EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 7
Section 21st Century Learning Approaches & Sustainable innovations in Language and Communications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112401001
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Chen, C.H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 301–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cho, K. & Schunn, C.D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(30), 409–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler, D.L., & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Falchikov, N., & Blythman, M. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Freeman, M., & McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 551–569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2009). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kwok, R.C.W., & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers & Education, 32(2), 109–125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin, S., Liu, E., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C.H., & Yuan, S.M. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. McGourty, J. (2000). ‘Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach’, IEEE Transactions on Education 43, 120–124 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nelson, M.M., & Schunn, C.D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberts, T.S. (2006) Self, peer, and group assessment in e-learning. Hershey, PA, Information Science Pub. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Topping, K.J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55–87). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Internet-based peer assessment in high school settings. In L.T.W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 743–754). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tseng, S.C., & Tsai, C.C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161–1174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang, Y.-F. (2010). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students’ writing. British Journal of Educational Technology. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.