Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 100, 2021
IV International Scientific Congress “Society of Ambient Intelligence – 2021” (ISCSAI 2021)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Digitization of Society in National Legal Systems
Published online 25 March 2021
  1. Law of Ukraine N 2453-VI of July, 07, 2010, «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges», https://zakon.rada., [Google Scholar]
  2. Law of Ukraine N°3529-VI of June, 06, 2011, «On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine in Connection with the Ratification of the Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters», [Google Scholar]
  3. Law of Ukraine N 1001-05 of December, 31, 1960, «Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, [Google Scholar]
  4. Law of Ukraine N 4651-VI of April, 13, 2012, «Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine», [Google Scholar]
  5. Law of Ukraine N 5041 -VI of July, 04, 2012, «On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Participation in a Court Session by Videoconference», [Google Scholar]
  6. Decree of the President of Ukraine N 276/2015 of May, 20, 2015, «Strategy for reforming the judiciary, the judiciary and related legal institutions for 2015-2020», ntl509894126567793 [Google Scholar]
  7. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [Google Scholar]
  8. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Adopted and opened for signature and ratification by General Assembly resolution 2106 (XX) of 21 December 1965 entry into force 4 January 1969, in accordance with Article 19 [Google Scholar]
  9. Convention on the Rights of the Child, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989, Entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49 [Google Scholar]
  10. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (“The Beijing Rules”) Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/33 of 29 November 1985, rest/beijingrules.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Recommendation No. R (81) 7. Of The Committee Of Ministers To Member States. On Measures Facilitating Access To Justice. (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 May 1981 at its 68th Session), [Google Scholar]
  12. Recommendation No. R (84) 5 Of The Committee Of Ministers To Member States On The Principles Of Civil Procedure Designed To Improve The Functioning Of Justice1 (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 February 1984 at the 367th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) 016804e19b1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Recommendation No. R (95) 13 Of The Committee Of Ministers To Member States Concerning Problems Of Criminal Procedural Law Connected With Information Technology (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on at the 543rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies), [Google Scholar]
  14. Opinion No. (2011) 14 of the Consultative Council Of European Judges «Justice and information technologies (IT)» Adopted by the CCJE at its 12th plenary meeting (Strasbourg, 7-9 November 2011), [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Yu. Zub, Videoconference as a means of simplification of civil proceedings, Bulletin of VN Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Right, 17, (2014), [Google Scholar]
  16. Sir Brahmaiah Maroju. Video Conferencing in Judicial Proceedings - An Innovative Practice // Centre for Innovations in Public Systems, of May, 2020, [Google Scholar]
  17. Miklos Kengyel; Zoltan Nemessanyi. Electronic technology and civil procedure: new paths to justice from around the world, 329, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. Syzonenko A. Video communication as a means of investigative actions outside Ukraine, Law of Ukraine. 3, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  19. Smirnov MI Features of mutual legal assistance in criminal cases using the method of videoconferencing: dis…PhD. 268, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  20. Pashkovsky, MI Videoconference in criminal proceedings, Legal life of modern Ukraine: International scientific conference of teaching and graduate students (Odessa, May, 21-22, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  21. Bortun M. Current issues of interrogation by video conference, Bulletin of the National Academy of Prosecutors of Ukraine, 1, 34, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Chernychenko I. The concept and procedural-legal essence of videoconference in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine, Visnyk of Lviv National University. The series is legal, 59, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. Bogunov V. Videoconferencing will allow participants to save time and money, Law and Business, 35, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  24. Garievskaya MB Videoconference in civil proceedings, Private law and entrepreneurship, 14, (2015);. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ozernyuk GV Legal regulation of court hearings by videoconference under the laws of the European Union, 1, (2020), [Google Scholar]
  26. Kravtsova T., Kornienko M. Court hearings by videoconference, Ukrainian lawyer, 4–5, (2020). https://www.asterslaw. com/ru/press_center/publica tions/court_hearings_via_vidvideoconferen_in_ukraine/ [Google Scholar]
  27. Law of Ukraine X 852-IV of May, 22, 2003, «About electronic digital signature», [Google Scholar]
  28. Law of Ukraine X 1798-XII of November 6, 1991, «Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine», [Google Scholar]
  29. Law of Ukraine X 1618-IV of March, 18, 2004, «Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine», [Google Scholar]
  30. Law of Ukraine X 2747-IV of July, 6, 2005, «Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine», [Google Scholar]
  31. Regulation (Eu) No 910/2014 Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, idas_regulation.pdf [Google Scholar]
  32. Law of Ukraine X 2155-VIII of October, 05, 2017, «About electronic trust services», https://zakon.rada. [Google Scholar]
  33. Law of Ukraine X 5492-VI of November, 20, 2012, «About the Unified State Demographic Register and documents confirming the citizenship of Ukraine, identity or special status», [Google Scholar]
  34. Order of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine X 196 of April, 23, 2020, «About modification of the Order of work with technical means of videoconferencing during court session in administrative, civil and economic processes with participation of the parties out of court premises», [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.