EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 108 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 108 (2021) 04007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2021
IX Baltic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium” 2020
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110804007
Published online 31 May 2021
  1. B.Ya. Gavrilov, Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii [Modern Criminal Policy in Russia] (Moscow, Prospect, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  2. D.B. Gavrilov, Vozvrashchenie ugolovnogo dela dlya proizvodstva dopolnitelnogo rassledovaniya i ustraneniya prepyatstvii ego rassmotreniya sudom [Return of a criminal case for supplementary investigation and removal of obstacles to its consideration by court], PhD thesis (Moscow, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. Statisticheskie dannye o rezultatakh sledstvennoi raboty po forme 1-E za 1999, 2006– 2019 gg. [Statistical data on results of investigative work according to form 1-E for the years 1999, 2006-2019] (Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.05.2007 g. № 6-P “Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii statei 237, 413 i 418 Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom prezidiuma Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda” [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 6-P as of 16.05.2007 “On constitutional review of the provisions of Articles 237, 413 and 418 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of the Presidium of Kurgan Regional Court”], Corpus of Legislative Acts of the RF, 22, 2688 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 2 iyulya 2013 g. № 16-P “Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chasti pervoi stati 237 UPK RF v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B. T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda” [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 16-P as of July 2, 2013 “On constitutional review of the provisions of part one of Article 237 of the CCP RF in connection with the complaint of B.T. Gadaev, citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan, and the request from Kurgan Regional Court”], Corpus of Legislative Acts of the RF, 28, 3881 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. O.B. Lisafieva, Vozvrashchenie ugolovnogo dela prokuroru v sisteme ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii [Return of a criminal case to the prosecutor in the Russian criminal justice system], PhD thesis (Nizhnii Novgorod, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  7. T.N. Dolgikh, The Jud. and Crim. Process, 3, 97-101 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. T.K. Ryabinina, Deyatelnost suda po naznacheniyu i podgotovke ugolovnogo dela k sudebnomu zasedaniyu v mekhanizme realizatsii sudebnoi vlasti [Court Activities Aimed at Assignment and Preparation of a Criminal Case for Litigation as Part of the Mechanism of Exercise of Judicial Authority] (Jurlitinform, Moscow, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. I.A. Lupin, Vozvrashchenie ugolovnykh del na dopolnitelnoe rassledovanie v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii [Return of criminal cases for supplementary investigation in the criminal process of Russia], PhD thesis (Moscow, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  10. O.P. Zaeva, Society and Law, 61(3), 121-124 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. V.S. Balakshin, Bul. Udmurt Univ. 28(1), 81-88 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. V.L. Grigoryan, State and Law 8, 53-61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013207690006242-8 [Google Scholar]
  13. T.K. Ryabinina, Rus. J. Crim. 14(3), 512-526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(3).512-526 [Google Scholar]
  14. A.A. Trisheva, Vozvrashchenie sudom ugolovnogo dela prokuroru: genezis, sovremennoe sostoyanie, puti sovershenstvovaniya [Return of a criminal case to the prosecutor by the court: genesis, current state of affairs, ways of improvement], PhD thesis (Moscow, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. K.V. Muravyov, B.B. Bulatov, Bul. East Sib. Inst. Min. of Internal Aff. Rus. 87(4), 102-111 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. A.O. Mashovets, Bul. Krasnodar Univ. Min. of Internal Aff. Rus. 36(2), 93-96 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. S.V. Burmagin, Rus. Justice 1-2, 59-73 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  18. L.L. Abramova, N.G. Loginova, O.V. Meremyanina, M.V. Monid. Tipichnye oshibki, dopuskaemye pri proizvodstve predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya, vlekushchie vozvrashchenie sudei (sudom) ugolovnogo dela v dosudebnoe proizvodstvo analiticheskii obzor [Basic errors made during the preliminary investigation, entailing return of a criminal case by the judge (the court) for pre-trial proceedings – analytical review] (Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Krasnoyarsk, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. T.V. Cheremisina, Crim. Procedure 8, 54-59 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. T.V. Kuryakhova, Legislation and Pract. 2, 46-49 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Hungerford-Welch, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing (Routledge, London, New York, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Sheehan, D. Dickson, A. Vannet, F. Crowe, Criminal procedure (Reed Elsevier, Edinburgh, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  23. A.N. Brown, Criminal evidence and procedure. An Introduction Avizandum Publishing Ltd., (Edinburgh, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Tonini, Manuale di procedura penale (Milano, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Conz, L. Levita, Codice di procedura penale. Annotato con la giurisprudenza (Roma, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. V. Catena, V. Domínguez, Derecho proceso penalties (Valencia, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Martínez, Derecho proceso penal (Madrid, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Sendra, Manual de derecho proceso penal (Madrid, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  29. M. López, Derecho proceso penal (Valencia, 2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.