Open Access
Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2021
IX Baltic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium” 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04004 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110804004 | |
Published online | 31 May 2021 |
- S.A. Zuev, Criminal Law, 6, 84-86 (2007) [Google Scholar]
- F. Enikö, Revue internationale de droit pénal, 77(1/2), 313-322 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.771.0313 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Epihin, A. Mishin, Kazan University Law Review, 1, 29-46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2018-3-1-29-46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L.V. Brusnitsyn, Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sodeistvuiushchikh ugolovnomu pravosudiiu: mirovoi opyt i razvitie rossiiskogo zakonodatelstva (protsessualnoe issledovanie) [Security of persons assisting in criminal justice: world experience and development of Russian legislation (procedural study)] (Yurlitinform, Moscow, 2010) [Google Scholar]
- D.S. Sokolov, Nekotorye voprosy gosudarstvennoi zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Some issues of state protection of participants of criminal proceedings], in Teoriia i praktika rassledovaniia prestuplenii. Materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Theory and practice of crime investigation. Materials of the Eighth International Scientific-Practical Conference], 302-306 (Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Krasnodar, 2020) [Google Scholar]
- D. Bazarova, Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabilitation 24(2), 287-294 (2020). https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i2/pr200333 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Bhuckory, Commonwealth Law Bulletin 39(1), 43-48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2012.751198 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Dandurand, K. Farr, A review of selected witness protection programs (Public Safety Canada, Ottawa, 2010) [Google Scholar]
- D.T. Dimovski, J.M. Papovic-Miladinovic, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad 51(1), 137-152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns51-14142 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F.F. Zaripov, Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 29(6), 823829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9593-2019-29-6-823-829 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Dmitrieva, Tomsk State University Journal, 396, 111-115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/396/20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O.V. Ilchenko, A.V. Benko, Comparative-Analytical Law, 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0390/2019.5.94 [Google Scholar]
- K.A. Krasnova, N.V. Ivlieva, Police and Investigative Activity, 2, 72-86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-7810.2015.2.15457 [Google Scholar]
- T.B. Ramazanov, R.O. Radzhabov, Law Herald of Dagestan State University, 29(1), 128-132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21779/2224-0241-2019-29-1-128-132 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T.B. Ramazanov, R.O. Radzhabov, Law Herald of Dagestan State University, 30(2), 146-150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21779/2224-0241-2019-30-2-146-150 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V.A. Panteleev, Protsessualnyi poriadok deistvii organov i dolzhnostnykh lits, obespechivaiushchikh bezopasnost uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (na primere MVD Rossii) [Procedural order of actions of bodies and officials providing safety of participants of criminal legal proceedings (on the example of the MIA of Russia)], in Pravo: istoriia, teoriia, praktika: materialy IV mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (g. Sankt-Peterburg, iiul 2016 g.) [Law: history, theory, practice: proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific Conference (St. Petersburg, July 2016)], 94-96 (Svoe izdatelstvo, Saint Petersburg, 2016) [Google Scholar]
- D.S. Lanshakov, Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 30(1), 99104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9593-2020-30-1-99-104 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.