EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 05002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 20
Section Part 3 - Business and Economy for Sustainable Future
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112405002
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Abdul Hamid, N., & Abd Rahman, A. (2014). A systematic literature review on the success factor of innovation commercialization performance. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdul Razak, A., & Murray, P.A. (2017). Innovation strategies for successful commercialisation in public universities. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(3), 296–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajagbe, M.A., Ismail, K., Isiavwe, D.T., & Ogbari, M.I. (2015). Barriers to Technological and non-Technological Innovation Activities in Malaysia. European Journal of Business and Management, 13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, R., Leman, A.M., Sunar, N.M., & Ahmad, A.N. (2017). Issues Related to Low Commercialisation Rates of the University’s Research and Development (R&D) Products: Industrial Perspective. Advanced Science Letters, 23(11), 10616–10620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arenas, J.J., & González, D. (2018). Technology transfer models and elements in the University-Industry collaboration. Administrative sciences, 8(2), 19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Azman, N., Sirat, M., Pang, V., Lai, Y.M., Govindasamy, A.R., & Din, W.A. (2019). Promoting university-industry collaboration in Malaysia: Stakeholders’ perspectives on expectations and impediments. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(1), 86–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C.L. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76, 51–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Banal-Estañol, A., & Seldeslachts, J. (2011). Merger failures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(2), 589–624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boal, K.B. and Hooijberg, R. (2000), “Strategic leadership research: Moving on”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 515–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Charles, D. (2003), ‘Universities and Territorial Development: Reshaping the Regional Role of UK Universities,' Local Economy, 18: 1, pp. 7–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Christensen, C. (1997) Innovators Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Collier, A., Gray, B.J. and Ahn, M.J. (2011), “Enablers and barriers to university and high technology SME partnerships”, Small Enterprise Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 2–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dai, Y. (2007). Patent or publish? -University researcher’s choice between traditional and commercial research outcomes. Syracuse University. [Google Scholar]
  14. Datta, A., Jessup, L., & Reed, R. (2011). Corporate Reputation and the Commercialization of Innovation: Does Reputation Match Reality, and Does Innovation Matter? Technology and Investment, 02(04), 256–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dasgupta, M., Gupta, R.K., & Sahay, A. (2011). Linking Technological Innovation, Technology Strategy and Organizational Factors: A Review. Global Business Review, 12(2), 257–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Determinant Factors for Commercialising Research Products in Malaysian Public Universities. (2011). International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(6S4), 780–787. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ee Shiang, L., & Nagaraj, S. (2011). Impediments to innovation: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing firms. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(2), 209–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Farley, A. & Abd Rahman Ahmad. (2013). Federal government funding reforms: issues and challenges facing Malaysian public universities. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(1); 282–298. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fletcher, A.C., & Bourne, P.E. (2012). Ten simple rules to commercialize scientific research. PLoS computational biology, 8(9). [Google Scholar]
  20. Gunasekara, C. (2004), ‘The Third Role of Australian Universities in Human Capital Formation,’ Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26: 3, pp. 329–343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hartono, A., & Kusumawardhani, R. (2019). Innovation Barriers and Their Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms. Global Business Review, 20(5), 1196–1213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamid, N.A., & Rahman, A.A. (2014, May). A systematic literature review on the success factor of innovation commercialization performance. In 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (pp. 199–204). IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harmancioglu, N., Grinstein, A., & Goldman, A. (2010). Innovation and performance outcomes of market information collection efforts: The role of top management team involvement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(1), 33–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Heng, L.H., Rasli, A.M., & Senin, A.A. (2012). Knowledge Determinant in University Commercialization: A Case Study of Malaysia Public University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 251–257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hertzfeld, H.R., Link, A.N., & Vonortas, N.S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825–838. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ibata-Arens, K. (2008). Comparing National Innovation Systems in Japan and the United States: Push, Pull, Drag and Jump Factors in the Development of New Technology. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(3), 315–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lammarino, S., Sanna-Randaccio, F., & Savona, M. (2007). The perception of obstacles to innovation. Multinational and domestic firms in Italy. Office of Economic Theory and Application. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ismail, K., & Ajagbe, M.A. (2013). The Roles of Government in the Commercialization of Technology Based Firms. 8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ismail, N., Nor M.J.M., & Sidek, S. (2017). Challenges for Research Product Commercialisation: A Case of Malaysian Academic Researchers. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(6), 1543–1550. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ismail, N., Sidek, S., & Nor, M.J.M. (2015). Collaboration Between Academic and Industry Partner for a Successful Research Products Commercialisation in Malaysia. 4. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ismail, N., Sidek, S., & Nor, M.J.M. (2018). Determinant factors for effective collaboration between university and industry in commercialising research products in Malaysia. In 27th International Business Information Management Association Conference-Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, IBIMA 2016 (pp. 2384–2394). International Business Information Management Association, IBIMA. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jewels, T., Al-Rawshdi, A., Abusharekh, R.N. and Shamisi, A.S. (2011), Organisational Culture and Its Effects on Innovation within ERP Systems in Open Innovation in Firms and Public Administrations: Technologies for Value Creation, IGI Global, Pennsylvania, United States. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kamaruddin, N.K., & Samsuddin, A. (2013). A case study of R&D technology commercialisation: challenges, issues, and the way forward. [Google Scholar]
  34. Khademi, T., & Ismail, K. (2013). Commercialization Success Factors of University Research Output. Jurnal Teknologi, 64(3). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, K.-J., Ohta, T., & Kakehi, K. (2010). Formal boundary spanning by industry liaison offices and the changing pattern of university-industry cooperative research: The case of the University of Tokyo. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 189–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P.H. and Balkin, D.B. (2005). Innovation Speed: Transfering University Technology to Market. Res. Policy, (34):1058–1075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Markman, G.D., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and Technology Commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401–1423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. MASTIC. 2008. National Survey for research and Development, Putrajaya, Malaysia. Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre. [Google Scholar]
  39. Markman, G.D., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401–1423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Manap, A., Ismail, N., & Sidek, S. (2017). The roles of technology transfer offices to facilitate intellectual property commercialization in the university: Issues and challenges. The Social Sciences, 12(6), 919–924. [Google Scholar]
  41. Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D Management, 48(1), 7–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mohd-Azmi, M.L., Jesse, F.F.A., Sarah, S.A., Roslan, S., Zuraidah, A., & Hambali, I.U. (2016). Transforming Agriculture Research into Commercialisation: Experience of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(3). [Google Scholar]
  43. Mora-Valentin, E.M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., & Guerras-Martin, L.A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nor, M., & Jailani, M. (2014). Determinants for a Successful Commercialisation of Technology Innovation from Malaysian Universities. 1, 10. [Google Scholar]
  45. Norain, I. & Safiah, S. (2019). Determinant Factors for Commercialising Research Products in Malaysian Public Universities 2278-3075. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rahim, N.A., Mohamed, Z.B., Amrin, A., Masrom, M., & Azmeela, S. Conceptualization And Measurement Of University Technology Transfer Office Efficiency As A Formative Construct [Google Scholar]
  47. Sanberg, P.R., Gharib, M., Harker, P.T., Kaler, E.W., Marchase, R.B., Sands, T.D., Arshadi, N., & Sarkar, S. (2014). Changing the academic culture: Valuing patents and commercialization toward tenure and career advancement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(18), 6542–6547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Siegel, D.S., & Wright, M. (2007). Intellectual property: the assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 529–540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sohail A.S. (1997). A longitudinal study ofplanning and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies. [Google Scholar]
  50. Stumpf, S.A., & Mullen, T.P. (1991). Strategic leadership: concepts, skills, style and process. Development, 10(1), 1–991. [Google Scholar]
  51. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 10(1-4), 281–295. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sutopo, W., & Astuti, R.W. (2017). The Schemes Funding Analysis for Technology Commercialization: A Case Study. 10 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sharif, S.M., Ahamat, A., Abdullah, M.M., Jabar, J., & Bakri, M.H. (2018). University Intellectual Property Commercialization: A Critical Review of Literature. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 8(SEPT), 874–886. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Arshadi, N., & Sarkar, S. (2014). Changing the academic culture: Valuing patents and commercialization toward tenure and career advancement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(18), 6542–6547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Thursby, J.G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M.C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics, and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. The journal of Technology transfer, 26(1-2), 59–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wood, M.S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54(2), 153–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.