EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 118 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 118 (2021) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 118, 2021
RUDN Conference on Legal Theory, Methodology and Regulatory Practice (RUDN LTMRP Conference 2021)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Modern Trends in Regulatory Practice Development: Public Law
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111803003
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. V.P. Konyakhin, Theoretical foundations for the construction of General Provisions of the Russian criminal law [Teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya Obshchei chasti rossiiskogo ugolovnogo prava] (Yurid Center Press, Saint Petersburg, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.I. Rarog, Lex Rus., 11(120), 46-49 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2016.120.11.046-060 [Google Scholar]
  3. E.A. Smogol, Devel. Tends in Sci. and Edu. 29-1, 15-20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-31-08-2017-04 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.Á.F. Cruz, Estudios Constitucionales, 12(2), 187-238 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002014000200007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Kosar, L. Vyhnanek, The Constitutional Court of Czechia. The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, in Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions III, 119-179 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. E.P. Parera, A.P. Pujolràs, Revista de Llengua i Dret, 70, 221-233 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.2436/rld.i70.2018.3240 [Google Scholar]
  7. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 27 fevralya 2020 g. № 10-P “Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti stati 324 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanki N.M. Demenshinoi” [Resolution of the RF Constitutional Court dated February 27, 2020 No. 10-P “With regard to the case on verification of the constitutional nature of article 324 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of N.M. Demenshina”] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/73579193/ [Google Scholar]
  8. D.V. Lorentz, Rus. J. Crim. 11, 337-349 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2017.11 (2) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2015 № 22-P “Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya stati 226.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan Respubliki Kazakhstan O.E. Nedashkovskogo i S.P. Yakovleva” [Resolution of the RF Constitutional Court dated July 16, 2015 No. 22-P “With regard to the case on verification of the constitutional nature of provision of article 226.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaints of the citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan, O.E. Nedashkovsky and S.P. Yakovlev”] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_183260/ [Google Scholar]
  10. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 10.07.2003 № 270-O “Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zaprosa Kurganskogo gorodskogo suda Kurganskoi oblasti o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti pervoi stati 3, stati 10 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i punkta 13 stati 397 Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [Ruling of the RF Constitutional Court of 10.07.2003 No. 270-O “On refusal to accept the request of Kurgan City Court of Kurgan Region on verification of the constitutional nature of part one of Article 3, of Article 10 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and clause 13 of Article 397 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure”] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://legalacts.ru/doc/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-10072003-n-270-o-ob/ [Google Scholar]
  11. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.06.2018 № 23-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 1 stati 1.7 i chasti 4 stati 4.5 Kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, punkta 4 stati 1 Federalnogo zakona “O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovanii i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti” i punkta 4 stati 1 Federalnogo zakona “O vnesenii izmenenii v otdelnye zakonodatelnye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federalnogo zakona “O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovanii i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti” v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan A.I. Zalyautdinova, N.Ya. Ismagilova i O.V. Cherednyak” [Resolution of the RF Constitutional Court dated June 14, 2018 No. 23-P “With regard to the case on verification of the constitutional nature of part 1 of Article 1.7 and part 4 of Article 4.5 of the RF Administrative Offence Code, clause 4 of Article 1 of the Federal Law “On amendments to the Russian Federation Criminal Code and the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure on revising the grounds and the procedure for exemption from criminal liability” and clause 4 of Article 1 of the Federal Law “On amendments to a number of legislative acts of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption of the Federal Law “On amendments to the Russian Federation Criminal Code and the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure on revising the grounds and the procedure for exemption from criminal liability” in connection with the complaints of A.I. Zalyautdinov, N.Ya. Ismagilov and O.V. Cherednyak”] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://legalacts.ru/sud/postanovlenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-14062018-n-23-p/ [Google Scholar]
  12. A.I. Chuchaev (ed.), Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (nauchno-prakticheskii) [Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (scientific and practical)] (Prospect, Moscow, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. K.V. Obrazhiev, Crim. Law 2, 59-66 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda Possiiskoi Federatsii po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chasti pervoi stati 10 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chasti vtoroi stati 24, chasti vtoroi stati 27, chasti chetvertoi stati 133 i stati 212 Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan S.A. Borovkova i N.I. Morozova [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with regard to the case on verification of the constitutional nature of provisions of part one of Article 10 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, part two of Article 24, part two of Article 27, part four of Article 133 and Article 212 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with the complaints of S.A. Borovkov and N.I. Morozov] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102169126 [Google Scholar]
  15. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 15.10.2018 № 36-P “Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti pervoi stati 10 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chasti vtoroi stati 24, chasti vtoroi stati 27, chasti pervoi stati 239 i punkta 1 stati 254 Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanki A.I. Tikhomolovoi” [Resolution of the RF Constitutional Court of 15.10.2018 No. 36-P “With regard to the case on verification of the constitutional nature of part one of Article 10 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, part two of Article 24, part two of Article 27, part one of Article 239 and clause 1 of Article 254 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with the complaint of A.I. Tikhomolova”] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_309039/ [Google Scholar]
  16. A.V. Ivanchin, Bul. Yaroslavl Demidov State Univ. Ser.: Humanit. 2(40), 65-71 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. A.D. Nechaev, Compar. Constit. Rev. 3(118), 134-147 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 10 fevralya 2017 g. № 2-P “Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii stati 212.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina I.I. Dadina” [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 2-P of February 10, 2017 “In the case of checking the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen I. I. Dadin”] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71509066/#ixzz6yhjrac8s [Google Scholar]
  19. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie № 22-3271/2019 ot 29 noyabrya 2019 g. po delu № 1-292/2019 [Appellate resolution No. 22-3271/2019 dated November 29, 2019 with regard to case No. 1-292/2019] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/cj47V72ocwQ9/ [Google Scholar]
  20. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie № 22-2119/2019 ot 17 dekabrya 2019 g. po delu № 1-76/2019 [Appellate resolution No. 22-2119/2019 of December 17, 2019 with regard to case No. 1-76/2019] Accessed on: June 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/lNFt0Xg2li54/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.