Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2021
IX Baltic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium” 2020
Article Number 02015
Number of page(s) 5
Section Fighting Crime: Criminal Law Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110802015
Published online 31 May 2021
  1. A. Barak, Sudeiskoe usmotrenie [Judicial discretion] (Norma, Moscow, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.I. Rarog, Yu.V. Gracheva, State and Law 11, 93-100 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  3. V.G. Antropov, Pravoprimenitelnoe usmotrenie: ponyatie i formirovanie: logikosemanticheskii aspect [Law-enforcement discretion: notion and formation: logical and semantic aspect]. Abstract of a PhD thesis in Legal Science (Volgograd Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Volgograd, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Heath, Administrative discretion and the rule of law, in The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State, 254-299 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509616.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Neimanis, Administrative Law and Process, 4(27), 41-46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17721//2227-796X.2019.4.04 [Google Scholar]
  6. E.S. Azarova, Legal Concept, 18(2), 69-73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2019.2.10 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Szczekocki, Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 29(3), 149-162 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.3.149-162 [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu.V. Onosov, Siberian Law Review, 17(1), 11-16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-11-16 [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Leszczyński, Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 29(3), 39-54 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.3.39-54 [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Biernat, Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 29(3), 67-85 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.3.67-85 [Google Scholar]
  11. K.C. Davis, Discretionary justice: a preliminary inquiry (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, 1969) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Lempert, Law Soc. Rev. 24(2), 321-322 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/3053681 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Galanter, Adjudication, litigation and related phenomena, in L. Lipson and S. Wheller (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences, 151-258 (Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1986). https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448833.7 [Google Scholar]
  14. C.E. Schneider, Discretion and rules: a lawyer’s view, in K. Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion, 47-88 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  15. A.C. Hutchinson, J.N. Wakefield, Oxf. J. Leg. Stud. 2(1), 86-110 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/2.1.86 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Frank, Courts on trial (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.