Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2021
IX Baltic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium” 2020
Article Number 04011
Number of page(s) 7
Section Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110804011
Published online 31 May 2021
  1. M.S. Kolosovich, Protsessualnye sredstva obespecheniya glasnosti i tainy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: kontseptualnye osnovy [Procedural means for securing transparency and confidentiality of criminal proceedings: conceptual framework]. Doctoral thesis (Volgograd, 2019). [Online] Available: https://xn--80ad.xn--b1aew.xn-p1ai/Nauka/Dissovety/Objavlenija_o_zashhite [Google Scholar]
  2. O.B. Dronova, B.P. Smagorinsky, V.B. Yastrebov, Stud. in Sys., Decision and Contr. 181, 121-131 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. A.P. Alekseeva, Crim. J. Baikal National Univ. of Ec. and Law 1, 77-83 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Golovnenkov and N. Spitsa, Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Federativnoi Respubliki Germaniya. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii i perevod teksta zakona [Code of Criminal Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany. Scientific and practical commentary and law text translation] (Universitätsverlag Potsdam, Potsdam, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  5. O.M. Butler, The Cambridge Law J. 75(3), 452-455 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Thierer, Harvard J. of Law and Pub. Policy 36(2), 409-457 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. R.A. Epstein, Harvard J. of Law and Pub. Policy 41(1), 95-117 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. R.D. Richards, Harvard J. of Law and Pub. Policy 36(2), 519-548 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Goitein, Georgetown Law 55(1), 105-125 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Chao, C. Durso, I. Farrell, C. Robertson, California Law Rev. 106(2), 263-324 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Hufnagel, Global Crime 18(3), 218-236 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. M.B. Sedgewick, California Law Rev. 105(5), 1513-1542 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Grunwald and J. Fagan, California Law Rev. 107(2) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. R.M. Bloom and W.T. Clark, J. Crim. L. & Criminology 106(2), 167-202 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. D.A. Sklansky, California Law Rev. 102(5), 1069-1122 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Hu, Georgetown Law 55(1), 127-153 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. P.S. Menell, California Law Rev. 105(1), 1-63 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. K.A. Mennemeier, J. Crim. L. & Criminology 107(3), 443-492 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. O. Kavran. J. of Int. Crim. Justice 15(5), 953-983 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqx056 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.