqueira, CRITICAL REALISM AND THE ONTOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF ECONOMICS METHODOLOGY. EPISTEMOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-EPISTEMOLOGIYA I FILOSOFIYA NAUKI. 55 (3) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  70. E. Cheng, PRINCIPLES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR A DIVERSIFIED RENEWAL IN THE SYSTEM OF MODERN POLITICAL ECONOMY. TERRA ECONOMICUS. 16 (4) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  71. Vsemirnaya istoriya ekonomicheskoy mysli: v 6 t.- T.3.-M.: Mysl’, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  72. Delenyan A.A. Vozmozhen li sintez marksizma i marzhinalizma?// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodava-niya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.- M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S. 106-114 [Google Scholar]
  73. Buzgalin A.V. Klassicheskaya politekonomiya: vozvrashcheniye v universitety// Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii. 2015. T.193. N° 4. S.107-140 [Google Scholar]
  74. Korobeynikov M.A. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya v protsesse radikal’nykh peremen: vozvrashcheniye i osmysleniye sud’by politicheskoy eko-nomii// nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii. 2015. T.193. N° S.171-179 [Google Scholar]
  75. Braginskiy S.V., Pevzner YA.A. Politicheskaya ekonomiya: diskussionnyye problemy, puti obnovleniya. M.: Mysl’, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  76. Radayev V.V. Klassika i neoklassika v politicheskoy ekonomii// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodava-niya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.- M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.76-92 [Google Scholar]
  77. Moskovskiy A.I. O sinteze ekonomicheskoy teorii K.Marksa i Ekonomiks// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.- M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.92=98 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rozanova N.M. «Kapital» K.Marksa i Ekonomiks: substituty ili komplementy?// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.-M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.98-105 [Google Scholar]
  79. Khubiyev K.A. K sintezu osnovnykh napravleniy ekonomicheskoy teorii// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, pre-podavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.- M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S. 114-122 [Google Scholar]
  80. Agapova T.A. Preodolet’ razryv mezhdu geneticheskoy i funktsional’noy storonami ekonomicheskoy teorii// «Kapital» i Ekono-miks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.-M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.124-132 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sorokin A.V. Sootnosheniye osnovnykh kategoriy ekonomicheskoy teorii K.Marksa i kategoriy Ekonomiks// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.-M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.189-220 [Google Scholar]
  82. Chekanskaya A.N. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya kak uchebnaya distsiplina// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepoda-vaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.- M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.183-186 [Google Scholar]
  83. Taranukha YU.V. Integratsiya ili eklektika?// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.-M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.122-122 [Google Scholar]
  84. Grandberg Z.A. Sokhranit’ prepodavaniye «Kapitala» K.Marksa// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepoda-vaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.- M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.175 [Google Scholar]
  85. Frolov V.A. Politicheskaya ekonomiya - nauka o proizvodstvennykh otnosheniyakh// «Kapital» i Ekonomiks. Voprosy metodologii, teorii, prepodavaniya/ Pod red. V.N.Cherkovtsa.-M.: Ekonomicheskiy fakul’tet, TEIS, 1998. S.176-176 [Google Scholar]
  86. Abalkin L. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya na puti k novoy paradigme// Voprosy ekonomiki. 1993 . X 1. [Google Scholar]
  87. Politicheskaya ekonomiya: mesto v sisteme ekonomicheskikh nauk// Filosofiya khozyaystva. 2011. X 2(74). S. 265-296 [Google Scholar]
  88. Yefimov V.M. Ekonomicheskaya nauka pod voprosom: drugaya metodologiya, istoriya i issledovatel’skaya praktika. M. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  89. Politicheskaya ekonomiya // Pod red. V. V. Radayev. M .: Moskovskoye izdatel’stvo. OON-TA, 1992 [Google Scholar]
  90. Politicheskaya ekonomika: uchebnoye posobiye dlya uchiteley // Pod red. A. V. Sidorovicha, F.M. Volkova. M .: Izd-vo Mosk. OON-TA, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  91. Uchebnik po osnovam ekonomicheskoy teorii // Pod redaktsiyey V.D. Kamayeva i dr .: Izd-vo Vlados, MGTU im. Baumana, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  92. Seligmen B. Osnovnyye techeniya sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy mysli. - M .: Progress, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  93. Bell D. Gryadushcheye postindustrial’noye obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya. - M .: Akademiya, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  94. Soros Dzh. KH. Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. - Moskva, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  95. Privalov N.G., Privalova S.G. Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya. Sankt- Peterburg: OOO «INSEI-otsenka», 2019. [Google Scholar]
  96. Privalov N.G., Ekonomika nekommercheskogo sektora: uchebnik / N. G. Privalov.- 2- ye izd., Perepechatka. i dobavit’. - M .: INFRA-M, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  97. Parsons T. O strukture sotsial’nykh deystviy. M .: Akademicheskiy proyekt, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  98. Sorokin P. Sotsial’naya i kul’turnaya dinamika/ P. Sorokin.- SPb.: Izd-vo Russkogo khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ivanitskiy V.P., Privalov N.G. Upravleniye strategicheskimi resursami kak funktsiya rossiyskogo gosudarstva// Ekonomika regio-na. 2016. T.12 (vyp.1). S.296-302 [Google Scholar]
  100. Privalov N.G., Semin A.N., Shaymardanov N.Z., Salchinskiy V.I., Stakheyeva L.M., Yusupov M.L. Sotsial’noye partnerstvo: ot rynka truda k grazhdanskomu obshchestvu. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural.GSKHA, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  101. Privalov N.G. Ekonomika nekommercheskogo sektora. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural.GSKHA, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  102. Privalov N.G. Ekonomicheskiye osnovy grazhdanskogo obshchestva: k novoy paradigme mirovogo razvitiya. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGEU, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  103. Privalov N.G. Tretiy put’ Rossii: novaya nadezhda v XXI veke. Yekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Urala, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  104. Privalov N.G. Ekonomika nekommercheskogo sektora. Yekaterinburg - M .: Ural’skiy izdatel’skiy dom - Bol’shaya Medveditsa, 2009. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.