EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Part 1 - Business and Economy for Sustainable Future
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112403002
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Ali, S.E.A., & Khurram, S. (2017). Impact of demographic and health factors on GDP growth of South Asian Countries. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 166–179. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali, S.E.A., Lai, F.-W., Dominic, P.D.D., Brown, N.J., Lowry, P.B.B., & Ali, R.F. (2021). Stock market reactions to favorable and unfavorable information security events: A systematic literature review. Computers & Security, 110(November), 102451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali, S.E.A., Lai, F.-W., Hassan, R., & Shad, M.K. (2021). The Long-Run Impact of Information Security Breach Announcements on Investors’ Confidence: The Context of Efficient Market Hypothesis. Sustainability, 13(3): 1066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, S.E.A.L. F.W. and H.R. (2020). Socio-Economic Factors On Sector-Wide Systematic Risk Of Information Security Breaches: Conceptual Framework. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 502–512. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.05.54 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Rodriguez, E., & Espinosa-Paredes, G. (2012). Is the US stock market becoming weakly efficient over time? Evidence from 80-year-long data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391(22), 5643–5647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ang, J.S., & Pohlman, R.A. (1978). A note on the price behavior of Far Eastern stocks. Journal of International Business Studies, 103–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bogle, J.C. (1999). Common sense on mutual funds: New imperatives for the intelligent investor. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cochrane, J.H. (2011). Presidential address: Discount rates. The Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1047–1108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Bondt, W.F.M., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Staunton, M. (2003). Global evidence on the equity risk premium. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15(4), 27–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fama, E.F. (1991). Efficient Capital Markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5): 1575. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328565 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fama, E.F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M.C., & Roll, R. (1969). The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information. International Economic Review, 10(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525569 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1988). Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), 246–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Friend, I., Blume, M., & Crockett, J. (1970). Mutual funds and other institutional investors: a new perspective. McGraw-Hill Companies. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gagliardini, P., Ossola, E., & Scaillet, O. (2016). Time-varying risk premium in large cross-sectional equity data sets. Econometrica, 84(3), 985–1046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Granger, C.W.J. (1975). A survey of empirical studies on capital markets. International Capital Markets, 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guidi, F., & Gupta, R. (2012). Forecasting volatility of the ASEAN-5 stock markets: a nonlinear approach with non-normal errors. Discussion Papers Finance (14). [Google Scholar]
  18. Hawawini, G. (1984). European equity markets: Price behavior and efficiency, monograph series in Finance and Economics. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ito, M., & Sugiyama, S. (2009). Measuring the degree of time varying market inefficiency. Economics Letters, 103(1), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.01.028 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jensen, M.C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica, vol. 47, pp 263–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, J.H., Shamsuddin, A., & Lim, K.P. (2011). Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(5), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjempfin.2011.08.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kiwiriyakun, M. (2013). The Risk-Return Relationship in Asean-5 Stock Markets: An Empirical Study Using Capital Asset Pricing Model. Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lim, K.-P. (2007). Ranking market efficiency for stock markets: A nonlinear perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 376, 445–454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lim, K.-P., & Brooks, R.D. (2006). The evolving and relative efficiencies of stock markets: Empirical evidence from rolling bicorrelation test statistics. Available at SSRN 931071. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ljung, G.M., & Box, G.E.P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297–303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lo, A. (2004). The adaptive market hypothesis: market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(5), 15–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lo, A.W. (1997). Market Efficiency. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lo, A.W. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(5), 15–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lo, A.W. (2005). Reconciling Efficient Market with Behavioral Finance: The ADAPTIVE MARKETS HYPOTHESIS. The Journal of Investment Consulting, 7(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.728864 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lo, A.W., & MacKinlay, A.C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1): 4166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Malkiel, B.G. (2007). A Random Walk Down Wall Street:: the Time-tested Strategy for Successful Investing. 2003. WW Norton & Company. [Google Scholar]
  34. Malkiel, B.G., & Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reilly, F.K., & Brown, K.C. (2011). Investment analysis and portfolio management. Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar]
  36. Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests Part I: On past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ross, S.A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing, 'Journal of Economic Theory’. Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sharpe, W.F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (2000). Behavioral Portfolio Theory. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2): 127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676187 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Solnik, B.H. (1973). Note on the validity of the random walk for European stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 28(5), 1151–1159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Y., & Liu, L. (2016). Spillover effect in Asian financial markets: A VAR-structural GARCH analysis. China Finance Review International. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.